1. Home
  2. Tokens

Tokens

Crypto VC: Token investing and the next bull run with Digital Wave Finance

Cointelegraph sits down with Digital Wave Finance to talk about investment strategies and what could catalyze the next bull run.

Venture capital has been a key driver for myriad startups in the blockchain space. Founders know how competitive it can be to secure valuable VC funding that can keep the lights on and employees paid during the critical first days of a new project.

In a new interview series, Cointelegraph sits down with executives at some of the most active funds investing in the crypto space to understand their perspectives, hear about their successes and failures, and find out what gets them excited about a new project in the Web3 space.

This week, Cointelegraph spoke with Andrei Grachev, co-founder of crypto trading entity Digital Wave Finance (DWF) and managing partner of market maker and multistage Web3 investment firm DWF Labs. DWF Labs has been highly active since late 2022, having invested in the Telegram Open Network (TON), Orbs, Radix, Crypto GPT (now Layer AI) and others.

Cointelegraph: It feels like DWF Labs emerged from nowhere and started aggressively taking over the industry. Tell us more about the history of the fund and the background of the partners.

Andrei Grachev: DWF Labs started operating in late 2021, founded by experienced partners from DWF, a highly successful high-frequency trading entity that had been operating since 2018. We recognized the potential of blockchain technology and wanted to explore investment opportunities in the industry. After making several small investments and token allocations, we refined our investment strategy and risk tolerance. Since then, we have been actively investing in promising projects and providing long-term financial support on a regular basis.

CT: DWF Labs invests exclusively in tokens. Many players in the industry consider this approach to be market-making. Can you explain the rationale behind this decision and why you believe investing in tokens is the best approach?

AG: First of all, let me clarify that every project we work on has different deal components. While some involve pure venture investment, others may include token purchases. Over the past 12 to 18 months, we have seen an increasing number of market makers entering the investment space. While I cannot speak for the entire industry, it appears to me that market makers offer significant support to projects that is crucial to their growth.

For example, market makers typically have established relationships with exchanges, and they can help projects with listing introductions. However, it is up to the exchange to accept the recommendations or not. Another advantage of working with market makers is that they can provide liquidity support to tokens when it is needed. In other words, market makers offer value beyond just executing trades, and this is why we believe that investing in tokens is the best approach.

CT: How do you evaluate the risks associated with investing in tokens, and what steps do you take to mitigate those risks? Are there any particular metrics or criteria you use to assess the potential of a token?

AG: As a Web3 investment firm, we have developed various investment theses over time to evaluate the risks and potential of a project. While we cannot fully disclose our current investment strategy, we have identified several verticals that we are interested in supporting. On our website, we categorize our investments into nine macro-categories, allowing us to diversify our risks within each vertical by selecting a few projects with significantly different attributes.

For example, if we identify a growing vertical where multiple players are developing or building value, we look at the possibility of supporting more than one project. If a project has a clear emphasis on infrastructure, the next project we select might be more focused on the B2B side, and the next one on retail. This approach provides us with a comprehensive coverage of the spectrum of an industry vertical.

When evaluating the potential of a token, we use various metrics and criteria that are specific to each project and vertical. We analyze the market size, competition, team experience and track record, tokenomics, and community engagement, among other factors. We also conduct due diligence and consult with industry experts to ensure that the project has a solid foundation and strong potential for growth. While investing in tokens does carry inherent risks, we believe that a diversified approach combined with thorough research and analysis can help mitigate those risks and generate positive returns for our investors.

Portfolio companies 

CT: What does the ideal portfolio company for DWF look like? What do you prioritize: The idea, personality of a founder, a team or traction?

AG: Our investment portfolio is diverse, but there are a few categories that stand out due to their weight in terms of the number of investments. Decentralized finance and trading, metaverse and GameFi, and infrastructure and enterprise are the categories that seem to have captured our attention the most.

When it comes to prioritizing investment factors, potential market adoption should be the primary consideration. This is because a great idea or product that doesn’t have a large potential user base will not be successful in the long run. Addressable market size is also an important factor, as it helps to determine the potential revenue and growth prospects of a company.

Recent: ETF filings changed the Bitcoin narrative overnight — Ledger CEO

However, even with a large potential market and a great product, the ability of the team to execute is essential for success. A talented and experienced team with a track record of success will increase the likelihood of successful execution and bring the product to market efficiently.

Grachev at the Meta Era Summit 2023. Source: X

Finally, while buzz and hype can be useful indicators of market demand and potential, they can also be misleading and should be taken with a grain of salt. It is important to evaluate the underlying fundamentals and potential for long-term success rather than being swayed solely by hype or trends in the market.

CT: Among others, you invested in TON and EOS. Both projects have a complicated history and a controversial reputation in the industry. What exactly did you find attractive in these projects?

AG: We invested in TON and EOS due to their potential for market adoption and addressable market size. Both projects were highly ambitious and aimed to address fundamental issues within the blockchain industry, such as scalability and usability. We were also impressed with the teams behind each project and their ability to execute on their vision, despite the challenges they faced. While there were certainly controversies and setbacks along the way, we believed that these projects had the potential to make a significant impact in the industry, and we were willing to take the risk. Ultimately, our decision to invest in TON and EOS was based on a thorough analysis of their potential for long-term success, rather than their current buzz or hype status within the industry.

CT: One of your recent investments is Crypto GPT. What is that?

AG: As outlined in our investment thesis, we strive to mitigate risk by diversifying our portfolio within specific industry verticals. This approach allows us to balance potential profits with the possibility of losses. Our investment in Crypto GPT occurred during a period when we were supporting various AI projects. While the initial version of Crypto GPT may not have been impressive, we believed our investment could have facilitated further development and led to something innovative in the market. It is premature to write off the project entirely based on its current implementation. For example, the first iPhone did not have the copy/paste feature, but subsequent iterations improved upon the initial model. The Crypto GPT team is actively developing and launching new products, and we look forward to seeing the results in the long run.

CT: What is the best way for the startup to catch your interest?

AG: Our investment strategy is a combination of various assessment criteria, such as the team, market, traction, competitive landscape and more. As we receive a high volume of funding applications monthly, we prioritize projects that catch our attention with something unique and extraordinary. This is what we would have referred to as the USP, or “unique selling proposition,” in traditional marketing jargon. We value when projects showcase their strengths, whether it be in their community or traction, as it allows us to easily identify potential gems and initiate our due diligence process.

CT: What is your fastest-growing portfolio company?

AG: There are several fast-growing projects in our portfolio, making it challenging to focus on just one when highlighting them. However, some projects have managed to grow their communities tremendously, such as Yield Guild Games, which has accelerated the adoption of GameFi; Conflux, with its signature partnership with China Telecom; and Coin98, which has seen massive adoption in Southeast Asia. Notably, Synthetix is a groundbreaking financial primitive that enables the creation of synthetic assets. Syscoin has been working for years to perfect a solution to the blockchain trilemma, and Fetch.ai offers comprehensive tools for developing, deploying and monetizing applications.

CT: How do you find the best deals?

AG: I have to give credit to my partners and our team, who work tirelessly to stay informed and scout for new projects while evaluating the potential of existing ones. We also attend industry events to connect with the community, which is still very much connected through “decentralized human nodes.” These events provide us with an opportunity to network and expand our connections, which is crucial for discovering promising deals.

CT: Many big names — including a16z, Shima and others — are investing in Web3 gaming, but all the metaverse and gaming projects seem to be overestimated. Decentraland reportedly had just 38 daily “active users” at one point in a $1.3 billion ecosystem. What do you think about Web3 games and metaverses?

AG: We, like other VCs, are keeping a close eye on the Web3 gaming and metaverse spaces. While we see the potential for these projects to revolutionize the gaming and virtual world industries, we also acknowledge the risks and challenges they face. It is true that some projects have been overestimated, but this is a nascent industry, and we are still in the early stages of experimentation. As with any emerging technology, it takes time to develop and gain widespread adoption.

About the industry

CT: How will the industry change in the near future and in the long run?

AG: The industry has grown so big that it is hard to speak about it without diving deep into each of the verticals. For example, it would be impossible to ignore the tremendous impact that AI is bringing to the world. Also, the incredible growth of GameFi has already contributed significantly to growing adoption. And certainly, DeFi is here to stay.

Decentralized exchanges have been the talk of the day ever since FTX went bankrupt. More recently, there seems to be a renaissance of memecoins. There has been a tremendous amount of building behind the noise of token price. We are always interested in supporting builders. At the moment, we are particularly keen to support infrastructure projects, from layers to IoT and real-world assets. We believe that these projects will play a critical role in shaping the future of the industry.

CT: Some critics of token investing argue that many tokens are not real investments but speculative assets subject to price manipulation and volatility, which negatively influence the entire industry. How do you respond to this criticism, and what evidence can you provide to support the idea that token investing is a legitimate form of investment?

AG: Token investing is often criticized as a form of speculation that lacks legitimacy as an investment vehicle. However, tokens are attractive to both retail and institutional investors because of their liquidity. Tokens can be viewed as the next evolution of shares traded on a stock exchange. In traditional markets, the democratization of access to the stock market through platforms like Robinhood and eToro has given retail investors the ability to organize themselves into communities that can further their investment thesis beyond the market rationale. The growth of memecoins is a prime example of this community approach to crypto investment.

Total memecoin trading volumes. Weekly volume in black. Cumulative volume in green. Source: Dune

While some memecoins have evolved into projects with ambitious ecosystems, such as Floki, others exist solely as speculative tools. Ultimately, investing is about profit, and an investor who doesn’t want to profit is called a philanthropist. Therefore, token investing should be evaluated based on its potential for generating returns, as well as its potential risks and rewards. Some tokens will generate handsome profits based on their technological value, while others will thrive solely due to their growing community of enthusiasts.

CT: The recent collapses of FTX, 3AC and others didn’t add any trust or optimism to the crypto space, while recent events indicate that traditional financial institutions and the current financial system overall are in crisis. In your opinion, what’s the best way to overcome these challenges?

AG: Finance is a highly complex field, at a crossroads between the economy on the one hand and government regulation on the other. Financial institutions are a vital part of the economy in day-to-day terms, and it is unfortunate when such institutions fail to comply with regulations or intentionally implement malpractices.

As for overcoming challenges, there are a few approaches that could be taken. Firstly, increasing transparency and accountability within the industry is crucial. This can be achieved through regulation and self-policing by the industry itself. Secondly, embracing technological innovation and new business models could lead to more efficient and inclusive financial systems. Lastly, educating the public and promoting financial literacy is essential in building trust and confidence in the industry. Overall, a combination of these approaches could lead to a more resilient, trustworthy financial system.

CT: This is a fast-growing multibillion-dollar industry, but still, for the general public, it might look like something related to illicit activities such as money laundering. What can change this perception?

AG: This concern seems outdated, as over the past few years, there has been significant adoption of blockchain technology and Web3. Many portfolio companies have created a positive impact for communities globally. For example, World Mobile Token disrupts the trillion-dollar telecommunications industry by enabling connectivity for everyone through a sharing economy and distributing network ownership. [...] It’s essential to focus on builders and the real value they bring to the world to dispel negative perceptions about the crypto industry.

CT: What topics in the industry are the hottest nowadays? Just 1.5 years ago, nonfungible tokens were everywhere. Now, every primary protocol has its own NFT marketplace but very few users. Are NFTs gone, or do you expect them to evolve into something? What’s the next big thing?

AG: Undeniably, NFTs took the world by storm, demonstrating that massive crypto adoption is possible. Although their initial use case was closely related to self-expression, NFTs represented a mere speculative tool for some. In other words, the use case was not the most solid to build upon, but it was indeed a good starting point. Now, we see many more innovative use cases in NFTs, and we are sure that many more will come very soon.

For example, with the advent of advanced AI engines for art creation, the ability to launch a new NFT collection is no longer limited to those with the technical skills to execute; rather, the opportunity has been democratized to empower anyone with an idea to execute rapidly and easily. This simplification and democratization is already spilling over into no-code development, gaming and entertainment more broadly, like music and filmmaking. Trading will also be significantly impacted by AI integration, and we are already seeing some projects emerging in this field.

CT: In your opinion, what could catalyze the next bull run?

AG: GameFi will continue to lead in mass adoption as the lowest-hanging fruit. What is particularly interesting will be to see how AI integrations bring into existence a new breed of extremely interactive gaming experiences. For example, AI-driven nonplayer characters will have emotions and personalities of their own and will interact with players far beyond their scripted scope of existence. Therefore, we should keep a close eye on how AI will impact all industries.

CT: There are alarmists who think AI will “steal jobs” and positive thinkers who are sure it will make our lives better and easier. What is your point of view? What significant changes can AI bring to the crypto industry?

AG: The idea that AI will steal jobs is real, but in more practical terms, people who know how to master AI integration will be replacing other people’s jobs. AI, on its own, is not going to steal anyone’s job unless someone programs it to do so. There might be many ethical repercussions related to the first outcome of AI integrations. It is not too far-fetched to imagine AI being regulated in a similar way to finance, to a certain extent.

Magazine: 6 Questions for JW Verret — the blockchain professor who’s tracking the money

As for the positive impact of AI, it has the potential to bring significant change to the crypto industry. AI can be used for advanced data analysis and predictive modeling, helping traders make informed decisions and identify market trends. It can also be used to enhance security measures, detecting and preventing fraud and cyberattacks. Additionally, AI can assist in developing more efficient and effective blockchain protocols, leading to faster and more scalable networks. Overall, I believe AI will play a crucial role in the growth and development of the crypto industry, and its impact will be mostly positive if implemented ethically and responsibly.

Bitcoin corporate treasury shareholder proposal submitted to Meta

Tokenization is “securitization done on steroids” — Franklin Templeton CEO

Speaking at CNBC’s Delivering Alpha event, Jenny Johnson discussed how digital assets are disrupting securitization and the financial markets.

Securitization, a practice with over 50 years of history, is undergoing a dramatic transformation, believes Jenny Johnson, CEO of Franklin Templeton, one of the world’s largest asset managers.

During CNBC’s Delivering Alpha event, Johnson noted that tokenization — the process of converting asset ownership rights into digital tokens on a blockchain — is akin to “securitization done on steroids,” a term often used to describe something that exceeds expectations.

Johnson’s remarks were part of an analysis of the future of alternative investment vehicles. The executive noted that available capital and technology disruption have been attracting more companies and CEOs to invest in “things for the future,” like blockchain technology. Johnson said:

“One is it allows a payment mechanism. Number two, it allows smart contracts to be programmed into the token. And three, because it’s a general ledger, it has a source of truth. So whoever has that token, all rights in that token are granted to that person.”

Johnson used Rihanna as an example to illustrate her point of view. In February, the singer released one of its popular songs as a nonfungible token (NFT), allowing holders to partially earn royalties on streaming. “My favorite example is Rihanna,” she noted about the NFT collection launched just before the Super Bowl.

“I know she’s just testing the market in these 300 NFTs [...]. Well, why can she do that? She can do it because when Spotify plays a Rihanna song, it can capture the smart contract, execute and say: ‘I owe royalties here so nobody has to be involved in it.' And it can take the fractional payment and go to Frank, a big Rihanna fan.”

Athletes can also benefit from tokenization, according to Johnson:

“Think [about] athletes are going to sign a big contract. They’ll say to their fans 'I’m going to sell off tokens worth 10% of my future revenue stream. I’m going to sell 100,000 tokens and boom, the fans are probably going to pay a premium for it. So it will be a way and if you think about it, it’s just securitization done on steroids.”

Johnson has been with Franklin Templeton for more than 30 years and currently sits at the top of the company’s executive leadership as president and CEO. Franklin, a $1.5 trillion asset manager with offices across the world, is one of the companies waiting for regulatory approval in the United States for a spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF).

Magazine: Tokenizing music royalties as NFTs could help the next Taylor Swift

Bitcoin corporate treasury shareholder proposal submitted to Meta

FTX hacker’s wallet stirs as Ethereum ETFs prepare for U.S. debut

The data reveals two separate transactions in which the exploiter moved 2,500 ETH, each valued at $4 million.

Almost a year following the FTX hack that resulted in the loss of $600 million in tokens, on-chain data indicated recent activity in the wallet of the perpetrator, identified as 0x3e957, on Saturday, Sept. 30, 2023. This is occurring closely to the launch of Ethereum-based ETF in the United States.

Based on on-chain data sourced from Spotonchain, the individual responsible for the FTX incident recently activated their address after a prolonged period. Presently, the wallet contains a substantial sum of $16.75 million in ETH tokens.

The data reveals two separate transactions in which the exploiter moved 2,500 ETH, each valued at $4 million. Such transfers are often linked to selling activity, potentially exerting downward pressure on prices and affecting smaller investors. The ETH price could take a bullish trend soon with the launch of the various Ethereum ETFs in the United States.

The introduction of Ethereum-based ETFs by several companies on October 2, 2023, marks another potential factor influencing ETH's price. If all goes according to plan, and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) grants accelerated approval for up to nine ETF products on that date, it could have a significant impact.

Related: Valkyrie backtracks on Ether futures contract purchases until ETF launch

Simultaneously, the looming risk of a U.S. government shutdown may pose a potential threat to Bitcoin (BTC) prices due to its adverse effects on the banking sector.

Magazine: Can you trust crypto exchanges after the collapse of FTX?

Bitcoin corporate treasury shareholder proposal submitted to Meta

Paradigm accuses SEC of bypassing rules in Binance lawsuit

Paradigm pointed out that the SEC is attempting to use the concerning accusations in its complaint as a means to alter the law, all without adhering to the established rulemaking process.

Paradigm, a crypto venture capital firm, has criticized the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for bypassing the standard rulemaking procedures in their current legal action against the cryptocurrency exchange Binance.

In a statement released on Friday, Sept. 29, Paradigm pointed out that the SEC is attempting to use the concerning accusations in its complaint as a means to alter the law, all without adhering to the established rulemaking process. Paradigm firmly believes that the SEC is exceeding its regulatory boundaries, and we strongly oppose this tactic, they further stated.

Back in June, the SEC initiated a legal action against Binance, accusing them of multiple violations of securities laws, such as operating without the necessary registration as an exchange, broker-dealer, or clearing agency. Paradigm also underscored that the SEC has been pursuing similar cases against various cryptocurrency exchanges lately and voiced apprehension that the SEC's stance "could fundamentally reshape our comprehension of securities law in several critical aspects."

Screenshot of Paradigm's amicus brief  Source: Paradigm

Additionally, Paradigm highlighted concerns regarding the shortcomings of the SEC's application of the Howey Test. The SEC often relies on the Howey Test, originating from a 1946 U.S. Supreme Court case involving citrus groves, as a means to determine whether transactions meet the criteria for investment contracts and, thus, fall under securities regulations.

In its amicus brief, Paradigm asserted that many assets are actively marketed, purchased, and traded based on their profit prospects. Nevertheless, the SEC has consistently exempted them from being classified as securities. The brief further pointed out instances such as gold, silver and fine art, underscoring that merely having the potential for value appreciation does not inherently classify their sale as a security transaction.

Related: Binance Russia buyer tightlipped on owners, denies CZ involvement

Circle, the issuer of the USDC Stablecoin, has recently become a participant in the ongoing legal dispute between Binance and the SEC. Circle holds the view that the US SEC should not categorize stablecoins, including BUSD and USDC, as securities.

Circle contends that these assets ought not to be categorized as securities, primarily due to the fact that individuals acquiring these stablecoins do not foresee deriving profits solely from their acquisition.

Magazine: Crypto regulation: Does SEC Chair Gary Gensler have the final say?

Bitcoin corporate treasury shareholder proposal submitted to Meta

Bahrain’s Bank ABC using JPMorgan’s Onyx blockchain for cross-border payments

After two years of experiments, JPMorgan and the Bahraini bank will offer U.S. dollar payment settlement in several countries, with plans to expand to euro service as well.

Bahrain-based Bank ABC will use JPMorgan’s Onyx Coin Systems for blockchain-based cross-border payments in a soft, or limited, launch. The new service will be more cost effective and reduce settlement times relative to traditional solutions.

Bank ABC will at first use the U.S. dollar in transactions involving Bahrain, the United States, United Kingdom, Singapore and Hong Kong. The partners are planning more locations and transactions with the euro as well. Programmable payments are also in the works.

The service has been launched after two years of experiments. Global head of Onyx Coin Systems Naveen Mallela said in a statement:

“This enables cross-border commercial transactions to be executed between Bahrain and US corridors instantly, atomically and with certainty.”

The new service was developed in close collaboration with the Central Bank of Bahrain (CBB). The CBB supervised a trial in January 2022 in which JPM Coin was used to settle payments between the national Aluminium Bahrain and its U.S. counterparties through Bank ABC.

Related: JPMorgan sees advantages in deposit tokens over stablecoins for commercial bank blockchains

Bank ABC has the first partnership with JPMorgan’s blockchain service in the Middle East, according to the statement. Earlier this year, Onyx linked up with six Indian banks in a pilot project to offer USD settlement. It also partnered with the German Siemens conglomerate for settlement in euros. JPM Coin was launched in 2020.

Bahrain has been taking steps to modernize its financial system in recent years. Binance received a license in the kingdom in March 2022, beating Dubai as the first member of the Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf to license an international crypto exchange by a few days. Binance partnered with EazyPay to provide retail payment services in Bahrain, although it is not clear whether that service is still available.

Magazine: Best and worst countries for crypto taxes — plus crypto tax tips

Bitcoin corporate treasury shareholder proposal submitted to Meta

Redefining Money: America’s digital currency dilemma

As the United States House Financial Services Committee looks to further impede the introduction of a digital dollar, where does this resistance to a CBDC stem from?

On Wednesday, Sept. 20, the United States House Financial Services Committee marked up two bills to curb the issuance of a central bank digital currency (CBDC). One of the bills would stop the Federal Reserve from running any test programs on CBDCs without congressional approval, while the other would stop federal banks from using CBDCs for some services and products. 

The principal political adversaries to a digital dollar are heavyweights such as Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Florida governor Ron DeSantis, who have thrown their hats into the ring to become president a year from November.

In July, DeSantis said that CBDCs would never happen under his administration, citing concerns over consumers losing power over their own money. Kennedy, on the other hand, a known proponent of Bitcoin, is rallying against the digital dollar as it will “vastly magnify the government’s power to suffocate dissent by cutting off access to funds with a keystroke.“

In May, Cointelegraph reported that according to its own research, more than 130 countries were at some stage of research into a CBDC, and only eight had rejected the idea outright. These countries are diverse, from France and Switzerland to Haiti and Bhutan. So, the question must be asked: Why would a country like the United States be so opposed to having its own digital currency?

The idea of a CBDC in itself is nothing too taxing. In essence, digital dollars would be based on blockchain technology rather than having traditional dollars moving around between accounts. That would dramatically decrease transfer times, cut fees, and do away with the “middlemen” — the intermediaries along the way who slow things down and take a cut for themselves.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation found that in 2021, there were still 5.9 million “unbanked’ households in the United States, a massive number by any standard.

A CBDC would mean that the Federal Reserve would effectively oversee all the bank transfers in the country, as there would be no alternative. And having everything under one roof means one mistake or failure would affect everyone rather than be limited to one bank, for instance.

Recent: Indian state governments spur blockchain adoption in public administration

But perhaps the biggest argument against a CBDC is that, for cryptocurrency purists, having a central institution overseeing a currency is the very thing crypto was designed to avoid. Why now make a U-turn?

Political motivations play a significant role in the discussion in the United States. In March 2022, President Joseph Biden said his administration would “place the highest urgency on research and development efforts into the potential design and deployment options of a United States CBDC.”

This provided fodder for the Republican party to come out against the plan, citing invasion of privacy and claiming it was another form of government control. DeSantis even came out with an Orwellian prediction of the government stopping its citizens from buying fossil fuels or guns if such legislation were in place.

This is not to say that the U.S. hasn’t looked into a CBDC, as it has extensively.

In 2020, the Federal Reserve launched Project Hamilton to study the viability of a CBDC. By 2022, it had developed a system that took elements from the workings of Bitcoin but moved away from its rigid blockchain backbone. The result was a system that can process 1.7 million transactions per second, light years ahead of the Bitcoin blockchain and quicker even than Visa, which can deal with about 65,000 transactions per second.

David Millar, data center coordinator at Santander, told Cointelegraph: “The leaps forward they made during Project Hamilton were truly staggering. When we heard of the progress they were making, we believed that our entire infrastructure would need to be completely revamped within the next five years.”

Nevertheless, the project completed its initial phase in December 2022 and went no further. Once again, voices of dissent from Congress attacked the project, saying it had been carried out solely with academics and the public sector in mind and the average citizen would not benefit. Millar added:

“The time and effort that went into Hamilton and the results they produced; it’s a tragedy that most of it will never see the light of day.”

The issue of privacy is one of the most prominent foes of the digital dollar. The main argument of the dissenters is that if there is to be a digital dollar, it should effectively be like the cash dollar is now, with its benefits of anonymity coupled with the power and speed of a cryptocurrency. Those who favor a digital dollar argue that we already have such a thing, but it’s just not called that yet. Credit card money is digital for all intents and purposes, and are any of us mailing cash to Amazon to pay for things?

The world is moving toward a cashless society, and the U.S. is no exception. In 2022, only 18% of all U.S. payments were made in cash, down from 31% in 2016.

Magazine: ‘AI has killed the industry’: EasyTranslate boss on adapting to change

The U.S. is also a country of strange contradictions. While it surges ahead in many areas, such as technology, its banking system remains rooted in the traditional, with check payments still being the norm. Dragging a whole nation away from that is a tall order.

So, what does the future hold for a potential U.S. CBDC? Well, very little. Project Hamilton closed with no indication of a second phase, and according to Darrell Duffie, a professor of finance at Stanford’s Graduate School of Business, while work is continuing, it has slowed to a snail’s pace, and “nobody is charging ahead openly.”

It seems for the foreseeable future, this will be one part of the cryptosphere where the U.S. is not a pioneer.

Bitcoin corporate treasury shareholder proposal submitted to Meta

Insurance, agriculture, and real estate: how asset tokenization is reshaping the status quo

During a panel moderated by Cointelegraph editor-in-chief Kristina Lucrezia Cornèr at Swiss Web3 Fest, industry experts provided insights into how tokenization is enabling solutions never seen before.

The Boston Consulting Group estimates the tokenization of real-world assets could become a $16 trillion industry in the coming years. Its impact, however, goes well beyond financial figures, and can help people in developing countries to find new ways to deal with real-world problems.

During a panel moderated by Cointelegraph's editor-in-chief Kristina Lucrezia Cornèr at Swiss Web3 Fest, industry experts provided insights into how tokenization can be applied to real-world assets, and how it is enabling solutions never seen before.

"Our farmers, in Kenya, receive their payouts days after the harvesting season ends. If they have less yield than expected, then they receive a payout immediately. In the traditional insurance space, they need to wait six months. And that can mean the end of a family's business," explained Christoph Mussenbrock from decentralized insurance protocol Etherisc about tokenization solutions for agricultural production.

According to Mussenbrock, there's an increasing demand from traditional insurance companies for on-chain solutions. "This is currently happening as we speak. That is a huge change. We see that traditional insurance companies are somehow dipping into this."

Stephan Rind, from BrickMark Group, noted that asset tokenization can deliver access to financial products that are currently unavailable to most people, thus helping to close a gap in wealth distribution.

"Number one in financial inclusion, obviously you can have a number of participants that can participate in a financial instrument, and you have the democratization of capital [...] everything from real estate to animals, to all the things that you can have in traditional finance, that could actually be tokenized and represented in a digital financial instrument," Rind commented.

Carlos Mazzi, from Finka, shared his experience of tokenizing La Pradera, a cattle ranch in Bolivia with 3,000 hectares of grassland and over 3,500 cows. "We tokenize the value creation of what we call from grass to cash. It's the tokenization of value creation. The conversion of grass into protein, and into cash through a great nature given machine, which is a cow. We were early pioneers and this was very challenging [...] it represented a lot of financial engineering, legal framework, etc. to create a revenue token. So it has been fantastic [...] The only thing that has not developed the way we anticipated is the market adoption, and it's a systemic issue that, we hope, will be corrected eventually."

Tokenized ranch La Pradera in Bolivia. Source: Finka Gmbh

The adoption issue will be overtaken by central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), believes Rind. "It will create billions of people in the world which have a wallet," he noted, adding that regulation will also unlock more capital into asset tokenization.

"We believe that in ten years' time most people will be interacting with Tokens on a daily basis, whether they know it or not," added Jose Fernandez, from Tokengate.

Magazine: How to protect your crypto in a volatile market — Bitcoin OGs and experts weigh in

Bitcoin corporate treasury shareholder proposal submitted to Meta

XRP lawyer John Deaton joins LBRY case as amicus curiae

Deaton is known for his active engagements in legal proceedings and discussions surrounding cryptocurrency regulations and legal actions.

Lawyer John Deaton, who represents numerous XRP token holders in the Ripple- Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) lawsuit, has formally submitted his notice of appearance as an Amicus Curiae in the LBRY lawsuit. 

According to a document submitted on Sept. 14, 2023, to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, Deaton has officially submitted his Notice of Appearance on behalf of Amicus Curiae Naomi Brockwell.

Referring to his submission, Deaton said in a post on X (formerly known as Twitter),

“Win, lose, or draw, we will be in the fight!”

Notably, Naomi Brockwell serves as the founder of Crypto Law, a platform dedicated to offering insights and updates on legal and regulatory developments related to cryptocurrencies in the United States, in collaboration with Deaton.

The lawyer is known for his advocacy for the rights of cryptocurrency investors and his active engagements in legal proceedings and discussions surrounding cryptocurrency regulations and legal actions.

In March 2021, the United States SEC initiated a legal action against LBRY, alleging that the company unlawfully sold LBC tokens without registering with the agency, as required by law.

On Sept. 7, LBRY filed a notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, seeking to challenge the final judgment entered on July 11 that ordered LBRY to pay a civil penalty and barred it from participating in unregistered offerings of crypto asset securities in the future.

In July 2023, the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire issued the final judgment in the US SEC vs. LBRY lawsuit. The ruling said that LBRY was liable for violating Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933.

Related: SEC’s Gary Gensler to hold firm on crypto enforcement in Senate hearing

The outcome of the LBRY case was seen as having potential implications for the XRP lawsuit. However, on July 14, 2023, U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres issued a summary judgment in Ripple's favor, determining that the sale of XRP tokens to retail buyers did not constitute securities.

Collect this article as an NFT to preserve this moment in history and show your support for independent journalism in the crypto space.

Magazine: Crypto regulation — Does SEC Chair Gary Gensler have the final say?

Bitcoin corporate treasury shareholder proposal submitted to Meta

Are NFT markets in a death spiral or ready for a resurgence?

NFTs have taken a massive hit since the 2021 bull market, but some experts say they could make a comeback.

Nonfungible tokens (NFTs) saw a massive surge in popularity in 2021, accompanied by sky-high prices, but the market has since come crashing back to earth, and it’s unclear whether there will be a resurgence. 

NFTs are unique digital tokens recorded on a blockchain to certify ownership and authenticity. They can’t be copied or substituted but can be transferred and sold by their owner.

According to analytics platform NFTGo, the NFT market cap valued in Ether (ETH) is down 40.59% over the past year at the time of writing, with trading volume down 40.81%.

The market cap in U.S. dollars is down 41.16%, and its volume has dropped 66.77%. At the same time, market sentiment is ranked 13 out of 100, with an overall rating of “cold.”

The NFT market has fallen even further in the latter half of 2023. Source: NFTGo

Arno Bauer, senior solution architect at BNB Chain, told Cointelegraph that from a utility perspective, NFT projects are increasingly adding value and that this growth in functionality is where the future of NFTs likely lies. 

Bauer said the NFT market is showing “promising signs of innovation and creativity,” which holds great potential for the growth and evolution of the tech.

Related: Crypto lawyer about SEC: ‘Problematic to imply all NFTs are securities’

“Market sentiment, cultural shifts towards digital ownership, and the potential for NFTs to be integrated into various aspects of our lives also contribute to a positive outlook for the future of NFTs,” he said.

“While current market conditions might seem subdued, the ongoing innovation and potential for integration with both digital and physical worlds suggest that NFTs have not had their day and that their continued relevance and growth are highly probable,” Bauer added.

NFTs in the long term

As for long-term use cases, Bauer said NFTs will “likely evolve” over time and become increasingly linked to real-world assets, such as property ownership or unique physical goods.

Currently, NFTs have been most successful in the art world, with some selling for tens of millions of dollars.

Digital artist Pak sold an NFT project titled “The Merge” for $91.8 million on Nifty Gateway in 2021, while Mike Winkelmann, also known as Beeple, sold “Everydays: The First 5000 Days” for $69.3 million via Christie’s auction house the same year. 

Blockchain games also use NFTs to represent in-game items such as weapons and armor, and there is speculation the tech will make the jump to mainstream games. Various types of music assets are also being sold as one-of-a-kind NFTs.

Bauer thinks that as more robust technology provides enhanced use cases and ownership security, NFTs will likely become more attractive to mainstream markets.

He speculated that NFTs could link to financial instruments, representing shares in companies or investment funds, and social achievements, where they could symbolize badges of accomplishment in various fields.

“Beyond art, the ability to tokenize unique assets and provide verifiable ownership will create numerous applications across various domains,” Bauer said.

“Collaborations with traditional industries, technological advancements, clear regulatory frameworks and educational efforts can significantly boost NFT utility and adoption.”

“Addressing sustainability concerns could make them more appealing to a broader audience,” he added.

NFTs have the potential to make a comeback 

Jason Bailey, co-founder and CEO of NFT tool and self-custody solution ClubNFT, told Cointelegraph he thinks “NFTs will come back and go mainstream” because crypto and NFTs rebound cyclically, just like previous tech crashes. 

According to data gathering platform Statista, the NFT market is projected to continue growing in revenue, users and market capitalization.

As of 2023, there are 13.95 million NFT users, but that’s expected to hit 19.31 million users by 2027.

However, Bailey believes NFTs currently have some issues, most of which were amplified by rampant market speculation, that need to be solved before NFTs can go mainstream. 

He said NFTs and the ecosystem around them are so complex that almost everyone is still vulnerable to many risks they may not even know about.

“Many of us have been trying to educate and onboard people into the space thoughtfully so they can be safe, but the truth is that NFTs won’t go mainstream until the complexity is replaced with a safe-by-default easy path,” Bailey said.

“For example, the vast majority of people don’t realize that an NFT is almost always at risk in a sense, except for fully on-chain NFTs, which are a truly tiny fraction.”

“The steps needed to protect the art from disappearing, and prevent the NFT from breaking, are complicated, time-consuming and error-prone,” he added.

Related: AI-based tools bring security and transparency to the NFT market

Bailey believes that in the long term, NFTs or similar tech could prove invaluable in validating digital documents such as marriage certificates, diplomas and licenses.

Overall, he thinks NFTs solve too many of the current problems associated with digital ownership — including scarcity, authentication, provenance and provable ownership — to be ignored.

“We need to build infrastructure now, during the bear market, for smoother onboarding and to protect NFT adopters from malicious actors in the next NFT bull market,” he said.

“Once these issues are solved, NFTs will absolutely go mainstream because the train of digital ownership left the station decades ago, and there is no stopping it.”

Meaningful projects could be a game changer for NFTs 

Speaking to Cointelegraph, Andy Ku, founder and CEO of digital content Web3 ecosystem Altava Group, said he thinks the previous highs in the NFT market were based on a hype cycle, so it’ll be hard for an individual NFT to reach such lofty heights again.

According to CoinGecko, many of the top NFT collections have seen significant drops in value over the past year. 

At the time of writing, Bored Ape Yacht Club has fallen by 67.1%, CryptoPunks by 33.2%, Mutant Ape Yacht Club by 59.2% and Azuki by 49.3%.

Ku believes that if we can see more meaningful NFT projects on the market offering tangible benefits to more people, then it’s possible to have the combined volume bring the overall market value up.

Related: What’s next for NFTs and Web3 in the age of the creator economy?

“NFTs should offer value and utility beyond just a digital art or PFP. The two areas I particularly believe in are asset-backed NFTs and a membership NFT,” he said.

“NFT’s core value of being an immutable representation of something is a great fit for assets and membership.”

NFTs for subscription, membership-based models and loyalty programs are starting to gain traction, with examples in hospitality venues and gyms already on the market.

“In terms of asset-backed NFTs, master artworks, real estate and precious metals like gold are all good examples of assets in which people believe,” Ku said.

“NFTs would make a great proof-of-ownership for these assets as well as being extremely portable,” he added.

Bitcoin corporate treasury shareholder proposal submitted to Meta

Ripple’s CLO calls SEC’s latest filing “Hypocritical Pivot”

He pointed out that Gensler had requested an urgent appeal while simultaneously asserting that crypto regulations and rules were clear and must be adhered to by the industry.

Stuart Alderoty, Ripple's Chief Legal Officer and General Counsel in the SEC v. Ripple Labs case, has characterized the United States Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) latest submission as a "contradictory shift" and contends that it holds little sway. 

Following the recent filing by the U.S. SEC to reinforce its interlocutory appeal, Stuart Alderoty, Chief Legal Officer at Ripple, commented on X, referring to the submission as another instance of a "hypocritical pivot." Alderoty highlighted what he sees as Chairman Gary Gensler's inconsistency, manipulative actions and appetite for expanded regulation.

He pointed out that Gensler had requested an urgent appeal while simultaneously asserting that crypto regulations and rules were clear and must be adhered to by the industry.

“Another SEC filing, another hypocritical pivot… After years of its chairman saying the ‘rules are clear and must be obeyed,’ the SEC now cries that an appeal is urgently needed to resolve these knotty legal problems.”

Attorney James K. Filan took a dig at the SEC, ridiculing their newfound concern for preserving judicial resources. He pointed out the SEC's previous attempt to pause all proceedings in the case.

Renowned pro-XRP attorney John E. Deaton remarked that those not well-versed in the U.S. SEC v. Ripple Labs case might find Ripple CLO Alderoty's response to the SEC to be harsh. However, for those familiar with the case, Alderoty's characterization of the SEC as "hypocritical" is simply a reflection of the federal judge presiding over the matter.

Related: Rep. Tom Emmer sponsors amendment to limit SEC’s crypto oversight

In the Grayscale lawsuit, federal judges have criticized the US SEC's assertions as "arbitrary and capricious." Meanwhile, in the Ripple XRP case, Judge Netburn employed the term "hypocrisy" to characterize the SEC's contradictory stances. Additionally, Ripple's Executive Chairman, Chris Larsen, anticipates that the SEC's approach of enforcing regulations through legal actions may come to a conclusion in the near future.

Magazine: Crypto regulation — Does SEC Chair Gary Gensler have the final say?

Bitcoin corporate treasury shareholder proposal submitted to Meta