1. Home
  2. New York State

New York State

Law Decoded, May 30–June 6: Terra’s aftermath in China, Japan and South Korea

Last week brought some notable reactions to the stablecoin’s depegging in the East Asia region.

The “long waves” of TerraUSD’s May 7 collapse, which we noted two newsletters ago, are extending even further. Last week brought some notable reactions to the stablecoin’s depegging in the East Asia region. 

A Chinese state-owned media outlet, the Economic Daily has signaled that the Chinese government may introduce even tighter regulations on cryptocurrencies and stablecoins due to the collapse of the Terra ecosystem. It might even mean a complete ban on stablecoins to prohibit ownership, transfer, purchase and sale of the assets, some experts believe. What China plans, Japan does — as a new law will limit the issuance of stablecoins to licensed banks, registered money transfer agents and trust companies.

It comes as no surprise that South Korea, the birthplace of Terra’s creator, is also among the first nations to react. Amid signs that Terraform Labs co-founder Do Kwon was facing legal trouble in South Korea, the country’s ruling party announced the launch of the Digital Asset Committee, whose task would be to oversee crypto until a permanent government entity is established. This is at the same time when the nation’s Financial Supervisory Service is demanding reports from 157 payment gateways about any service related to crypto, its plans for the future and disclosure of digital assets.

An open letter from crypto critics

From 2018 to 2021, the budget spent on crypto lobbying grew from $2.2 million to at least $9 million, and that didn’t go unnoticed. A group of academics, software developers and technology experts decided to pen an open letter to lawmakers in Washington, urging them to resist the lobbyist pressure and attempts to create a “regulatory safe haven” for crypto. The crypto community did not stay silent and expressed its disagreements with the letter and its contents — sadly, in some cases recursing to calling the co-signers “trolls” and “attention seekers.” 

Continue reading

401(k) will fight for crypto in court

The United States Department of Labor’s March warning to 401(k) providers to stay away from crypto in their portfolios provoked some serious pushback across the spectrum of industry supporters, from congresspeople to trade associations. But ForUsAll, a 401(k) retirement provider with crypto already accessible to its clients, went even further and sued the Department. The company is seeking the withdrawal of a DOL compliance assistance release, which explained that the Department’s Employee Benefits Security Administration may “conduct an investigative program” to target 401(k) plans that contain cryptocurrency.

Continue reading

One step closer to mining moratorium in New York

Two months after it passed the lower chamber, the proof-of-work mining ban bill was approved by the New York State Senate. It means “no” to any new mining operations in the state for the next two years, but anyone using 100% of renewable energy is spared from the prohibition. Will other states follow New York and outlaw PoW mining to save the environment? That is surely not impossible. Though the European Parliament had to remove a similar plan after facing pushback. 

Continue reading

There's even more in the full version of Cointelegraph's Law Decoded newsletter. To receive Cointelegraph's newsletter of blockchain and crypto policy developments straight to your inbox, subscribe below!

SEC Unveils Plan to Compensate Investors in Mila Kunis’ Stoner Cats

Law Decoded: The difference between New York City and New York State, April 25-May 2

New York State moratorium on PoW mining reinvigorates the conversation around crypto industry's sustainability.

Last week, New York dominated crypto media headlines in very different ways. In New York State, the local Assembly voted in favor of the bill that would ban for two years any new mining operations that rely on proof-of-work (PoW) consensus mechanisms and use fossil fuel-generated energy. 

A temporary moratorium, which could be extended after the state’s Department of Environmental Conservation provides its assessments of the industry’s carbon footprint, marks the first major legislative attack on PoW mining on environmental grounds in the United States. The push mobilized the community — after digital asset advocacy groups rang the alarm on Twitter. Then, proponents of the ban had to endure three hours of a heated debate to narrowly pass the draft. There’s hope for an even tighter fight in the NY State Senate.

Meanwhile, New York City Mayor Eric Adams set an example of supporting innovation as he hit out at his state’s BitLicense regime during an interview at the Crypto and Digital Assets Summit in London. As a recently elected politician who's claimed to take his three paychecks in Bitcoin (BTC), Adams called the license — the only one at the state level — a “high barrier” and urged legislators if not to think outside the box, then to at least not destroy the box itself.

Another instance of a reasonable approach to regulation was exemplified by New York State Senator Kevin Thomas, who has introduced a bill to define, penalize and criminalize fraud specifically targeting developers and projects that intend to dupe crypto investors. The amendment would impose rug pull charges on developers that sell “more than 10% of such tokens within five years from the date of last sale of such tokens.”

A discussion that is here to stay

While some consider New York State’s legislature to be “dominated by radical and fringe elements” who are “ignorant to a new and innovative sector of finance and technology,” the proposed PoW moratorium bill might in fact represent a first notable instance of legislative action with regard to crypto mining’s sustainability. The clash over how power-hungry various consensus mechanisms are and whether it is renewable or fossil fuel-generated energy that powers mining operations has been building up for some time on federal and international levels. These battles will definitely intensify in the months and years to come. At the end of the day, it’s not all bad. Some experts consider Albany legislators' efforts to be a “prudent action” in terms of pushing the miners toward the green shift, even if it could have a cooling effect on their operations at first.

Regulation fest in Latin America

As a major South American jurisdiction, Brazil passed its first bill governing cryptocurrencies in a Senate plenary session. According to the draft, which is still yet to gain approval from the Chamber of Deputies, the executive branch will draft rules for crypto assets and either create a new regulator or crown the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Central Bank of Brazil as a principal regulator for the industry. Panama is already a step ahead, with its own crypto law passing the third and final round of consideration. Now, it is the president’s turn to greenlight the bill. The initiative’s main advocate, congressman Gabriel Silva, believes that the law will “help Panama become a hub of innovation and technology in Latin America.” Meanwhile, Cuba is expected to begin to issue virtual asset service provider licenses starting May 16.

CFTC gains momentum

The United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission, one of the main power centers in the crowded U.S. crypto regulation scheme, seems to have gotten some extra points in the race. A bipartisan group of lawmakers re-introduced the Digital Commodity Exchange Act, which would bring cryptocurrency developers, dealers, exchanges and stablecoin providers under the purview of the CFTC. Granted, the mandate would extend only to cryptocurrencies deemed to be commodities, while the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission would still hold power over the digital asset securities offerings. Well-received by the crypto community, the bill should make it through the first hearing by the U.S. House Agriculture Committee first.

SEC Unveils Plan to Compensate Investors in Mila Kunis’ Stoner Cats

Go green or go home? What the NY State mining moratorium could mean for crypto industry

The “anti-technology” bill could accelerate mining operators' switch to renewable energy, experts say.

On April 26, the State of New York put itself at the forefront of the regulatory struggle with crypto, as its Assembly voted for a two-year moratorium on crypto mining operations that use energy generated by fossil-fuel power plants. Depending on how one looks at it, this development could either signal a new alarming legislative trend or a trigger that would accelerate the digital asset industry’s movement toward a more sustainable path. 

Moratorium with further evaluation

The lower chamber of the NY state legislature, the Assembly, passed a bill that would put a two-year hold on any new mining operations using the proof-of-work (PoW) consensus mechanism, as well as on the renewal of existing permits.

The bill, S6486D/A7389C, is marketed by its sponsors as a necessary act of compliance with the 2019 Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act and its goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40% by 2030. The bill also mandates a “generic environmental impact statement” to be made by the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), which should evaluate the energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of PoW miners and their impact on public health.

Next up for the bill is a vote in the upper chamber, the State Senate, after which, if approved, it would go to Governor Kathy Hochul, who can either veto it or sign it into law.

The advocacy group Blockchain Association believes that the “anti-technology” bill can still be sunk in the Senate. The heated debate in the Assembly lasted for three hours, and the vote ended up far from unanimous: 95 in favor, 52 against.

A state affair

The passage of the bill triggered an alarm from the crypto community. The Crypto Council for Innovation shared a concern that the initiative could put innovation on the back burner. Kyle, Schneps, director of public policy of Foundry, underlined that the initiative is singling out only one industry out of many operating on fossil fuels in the state, and the decentralized finance (DeFi) Education Fund emphasized legislators’ refusal to acknowledge the benefits of the industry.

The sponsor of the bill, environmental and housing rights activist Anna Kelles dismissed these arguments in a Twitter discussion with the head of policy of Blockchain Association Jake Chervinsky. She pointed out that the bill is “extremely narrow in scope” and will only pertain to “large-scale crypto mining” in power plants that use fossil-based energy sources. Moreover, the moratorium will apply only to mining operations at decommissioned power plants with the single aim of preventing the large-scale relaunch of such plants that could be incentivized by crypto mining profitability. By her estimate, there are 49 such facilities in the State of New York.

As John Belizaire, CEO of green data center developer Soluna Computing, noted to Cointelegraph that the moratorium will certainly “have a cooling effect” on crypto mining in the state. He believes the state is taking a “prudent action” to study the issue of environmental effects as the growth of the industry has raised concerns about whether it is prolonging the life of legacy fuels rich with carbon:

“We’d encourage the state to participate in open dialogue with forward-looking companies to learn how the crypto mining industry could accelerate New York’s renewable energy development.”

John Warren, CEO of GEM Mining — which claims its 32,000 miners to be 97% carbon neutral — commented to Cointelegraph that the passage of this bill reveals that the New York legislature is “dominated by radical and fringe elements” who are “ignorant to a new and innovative sector of finance and technology.” Warren said:

“It is no wonder why so many citizens and businesses are fleeing New York in order to pursue great opportunities in common sense business-friendly states. As a graduate of New York University and someone who loves New York, it is painful to see the state implement policies that mirror China and Russia.”

The future is green

The experts tend to agree on the possible effects of the bill beyond the boundaries of New York State. Warren is convinced that the issue represents a unique case of “a radical outlier” and hence will have little effect on the United States’ role as the global leader in cryptocurrency mining:

“We’ve recently seen the opposite as many legislators have openly encouraged crypto operations in their states and even gone so far as to enact legislation in favor of crypto. Take Georgia, for example.”

Belizaire also found it hard to name other states with similarly hostile policies toward miners. He brought up the example of North Dakota as a state that saw the job creation potential of crypto mining and chose to partner with the industry:

“The NY ban seems to send a unilaterally negative message even before a conversation takes place. Unfortunately, this emboldens the narrative that the PoW protocol is bad for the planet.”

Regardless of the vote’s outcome, the New York moratorium is unlikely a case of a single state’s allergy to crypto mining. Coming from an environmental activism background, Kelles repeatedly highlighted that her concern is for the possible influence on New York State’s environment, not the crypto industry at large. It resembles a larger discussion about PoW mining that is happening on both national and international levels.

In October 2021, more than 70 NGOs have co-signed a letter to the U.S. Congress where they called legislators’ attention to the numerous instances of fossil-fuel plants’ relaunch across the country.

As Steve Wright, former general manager of Chelan County — Washington’s public utility district — explained at the congressional hearing in January 2022, miners’ interest in dormant fossil fuel facilities is driven by a simple market mechanism, which means there’s no rational reason for them to stop exploring such possibilities.

In that sense, the environmental push from the New York State legislators is an instance of a larger discussion that will inevitably persist around crypto mining and fossil fuels. While the New York bill doesn’t contain a single word about using renewable energy in mining, it could, in fact, incentivize the usage of green energy — Warren, who doesn’t perceive this measure as proper, still admitted that such a possibility exists.

Belizaire commented:

“I think the moratorium will have mining companies give a second thought to using fossil fuels to power their operations. New York’s mission is clear: It’s all in on renewables. PoW crypto mining needs to get on the bus.”

Crypto mining, he believes, could even become a “special ingredient” of the larger green energy shift.

SEC Unveils Plan to Compensate Investors in Mila Kunis’ Stoner Cats

New York Mayor urges state to abandon ‘stifling’ BitLicense scheme

“We have to continue to be competitive” the mayor said in a keynote interview at a London crypto conference where he suggested scrapping the states’ BitLicensing requirement.

New York City Mayor Eric Adams has hit out at his states’ BitLicensing regime, claiming that it stifles innovation and economic growth.

In a closing keynote interview at the Crypto and Digital Assets Summit in London on April 27, Adams suggested his state legislature counterparts in Albany “listen to those who are in the industry” adding:

“It’s about thinking not only outside the box, but on this one, we may have to destroy the box.”

Adams is a crypto advocate who ran for mayor planning to turn New York City into the “center of the cryptocurrency industry” and took his first three paychecks in Bitcoin (BTC). In the interview he said cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology are the “next chapters in the future” and the opportunity shouldn't be squandered.

“New York State is the only state to require a license for crypto companies. That’s a high barrier, and it just makes us less competitive. We have to continue to be competitive.”

Since 2015, any “virtual currency business” wishing to offer services within New York requires a BitLicense to do so. According to the states’ Department of Financial Services (DFS) the license ensures that its residents have a “well-regulated way to access the virtual currency marketplace” and that the state remains at the “center of technological innovation and forward-looking regulation”.

Many crypto firms moved from New York when the license was introduced and recent calls to remove regulatory barriers and ease restrictions often focus on the license, which costs $5,000 in application fees along with unclear capital requirements set by the DFS.

Related: What can Eric Adams do? The limits of turning New York City into a crypto hub

In the state capital, lawmakers take an altogether stricter regulatory approach to the cryptocurrency industry than Adams would. On Tuesday the New York State Assembly passed a bill to the Senate which would place a two-year ban all on all new proof-of-work (PoW) cryptocurrency mining facilities using carbon energy.

On April 9 Governor Kathy Hochul signed into law a requirement that BitLicensed firms must pay assessment fees to cover the cost of regulatory operating expenses incurred by the DFS, placing possibly tens of thousands of dollars a year extra in fees on firms.

“It is imperative that we work with the state lawmakers and regulators,” Adams said “I’m really happy to see Governor Hochul is leaning into this industry as we examine what are the bureaucratic issues that we need to look at.”

SEC Unveils Plan to Compensate Investors in Mila Kunis’ Stoner Cats

New York legislators to vote on PoW mining moratorium this week

If passed, the suspension of both new licenses and renewal applications will last for two years.

The New York state legislature might ban Proof-of-Work (PoW) crypto mining in the state for at least two years, citing environmental concerns. 

Over the past weekend, on April 23 and 24, several crypto advocacy groups — including the Blockchain Association and Crypto Council for Innovation — rang the alarm over the upcoming vote in the New York Assembly. The state legislature's official webpage did not indicate a specific date for the vote.

The bill,  S6486D/A7389C, seeks to establish a two-year moratorium on cryptocurrency mining that utilizes Proof-of-Work (PoW) consensus mechanism. It would amend the existing environmental conservation law to comply with the 2019 Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act, which implies a 40% greenhouse gas emission reduction by 2030. As the co-sponsors of the bill believe, the PoW mining stands in the way of reaching this goal. Hence, they propose a moratorium on mining permits issuance and renewal.

The bill offers some important reservations, though. As one clause goes, “the department shall not approve an application to renew an existing permit [...] if the renewal application seeks to increase or will allow or result in an increase in the amount of electric energy consumed or utilized by a cryptocurrency mining operation.” This could mean that mining businesses' applications seeking to preserve the existing capacities already licensed by the state would not be subject to new restrictions.

Another important caveat is that both moratorium paragraphs are aimed at the “electric generating facilities” that “utilize a carbon-based fuel,” meaning that the proposed legislation would not extend to the operations that use renewable energy in mining. It would, however, cover facilities like Greenidge Generation's converted natural gas power plant near Seneca Lake, which has been at the center of court battles in the recent years.

Crypto industry's advocacy groups have called on the “pro-tech, pro-innovation, pro-crypto” residents of the New York State to get active and encourage their assembly members to vote against the moratorium. After the Assembly vote, the bill must pass the State Senate before it gets to the desk of the governor who has the power to veto it.

SEC Unveils Plan to Compensate Investors in Mila Kunis’ Stoner Cats

NY Sen. Thomas proposes to criminalize rug pulls and other crypto frauds

Senator Kevin Thomas seeks to provide prosecutors with a clear legal framework against crypto crimes that align with the spirit of the blockchain while combatting fraud.

New York State Senator Kevin Thomas introduced a new bill amendment request to establish certain offenses related to rug pulls and other frauds related to virtual token distribution, misuse of private keys and hidden interests in crypto projects.

The bill drafted by Sen. Thomas, Senate Bill S8839, calls for defining, penalizing and criminalizing frauds specifically targeted at developers and projects that intend to dupe crypto investors.

A snippet of Senate Bill S8839. Source: nysenate.gov

Through the bill, Thomas seeks to provide prosecutors with a clear legal framework against crypto crimes that align with the spirit of the blockchain while combatting fraud. It calls for a law amendment that will imply rug pull charges on developers that sell “more than 10% of such tokens within five years from the date of last sale of such tokens.”

Private key fraud involves disclosing or misusing another person’s private keys without prior affirmative consent. The bill also seeks to charge developers with fraudulent failure to disclose interest in virtual tokens that don’t publicly disclose personal crypto holdings on the landing page of the primary website.

The bill wa under committee review to determine its eligibility for floor consideration at the time of writing.

Related: US lawmakers introduce companion bill to 'mitigate risks' from El Salvador’s Bitcoin Law

Two members of the House of Representatives — California Representative Norma Torres and Arkansas Representative Rick Crawford — recently introduced legislation to mitigate financial risks tied to El Salvador adopting Bitcoin (BTC) as legal tender.

As Cointelegraph reported, the proposed legislation seeks to analyze the risks to El Salvador’s “cybersecurity, economic stability and democratic governance.” According to Torres:

“El Salvador is an independent democracy and we respect its right to self-govern, but the United States must have a plan in place to protect our financial systems from the risks of this decision.”

SEC Unveils Plan to Compensate Investors in Mila Kunis’ Stoner Cats

NY State Supreme Court dismisses petition against crypto mining company

The judge ruled that the petition lacked merit as he didn’t find proof of the environmental harm.

In an important precedent, a New York State Supreme Court judge in Yates County ruled in favor of cryptocurrency mining firm Greenidge Generation, dismissing a petition filed by a coalition of environmental activists. 

According to an April 7 press release by Greenidge, Judge Daniel Doyle dismissed a petition against the Greenidge Generation Holdings brought by a group of environmental organizations — Sierra Club, Seneca Lake Guardian and the Committee to Preserve the Finger Lakes as well as a number of individuals — in an attempt to stop the mining operation at Seneca Lake.

The petition also called for a halt to Greenidge’s plans to expand its Bitcoin mining operation at a facility in Dresden, a 300-people town in Yates County. The company is planning to increase its capacities at the gas-powered plant from 17,000 miners in service to 49,000 by the end of the year.

As the quote from the ruling goes:

“Petitioners have failed to establish that they would suffer an environmental injury different from that suffered by the general public.”

The judge specified that none of the petitioners live closer than 2,000 feet to the project site, while the local planning board took all the required steps to assess the project’s possible impacts on the environment.

According to the company release, the decision marks the fifth unsuccessful attempt of legal action against the project’s expansion by various entities. On Feb. 1, the cause against Greenidge was supported by the New York state gubernatorial candidate Jumaane Williams, who has called on current Governor Kathy Hochul to deny permits for proof-of-work crypto mining in the state.

SEC Unveils Plan to Compensate Investors in Mila Kunis’ Stoner Cats

Crypto lender Nexo confirms NYAG order, calls it a ‘mix up’

Nexo Financial confirms to be one of the two crypto lending firms to receive the cease and desist order from Attorney General James' office.

Cryptocurrency lending firm Nexo Financial denies the allegations of offering unregistered services to New Yorkers put forth by Attorney General Letitia James.

Attorney General James directed two unnamed crypto lending companies to cease operations On Oct. 18, citing failure to register the business in New York and performing unlawful activities.

Crypto lender Nexo is revealed to be one of the two companies to receive the cease and desist order from the Office of the Attorney General. Denying their involvement in unlawful operations, Nexo spokesperson said:

“Nexo is not offering its Earn Product and Exchange in New York, so it makes little sense to be receiving a cease and desist order for something we are not offering in New York anyway.”

According to Nexo, the allegations of operating an unregistered business in New York “appears to be a case of mixing up the recipients of the letter.” The company also confirmed the use of IP-based geoblocking on their platform that prevents New Yorkers from participating in locally unregistered services:

“Still, we will engage with the NY AG and seek clarity. Our company retains top-tier legal counsel both from US-based law firms and our in-house legal team.”

In addition, the company has also highlighted that Nexo Terms & Conditions explicitly state, “we do not offer our Earn product and Exchange in New York.”

To further protect New Yorkers from significant undisclosed risks, the New York State Office of the Attorney General has parallelly directed three more crypto platforms to provide information about their activities and products.

The order to shut down operations is backed by the Martin Act, which requires businesses to register before offering or selling securities or commodities in New York. “My office is responsible for ensuring industry players do not take advantage of unsuspecting investors,” said James.

Related: New York businesses ask governor to deny permits for crypto mining

A group of local New York businesses cosigned a letter asking the New York State Governor Kathy Hochul to deny permits for repurposing the city’s defunct fossil-fuel power plants for crypto mining.

The proposal demands an assessment of the environmental impact of restarting the Greenidge Generating Station and the Fortistar North Tonawanda plants, which were shut to control New York’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

SEC Unveils Plan to Compensate Investors in Mila Kunis’ Stoner Cats

New York businesses ask governor to deny permits for crypto mining

Crypto mining's environmental impact continues to raise concerns with regulators and businesses alike.

The New York State Governor Kathy Hochul has been asked by a group of local businesses to deny permits for converting the city’s old fossil-fuel power plants into crypto mining centers. The request comes in the form of a letter cosigned by a number of organizations, businesses and labor groups.

The letter calls for an environmental assessment for Proof-of-Work cryptocurrency mining in NYS while urging Governor Hochul to deny permits to convert the Greenidge Generating Station and the Fortistar North Tonawanda power plants into crypto mining facilities:

“Proof-of-Work cryptocurrency mining use enormous amounts of energy to power the computers needed to conduct business – should this activity expand in New York, it could drastically undermine New York’s climate goals established under the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act.”

The proposal highlighted the inefficiencies of PoW authentication and suggests that repowering defunct fossil-fueled power plants would be “seriously jeopardizing the state’s progress on and meeting mandates for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.”

The businesses also quoted NYS Commissioner Basil Seggos of the Department of Environmental Conservation saying that “Greenidge has not shown compliance with New York’s climate law.”

Citing the need for a full environmental assessment related to greenhouse gas emissions, the letter demands Hochul’s administration deny the Title V Air Permits for the two fossil-fuel facilities.

Related: Russia considers new energy tariffs as Chinese crypto miners relocate

On the other side of the world, Russian authorities are planning to introduce special electricity tariffs for recently-displaced Chinese cryptocurrency miners.

On Oct. 13, Russian Energy Minister Nikolai Shulginov suggested a new energy consumption framework to differentiate tariffs between general usage and cryptocurrency mining, stating:

“We can’t let miners capitalize on the situation at the expense of low residential electricity tariffs.”

According to research conducted by the New York Digital Investment Group (NYDIG), Bitcoin’s (BTC) energy consumption will remain below 0.5% of the global total over the next decade. The study also suggests that the carbon footprint of Bitcoin will be dependent on fluctuations in Bitcoin’s price, mining difficulty and energy consumption.

SEC Unveils Plan to Compensate Investors in Mila Kunis’ Stoner Cats