1. Home
  2. registration

registration

What are the Howey test and its implications for cryptocurrency?

The Howey test’s impact on cryptocurrency, explained — legal implications, compliance requirements and more.

What is the Howey test?

The Howey test is a legal test used in the United States to determine whether a transaction qualifies as an investment contract and, thus, is considered a security under federal law. The test was established by the U.S. Supreme Court in SEC v. W.J. Howey Co. (1946), and it has since been applied in numerous cases to determine whether various financial arrangements and offerings constitute securities. 

According to the Howey test, a transaction must contain an investment of funds in a group venture with the expectation that all gains will come from group efforts. A transaction is deemed a security if it satisfies these requirements, in which case it is subject to federal securities laws and regulations.

Understanding the criteria for a security

The test involves three key criteria that must be met in order for a transaction to qualify as a security, as discussed below:

The first criterion is a financial investment, which means that participants in the transaction must be risking their own money. This comprises both financial and in-kind investments.

The second requirement is a shared enterprise, which denotes that the financial success of the investors is somehow connected. This can be proven by providing evidence of the investors’ resource pooling or reliance on a third party to manage their investments.

The third criterion is an expectation of profits solely from the efforts of others, which means that the investors are relying on someone else to generate a return on their investment. This could include, for example, profits generated by a third-party manager or profits generated by the efforts of a particular group or organization.

The implications of the Howey test for cryptocurrency: Is it a security or not?

The implications of the Howey test for cryptocurrency are significant, as the test provides a framework for determining whether a particular cryptocurrency offering should be classified as a security under U.S. law. If a cryptocurrency offering meets the criteria outlined in the Howey test, it may be considered a security and subject to federal securities laws.

This has important ramifications for crypto businesses and investors since breaking federal securities laws can result in penalties, legal action and reputational harm to the business. To make sure they are in compliance with federal securities laws, cryptocurrency companies should carefully consider the Howey test before creating their offerings.

Related: Crypto and securities: New interpretation of US Howey test gaining ground

Tokens that do not pass the Howey test are considered utility tokens that provide investors with access to a future product or service or can be redeemed for discounted fees. While utility tokens are typically not considered securities, the SEC has suggested that the presence of a utility token framework does not necessarily mean that a project is exempt from being classified as a security.

Ultimately, the implications of the Howey test for cryptocurrency will depend on how regulators choose to apply the test in practice and how cryptocurrency companies choose to structure their offerings to comply with federal securities law.

Compliance with federal securities laws: What cryptocurrency companies need to know

Cryptocurrency companies need to be aware of the federal securities laws in the United States to ensure compliance with them. Here are some key things to keep in mind:

  • Securities laws apply to cryptocurrencies: Several cryptocurrencies are seen as securities by the Securities and Exchange Commission. This implies that cryptocurrency businesses must abide by federal securities laws, including the requirements for registration and disclosure.
  • Token offerings may be subject to securities laws: It can count as a securities offering if a cryptocurrency company sells tokens to the general public in return for cash or other assets. As a result, the business would have to adhere to securities rules, which would include registering the offering with the SEC.
  • The use of funds must be disclosed: A cryptocurrency company must state its financial goals when raising money through a securities offering. The business must also keep investors informed about how the money is being used.
  • Trading platforms may be subject to securities laws: Exchanges for securities may include cryptocurrency trading platforms that let users purchase and sell tokens. If so, the platform would have to file an SEC registration form and adhere to other securities regulations.
  • Penalties for non-compliance can be severe: Significant penalties may be imposed for non-compliance: A cryptocurrency corporation might incur severe consequences, such as fines and legal action if it violates federal securities regulations.

Therefore, cryptocurrency companies need to be aware of and comply with federal securities laws in the United States. This includes understanding whether their tokens are considered securities, disclosing the use of funds, and complying with registration and disclosure requirements.

Executives flood blockchain gaming firms ahead of 2025’s AAA launches

France on the verge of passing stringent crypto firm licensing laws

The bill was passed with a vote of 109 in favor and 71 against and will now rely on the approval of president Emmanuel Macron to be signed into law.

The French National Assembly has voted in favor of legislating stricter licensing rules for new cryptocurrency firms in order to harmonize local laws with proposed European Union (EU) standards.

The vote was passed with 109 votes (60.5%) in favor to 71 (39.5%) against. The French Senate has already passed the bill, which now goes to President Emmanuel Macron, who has 15 days to either approve it or send it back to the legislature.

If passed, the new law would oblige France-based cryptocurrency service providers to comply with stricter anti-money laundering rules, show that customer funds are segregated, adhere to new guidelines on reporting to regulators and provide more detailed risk and conflict of interest disclosures as a means to strengthen consumer protection.

The contents of the bill would not, however, apply to the 60 crypto firms registered with the Financial Markets Authority (AMF), the nation’s financial regulator. These firms will continue to comply with the AMF’s rules until the likely passing of the EU’s own crypto regulations with the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) bill.

The stricter rules would therefore only apply to crypto firms that register from July onwards.

Among the 60-AMF registered companies include Binance, which recently began piloting in-store payments in France with the cloud-based payment platform Ingenico via Binance Pay.

The legislative push for stricter licensing rules was initiated by Hervé Maurey, a member of the French Senate’s finance commission, who in Decemberproposed an amendment to eliminate a clause enabling crypto companies to operate without a full license until 2026.

Bank of France governor, Francois Villeroy de Galhau, also pushed the agenda in a Jan. 5 speech to members of the finance sector in Paris.

Related: Bitcoin business in France: Regulation, education and cash buy frustration

Like many regulators around the world, Villeroy de Galhau cited the need to respond to the recent turmoil in the cryptocurrency market as the motive behind the bill, which he wants to come into effect “as soon as possible.”

While MiCA will likely serve as the blueprint for cryptocurrency market regulation in the EU, he added that France simply couldn’t wait around for the more comprehensive laws enacting the licensing regime on digital asset service providers..

The EU is set to finally vote on MiCA regulation in April after two postponements. A successful outcome would likely see the highly anticipated crypto laws come into force sometime during 2024.

Executives flood blockchain gaming firms ahead of 2025’s AAA launches

Coinbase staking ‘fundamentally different’ to Kraken’s — chief lawyer

After the SEC’s crack-down on Kraken, Coinbase’s legal head outlined the differences between Kraken’s staking product and its own.

The staking services offered by cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase are “fundamentally different” to what was offered by its peer exchange Kraken — which recently came under fire from the United States securities regulator — according to Coinbase's head lawyer.

Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s chief legal officer, made the comments in his response to a shareholder question regarding its staking services during a Q&A session on the exchange’s fourth-quarter results, noting:

“The staking products that we offer on Coinbase are fundamentally different from the yield products that were described in the reinforcement action against Kraken. The differences matter.”

The first point of difference Grewal highlighted was that Coinbase users retain ownership of their cryptocurrencies at all times.

In its user agreement last updated Dec. 15, 2022, Coinbase states that it merely “facilitate[s] the staking of those assets on your behalf,” but may not replace any Ether (ETH) lost to slashing — which refers to the blockchain's mechanism for punishing bad behavior by reducing a validator’s tokens.

Grewal also suggested that another difference was its customers have a “right to the return,” with the firm unable to “simply just decide not to pay any returns at all.”

He pointed to the exchange's registration as a publicly-traded company as another critical point of difference, which enables customers to have “deep transparent insight into our financials.”

In comparison, the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC's) complaint against Kraken alleged its users lost control of their tokens by offering them to Kraken's staking program and investors were offered "outsized returns untethered to any economic realities" with Kraken also able to pay "no returns at all.”

Grewal however reiterated calls for regulatory clarity on staking services in the U.S. suggesting the SEC was outlining their expectations in court complaints rather than through clear regulations, noting:

“Rules making clear these distinctions would provide very real clarity and we think the public shouldn't have to parse complaints in federal court in order to understand what a regulator expects.”

Related: Coinbase beats Q4 earnings estimates amid falling transaction volume

In a Feb. 13 tweet, Grewal had opined that staking in itself was not a security transaction, using an analogy of harvesting oranges to elaborate on his position.

On the back of SEC Chair Gary Gensler calling on firms to register products with the regulator, Grewal indicated that Coinbase has no issues registering products with the SEC where “appropriate,” but added:

“I think it's fair to say that at this point in time, the path to registration for products and services that may qualify as securities has not been open, or at least readily or easily open.”

Coinbase is currently facing an SEC investigation into its products similar to the one that resulted in Kraken settling with the regulator for $30 million and being prohibited from offering staking services to its U.S. clients.

Coinbase intends to put up a fight, however, with CEO and co-founder, Brian Armstrong, suggesting the company would be willing to challenge the regulator and take the matter to court.

Executives flood blockchain gaming firms ahead of 2025’s AAA launches

Kazakhstan Law Limiting Crypto Miners’ Consumption of Electricity Enters Into Force

Kazakhstan Law Limiting Crypto Miners’ Consumption of Electricity Enters Into ForceA new law expanding the regulatory framework for cryptocurrency miners while restricting their access to low-cost electricity has entered into force in Kazakhstan. The legislation introduces a licensing regime for mining with two different categories of licenses that companies will have to renew periodically. President Tokayev Sings Law Regulating Crypto Assets Mining and Exchange in […]

Executives flood blockchain gaming firms ahead of 2025’s AAA launches

‘Kraken Down’ — SEC commissioner rebukes own agency over recent action

"Today, the SEC shut down Kraken’s staking program and counted it as a win for investors. I disagree and therefore dissent," said commissioner Hester Pierce.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) commissioner Hester Pierce has publicly rebuked her own agency over the shut down of Kraken's crypto staking program in the United States. 

The commissioner blasted her regulator in a Feb. 9 statement called "Kraken Down," noting that regulation by enforcement “is not an efficient or fair way of regulating” in an emerging industry, stating: 

Today, the SEC shut down Kraken’s staking program and counted it as a win for investors. I disagree and therefore dissent.

Peirce's statement also slammed the regulator for shutting down a “program that has served people well."

“Using enforcement actions to tell people what the law is in an emerging industry is not an efficient or fair way of regulating. Moreover, staking services are not uniform, so one-off enforcement actions and cookie-cutter analysis does not cut it," she said.

Peirce implied the regulator was “lazy and paternalistic” and suggested the SEC should have initiated a “public process to develop a workable registration process that provides valuable information to investors.”

Coinbase CEO and co-founder Brian Armstrong agreed with Peirce’s comments in a Feb. 9 tweet, suggesting that requiring businesses to register its staking services is a “disingenuous offer” as there is no clear path to registration.

Earlier this week, Armstrong said he had heard “rumors that the SEC would like to get rid of crypto staking in the U.S. for retail customers,” and said “it would be a terrible path for the U.S.” as it would further drive crypto businesses offshore.

Coinbase is currently the subject of a SEC probe similar to the one which resulted in the Kraken settlement, which it revealed in an Aug. 9 SEC filing was also related to its staking services.

On Feb. 9, the SEC announced that it had reached a $30 million settlement with crypto exchange Kraken, saying it failed “to register the offer and sale of their crypto asset staking-as-a-service program.”

Kraken said in a Feb. 9 blog post that it would still offer staking services to non-U.S. customers through a subsidiary, but according to the SEC announcement the firm is permanently banned from providing staking services to U.S. residents, even if they sought to register it with the regulator.

Related: Getting rid of crypto staking would be a ‘terrible path’ for the US — Coinbase CEO

Peirce, also known as the SEC’s “Crypto Mom,” has been a strong advocate for the crypto industry during her time at the regulator.

Peirce has previously proposed a “safe harbor” for token projects which are looking to build decentralized networks, in which the network developers would receive a three-year grace period where they were exempt from SEC legal action, with an updated version of the proposal released on Apr. 13, 2021.

Executives flood blockchain gaming firms ahead of 2025’s AAA launches

Russia’s Largest Private Bank Launches Digital Asset Platform

Russia’s Largest Private Bank Launches Digital Asset PlatformAlfa-Bank, one of the major Russian banking institutions, has established its own platform for digital financial assets. The launch became possible after Russia’s monetary authority added Alfa-Bank to its register of digital asset issuers this week. Privately-Owned Alfa-Bank Sets Up Digital Asset Platform With Central Bank’s Permission Russia’s Alfa-Bank has launched ‘A-Token,’ a platform allowing […]

Executives flood blockchain gaming firms ahead of 2025’s AAA launches

Kazakhstan Launches Consultation on Proposals to Improve Crypto Trading

Kazakhstan Launches Consultation on Proposals to Improve Crypto TradingFinancial authorities in Kazakhstan are starting a public consultation on draft changes to the country’s framework for digital-asset trading. The proposals include measures to reduce risks in the crypto market and improvements to the structure of exchange platforms. Kazakhstan’s Financial Hub Seeks to Amend Its Concept for Trading Digital Assets The Astana Financial Services Authority, […]

Executives flood blockchain gaming firms ahead of 2025’s AAA launches

Coinbase Fined €3.3 Million in Netherlands, Exchange Considers Appeal

Coinbase Fined €3.3 Million in Netherlands, Exchange Considers AppealThe Dutch central bank has imposed a fine on crypto exchange Coinbase for providing services in the past without the necessary registration. The trading platform, which has until March to object to the measure, is currently considering an appeal against the move. Dutch Monetary Authority Fines Coinbase for Operating Without Registration De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) […]

Executives flood blockchain gaming firms ahead of 2025’s AAA launches

UK’s FCA hints at why its given only 15% of crypto firms the regulatory nod

The UK financial watchdog has received 300 crypto firm registration applications but has approved only 41 applicants.

Despite the plans to turn the region into a bustling crypto hub, the United Kingdom’s financial watchdog says it has given the all-clear to only 41 out of 300 crypto firm applications seeking regulatory approval to date.

The U.K. Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) implemented the new cryptocurrency-focused regulations on Jan. 10, 2020, to supervise businesses operating in the sector and to ensure that they’re subject to the same anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) regulations as firms in traditional financial markets.

A statement from the FCA has revealed that of the 265 applications that were "determined" a mere 15% of these applications were approved and registered, 74% of firms either refused or withdrew their application, while 11% were rejected. Another 35 applications are yet to be determined.

While the FCA didn’t expressly state the cause of d the rejected or withdrawn applications, it did provide feedback on “good and poor quality” applications.

Among the more complete applications included a detailed description of the firm’s business model, the roles and responsibilities of business partners and service providers, sources of liquidity, flow-of-funds charts, and an outline of the policies and systems set in place to manage risk, the report stated.

A flowchart which helps firms understand whether they need to register with the FCA. Source: FCA

Incomplete applications were more apparent where companies used the application to promote their products and services, particularly in cases when the application process was still ongoing:

“Applicants’ websites and marketing material must not include language that gives the impression that making an application for registration is a form of endorsement or recommendation by the FCA.”

The report suggests that some companies may have had their applications scrapped if they couldn’t show that they have sufficient blockchain-compliance resources set in place to monitor on-chain transactions.

The FCA also doubled down on its anti-money laundering stance, demanding that all firms appoint a money laundering reporting officer who is “fully involved” in the application process.

The FCA also stressed that even for those firms that had their registrations approved, such approval doesn’t mean that they’re no longer free from obligations:

"Applicants must recognize that being registered is not a one-off formality or a tick-box exercise without any further obligations or interaction with the FCA.”

"This feedback should help applicants when they prepare their application for registration and help make the process as simple and efficient as possible," the note summarized.

Among the digital asset firms to have registered under the FCA thus far include Crypto.com, Revolut, CEX.IO, eToro, Wintermute Trading, DRW Global Markets, Copper, Globalblock, Moneybrain and Zodia Markets.

Related: British authorities split on banning sale of crypto investment products

Given that many companies provide international services, the U.K. FCA also confirmed that they’re now collaborating with other state agencies around the world — most notably the U.S. securities regulator and the U.S. commodities regulator — in order to strengthen regulation where necessary.

The FCA has stressed on several occasions that failure to register before conducting business may result in criminal charges.

Executives flood blockchain gaming firms ahead of 2025’s AAA launches

Binance to Increase Presence in Poland in Compliance With Local Regulations

Binance to Increase Presence in Poland in Compliance With Local RegulationsBinance has unveiled intentions to broaden its activities in Poland, another EU member state where the global cryptocurrency exchange is registered. The coin trading platform plans to develop its Polish entity, recruit local talent and launch educational initiatives. Crypto Exchange Binance Moves Forward With Plans to Expand Operations in Poland Binance, the world’s largest digital […]

Executives flood blockchain gaming firms ahead of 2025’s AAA launches