1. Home
  2. Tokens

Tokens

Canadian taco franchise uses NFTs for customer loyalty program

A Canadian restaurant franchise is putting their customer loyalty program on the blockchain through a new Tenacious Tacos NFT collection.

With 19 locations across Canada and a plan for expansion into the United States, this $6 million taco franchise wants to capitalize on their growing customer base.

The collection, Tenacious Tacos, allows holders to receive both Web3 and real benefits. Moreover, for those who wish, they can stake their NFTs to earn additional digital rewards.

According to the official statement, staked Tenacious Tacos can be redeemed for rewards such as the chance to win a lifetime of free food or monthly payouts in ETH/WETH.

Previously Landry’s restaurant group, which includes Bubba Gump Shrimp Factory and Rainforest Cafe, introduced a Bitcoin loyalty program. However, in that instance customers were able to earn rewards in Bitcoin (BTC), such as $25 worth of Bitcoin for every $250 spent at one of many restaurants in the brand.

StrEAT’s method simultaneously adds additional value to traditional loyalty programs and utility to NFTs.

A Canadian-based restaurant franchise is adding more utility to the growing number of NFT use cases. The StrEATS franchise plans to utilize NFTs in their new customer loyalty program. 

Related: NFT utility to remedy ticketing dilemmas? Experts weigh in

Joe Klassen, CEO of Joeys Group of Restaurants and founder of the Tenacious Tacos NFT project, highlighted the importance of their community: “The vision with this project is to become closer with the community while simultaneously creating the opportunity for them to share in our growing success.”

The loyalty program’s real-life NFT benefits include a 20% off at all StrEATS locations, VIP event access, and voting rights on new menu features.

In June of this year the major burrito and taco chain Chipotle introduced cryptocurrency payments at nearly 3,000 locations across the U.S. Last month, the chain also announced a crypto giveaway to customers through a digital game.

Solana down 29% in 2025 despite liquidity surge, US crypto stockpile inclusion

Binance to Sell NFT Tickets for Major Italian Soccer Club Lazio

Binance to Sell NFT Tickets for Major Italian Soccer Club LazioCrypto exchange Binance will be offering NFT tickets for the games of one of Italy’s leading soccer teams, Lazio, during the upcoming season in the Italian Serie A championship. Supporters of Lazio will be able to use the tokens to also take advantage of various discounts. Lazio Fans to Buy NFT Tickets From Cryptocurrency Exchange […]

Solana down 29% in 2025 despite liquidity surge, US crypto stockpile inclusion

Crypto contagion deters investors in near term, but fundamentals stay strong

Many experts believe that the recent slew of insolvencies may be good for the market in the long run, weeding out any weak players from the industry.

The past six-odd months have been nothing short of a financial soap opera for the cryptocurrency market, with more drama seemingly unfolding every other day. To this point, since the start of May, a growing number of major crypto entities have been tumbling like dominoes, with the trend likely to continue in the near term.

The contagion, for the lack of a better word, was sparked by the collapse of the Terra ecosystem back in May, wherein the project’s associated digital currencies became worthless almost overnight. Following the event, crypto lending platform Celsius was faced with bankruptcy. Then Zipmex, a Singapore-based cryptocurrency exchange, froze all customer withdrawals, a move that was mirrored by crypto financial service provider Babel Finance late last month.

It is worth noting that since December 2021, nearly $2 trillion have been wiped out from the digital asset industry. And, while markets across the board — including equities and commodities — have been severely affected by the prevailing macro-economic climate, the above-stated slew of collapses have definitely had a role to play in the ongoing crypto drain. To this point, Ben Caselin, head of research and strategy for crypto exchange AAX, told Cointelegraph:

“The contagion has played a big part in the recent downturn, but we cannot ignore the wider market conditions and the change in fiscal policy as important factors playing into price. The situation concerning Celcius, Three Arrows Capital but also Terra is expressive of an over-leveraged system unable to withstand severe market stress. This should in the least serve as a wake up call for the industry.”

He went on to add that increasing mass adoption of digital currencies in the future should be done by expanding the scope of crypto beyond its prevailing “sound money narrative.” Caselin highlighted that the market as a whole now needs to take into account and implement financial practices that are sound and sustainable in the long run.

What do the recent insolvencies mean for the industry?

Felix Xu, CEO of decentralized finance (DeFi) project Bella Protocol and co-founder of ZX Squared Capital, told Cointelegraph that the past month has been a “Lehman moment” of sorts for the crypto market. For the first time in history, this industry has witnessed the insolvency of major asset managers such as Celsius, Voyager and Babel Finance within a matter of months. 

According to his personal research data, while ailing projects like Voyager and Genesis collapsed due to the fact that they had the most exposure to Three Arrows Capital (3AC), the collapse of 3AC, Celsius and Babel Finance emanated due to rogue management practices associated with the assets of their users. Xu added:

“I believe the first wave of forced liquidation and panic selling is now over. As asset managers and funds file for bankruptcies, their crypto collaterals will take a long time to be liquidated. On the other hand, DeFi lending platforms such as MakerDAO, Aave and Compound Finance performed well during this downturn, as they are over-collateralized with strict liquidation rules written into their smart contracts.”

Going forward, he believes that the crypto market is likely to move in correlation with other asset classes including equities, with the industry potentially taking some time to rebuild its lost investor confidence. That said, in Xu’s opinion, what happened last month with the crypto market is nothing new when it comes to the traditional finance space. “We’ve seen it in the 2008 financial crisis and the 1997 Asian financial crisis,” he pointed out.

Recent: Metaverse visionary Neal Stephenson is building a blockchain to uplift creators

Hatu Sheikh, co-founder of DAO Maker — a growth technologies provider for nascent and growing crypto startups — told Cointelegraph that the aftermath of this contagion has been strongly negative but not for the reason many people would imagine:

“A key loss here is that many of the cenrtalized finance platforms that went bankrupt due to the contagion were active onramps to the industry. Their unsustainable and often deceptive means of attracting new industry participants brought millions of people to trickle deep into nonfungible tokens and DeFi.”

In Sheikh’s view, while DeFi onboarding may come to a halt or at least slow down in the near term, many venture capital firms operating within his space have already raised billions and are thus capable of continuing to inject funds into many upcoming startups. “We’ll have a new roster of companies that’ll replace the lost ones’ role of being an onramp to the industry,” he said.

Undisputed damaged to the market’s reputation 

Misha Lederman, director of communications for decentralized peer-to-peer and self-custody crypto wallet Klever, told Cointelegraph that the recent crash has definitely damaged the reputation of the industry but believes that the aforementioned insolvencies have helped cleanse the industry of bad players, adding:

“This presents a huge opportunity for blockchain platforms and crypto communities with a responsibility-driven approach to innovation, in which user funds are protected at all costs. As an industry, we have to be better than the fiat debt system we aim to replace.”

A similar opinion is shared by Shyla Bashyr, public relations and communications lead for UpLift DAO — a permissionless and decentralized platform for token sales and swaps — who told Cointelegraph that the industry has been hit hard and is currently shrouded with more negativity than ever before. 

However, she believes such scenarios are sometimes needed since they present new opportunities to build transparent products that provide additional insurance, hedging and security for peoples’ investments.

Sheikh pointed out that while there’s rampant criticism that DeFi apps have lost billions, it is worth noting that the losses accumulated by CeFi lenders are notably higher:

“The fact remains that the notable blue chips of DeFi have remained mostly unscathed, yet the losses in CeFi are from industry leaders. However, as crypto CeFi is a stepping stone in people’s journey to DeFi, the industry’s adoption will be steeply hurt in the short term.”

He concluded that the “CeFi contagion” could eventually prove to be a powerful catalyst for the growth of its decentralized counterpart as well as a validation of crypto’s core use case, such as being self-sovereign wealth. 

The future may not be all bad

When asked about what lies ahead for the crypto market, Narek Gevorgyan, CEO at CoinStats, told Cointelegraph that despite the prevailing conditions, the market has already started showing promising signs of recovery, stating that institutional investors are back on the playing field and exchange inflows are on the rise. 

In this regard, banking titan Citigroup recently released a report stating that the market slide is now in recession, with researchers noting that the “acute deleveraging phase” that was recently in play has ended, especially given that a vast majority of large brokers and market makers in within the industry have come forth and disclosed their exposures.

Not only that, the study also shows that stablecoin outflows have been stemmed while outflows from crypto exchange-traded funds (ETF) have also stabilized.

Gevorgyan believes that the trust investors had built up over the last couple of years has been somewhat dissolved due to recent events. Nevertheless, the blockchain community is still better funded than at any point in its short history, with development most likely to continue. He then went on to add:

“The Terra implosion triggered a meltdown that brought several CeDeFi platforms down with it. The community has become more aware of the shortcomings of the CeDeFi model. Overall, the string of insolvencies has provided the crypto market with a chance to start afresh, as DeFi2 and Web3 are continuing to become more significant. Maybe the Metaverse will take center stage in this new configuration.”

CeFi vs DeFi

Sheikh believes that the best of CeFi has lost more than the worst of DeFi, highlighting that Bitcoin (BTC) has continued to remain one of the most liquid assets in the world. In his view, the next wave of retail adopters will have glaring references to the problem of skipping self-custody, thus paving the path for greater focus on decentralized apps, especially as the market continues to mature.

On the other hand, Bashyr sees a lot of protected projects such as insurance protocols and hedged products flourishing from here on out. In her opinion, decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) will become more prominent and functional, providing real governance and allowing users to participate in instrumental decisions by voting on proposals that make a difference.

Recent: Decentralized storage providers power the Web3 economy, but adoption still underway

Lastly, in Xu’s opinion, the insolvencies have resulted in millions of users calling for regulations like those governing traditional finance within the global crypto economy so as to increase transparency on investment of user assets. Xu added that since DeFi benefits from no single point of control while offering full transparency and autonomous rules, it will eventually take over the crypto asset management business.

Therefore, as we head into a future plagued by economic uncertainty, it will be interesting to see how the future of the crypto market plays out. This is because more and more people are continuing to look for ways to preserve their wealth — thanks, in large part, to the recession fears that are looming large on the horizon — and therefore consider crypto to be their way out of the madness.

Solana down 29% in 2025 despite liquidity surge, US crypto stockpile inclusion

CoinGecko open to acquisition but now is ‘too early,’ co-founder says

While CoinMarketCap was acquired by Binance during post-2017 crypto winter, the current bear market is not the right time to sell CoinGecko, its COO said.

Major cryptocurrency tracking website CoinGecko is open to acquisitions, but not right now, according to a co-founder of the platform.

CoinGecko has been hit by the current crypto bear market, but the firm is far from selling off, CoinGecko chief operating officer Bobby Ong told Cointelegraph.

Ong believes that all crypto-related companies are affected by the cyclical nature of the industry as they usually do well during bull runs and struggle during bear markets.

“During this crypto winter, we at CoinGecko are similarly impacted. This will be our third crypto winter and we are focused on improving CoinGecko to prepare for the eventual bull run that will come again,” Ong said.

According to the chief operating officer, CoinGecko had 100 million monthly pageviews in July, experiencing an 85% decrease in traffic compared to the peak in November 2021. The traffic decline comes in line with the price movement of Bitcoin (BTC), which reached an all-time high above $68,000 last November.

“This has definitely impacted revenue, as advertising is one of our major revenue drivers and is a function of pageviews received,” Ong noted. He also said that new token listings on CoinGecko dropped about 70% from last year.

Despite shrinking revenues and the ongoing uncertainty around the crypto market, CoinGecko is still holding strong in terms of its headcount. The firm nearly doubled its staff over the past seven months from 30 to 57 team members and has not laid off any employees. CoinGecko hasn’t instituted any hiring freeze as well, Ong said.

“In fact, we just paid out a small bonus to all team members for the first half of 2022 despite the bear market. We are also in the process of reviewing our salaries to make it more competitive to hire and retain the best talents,” Ong stated, noting that CoinGecko has a few remaining open roles for the rest of the year.

CoinGecko is the biggest rival of CoinMarketCap, the crypto price-tracking website that was bought by Binance in April 2020. The acquisition came during the post-2017 crypto winter, with Bitcoin trading between $7,000-8,000 during the month of acquisition. Binance has never officially announced the cost of the deal, while it was rumored to cost the firm $400 million.

Bitcoin price chart from May 2017 to April 2020. Source: CoinGecko

Following CoinMarketCap’s acquisition, Ong said that the firm was approached multiple times by exchanges, venture capitalists and angel investors, but CoinGecko opted to prioritize independence and stay neutral. The company’s views have somewhat changed since, as CoinGecko considers it might sell the platform one day, Ong said, stating:

“At some point in the future, we will be open to selling the firm but right now, it is too early to sell. The crypto industry is still in its first inning and there will be high growth in the coming years.”

Ong once again predicted that “anything that can be tokenized will be tokenized in the future,” which would require a reliable source to track all those tokens.

Related: ‘Builders rejoice’: Experts on why bear markets are good for Bitcoin

“CoinGecko aims to empower the decentralized future by being the foundational infrastructure to help people get the information they need on the millions of tokens that will be listed in the future,” the chief noted.

He also emphasized that the bear market is the best time to focus on building great products as there is “significantly less noise and distraction from short-term trends.”

Solana down 29% in 2025 despite liquidity surge, US crypto stockpile inclusion

Russia Gears Up to Regulate NFTs Through Legislative Amendments

Russia Gears Up to Regulate NFTs Through Legislative AmendmentsAuthorities in Russia are preparing a number of changes to existing laws in order to adopt rules for the country’s market for non-fungible tokens, or NFTs. A working group has discussed the matter and proposed solutions to legally define and regulate transactions with the digital collectibles. Economy Ministry Takes Initiative to Regulate NFTs in Russia […]

Solana down 29% in 2025 despite liquidity surge, US crypto stockpile inclusion

Latvian Artist Threatened With Prison for Money Laundering Through NFTs

Latvian Artist Threatened With Prison for Money Laundering Through NFTsAn artist from Latvia is under investigation for allegedly selling NFTs, or non-fungible tokens, to launder money, for which he may get up to 12 years in prison. The authorities have blocked his bank accounts and launched an investigation without even notifying him. Artist Who Sold Over 3,500 NFTs Prosecuted for Money Laundering in Latvia […]

Solana down 29% in 2025 despite liquidity surge, US crypto stockpile inclusion

Sentiment and inflation: Factors putting pressure on Bitcoin price

Bitcoin prices are besieged by a multitude of factors, and the cryptocurrency is struggling to breach the $25,000 mark.

Subsequently, there are fears that Bitcoin prices will take longer to recover.

Bitcoin (BTC) has been hovering around the $20,000 range for several weeks now after the coin lost over 60% of its value from its peak in November. The recent plunge wiped out over $600 million from its market cap and caused rising concerns of a bubble burst.

Negative investor sentiment

Cryptocurrency investors have been on edge since Bitcoin’s fall to around $20,000. Many of them fear that more unprecedented selloffs by key players could precipitate a bigger downtrend.

Further declines are likely to amplify losses and make it harder for the market to recover in the medium term. As such, many investors are holding off additional investments.

Besides the fall of cryptocurrencies, the decimation of linchpin crypto firms such as Three Arrows Capital (3AC) and the Celsius Network has also had a negative effect on investor sentiment.

The Singapore-based 3AC hedge fund, for example, collapsed with about $10 billion in investor funds.

The recent crypto crash threw the agency into financial turmoil and made it hard for it to repay its creditors and investors.

The Celsius crypto lending network, which was also revered in crypto circles, also fell on hard times when the crypto market dropped. The company was forced to halt payments to creditors and customers due to low liquidity.

Such incidences have upset investor confidence in the industry and reduced capital inflows needed to buttress cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin.

Margin calls and liquidations

Liquidation occurs when an asset broker forcefully closes an investor’s collateralized position due to a loss affecting the initial margin.

Liquidations usually amplify market slumps by inadvertently increasing the number of selloffs.

On Jan. 11, for example, BTC futures contracts worth approximately $2.7 billion were liquidated within 24 hours, causing prices to retrogress from about $41,000 to sub $32,000 levels.

A similar occurrence happened on June 14 and caused Bitcoin prices to plummet by about 15%. About $532 million worth of Bitcoin was liquidated as a result.

While liquidations influence prices in the short term, they negatively impact asset prices by increasing market turbulence, which causes uncertainty. Uncertainty is bad for the business because it extends fear cycles.

Inflation

Inflation refers to the reduction in relative purchasing power using a nation’s base currency. High inflation usually leads to an increase in commodity and service prices and is typically characterized by unchanging income rates. During the month of May, the United States Consumer Price Index reached 8.3%. For comparison, it was 0.3% in April 2020 when COVID-19 lockdowns started.

Many analysts theorize that the high inflation rate was brought on by the aggressive fiscal policies adopted by the U.S. government in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The government lowered Fed interest rates to zero and unleashed a $5 trillion stimulus program to avert an economic disaster — far more than the $787 billion used to quell the 2008 recession.

The funds used during the pandemic buoyed the economy and helped boost demand for goods and services. However, supply chains were unable to keep up with the growing demand for certain commodities, hence the rise in commodity prices.

Of course, there are other compounding factors, such as the war in Ukraine, which has affected oil prices and led to higher transport costs.

These elements have led to a higher cost of living and reduced investments in speculative instruments such as Bitcoin due to less disposable income.

That said, Bitcoin prices can recover as soon as current socioeconomic dynamics change for the better.

Federal Reserve interest rates

In March, the U.S. Federal Reserve increased the lending rate for the first time since 2020. At the time, Bitcoin prices didn’t move by much because the rate was already factored in. 

However, the announcement prepped investors for upcoming changes and touched off a gradual descent.

On June 15, the Fed raised its lending rate again, this time by three-quarters of a percentage point, which is the highest increase in two decades. The anti-inflation measure caused markets to fall in the subsequent days. The Dow Jones was forced to recede by over 700 points while the S&P 500 fell by 3.4%.

Notably, Bitcoin investors began pulling out of the market a few days after the announcement, causing prices to drop from $30,000 levels to $18,900 between June 7 and June 18.

The reaction was expected because the Fed had already signaled that it would be implementing an interest hike. Fed interest hikes historically reduce investments in speculative assets such as Bitcoin.

Market correction

2021 was a positive year for Bitcoin. The cryptocurrency ended the year with approximately 60% in gains. However, this was an almost 300% increase since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Consequently, a pullback was almost inevitable due to the market overheating.

Market corrections happen frequently and are a natural occurrence in both equity and crypto markets. They are usually caused by economic shocks that prompt investors to take money out of mercurial markets.

Major market corrections usually give way to a bear market, especially when there is a sudden drop of more than 20%.

The current crypto winter is the result of a multitude of factors that include geopolitical tensions and uncertainty amid reports of a possible recession.

The Bitcoin market is likely to recover once these aspects are overcome.

What to expect in the near future

Bitcoin is set to bottom out in the medium term, and this will allow the asset to gain some stability, enough to mollify investors and give rise to bullish sentiment. Speaking to Cointelegraph, Yubo Ruan, founder and CEO of Parallel Finance — a decentralized finance (DeFi) lending and staking protocol — said that the market was in a transitional period, stating:

“I think a healthy market has lows and highs. This current period is a moment of consolidation and will gain momentum as many who have been on the sidelines waiting for a better price begin to buy in. Institutions and major Fortune 500 companies are likely to add some level of crypto to their balance sheets in the coming months.”

Konstantin Boyko-Romanovsky, CEO and founder of noncustodial hosting and staking platform Allnodes, told Cointelegraph:

“Bear markets and bear sentiments allow for a thorough introspection. This is a time to slow down the race for the next best crypto and concentrate on innovation. Blockchains that suffered the greatest during the most recent market plunge may have to take a deeper look at what needs to change in order to remain competitive and beneficial in the future. With that being said, the crypto market and the traditional market will recover. It’s a matter of time.”

Solana down 29% in 2025 despite liquidity surge, US crypto stockpile inclusion

Yuga Labs May Face a Potential Class-Action Lawsuit Over Apecoin and NFT Sales

Yuga Labs May Face a Potential Class-Action Lawsuit Over Apecoin and NFT SalesAccording to the international law firm Scott+Scott’s website, there’s a possibility that the non-fungible token (NFT) company Yuga Labs may be threatened with a class action lawsuit for generally promoting “the growth prospects and change for huge returns on investment to unsuspecting investors.” Law Firm Seeks Investors Who “Suffered Losses” From Yuga Labs Products The […]

Solana down 29% in 2025 despite liquidity surge, US crypto stockpile inclusion

3AC: A $10B hedge fund gone bust with founders on the run

3AC downfall has led to a multi-billion dollar cascade that has claimed the likes of Celsius, Voyager and many other crypto lending firms with exposure to the hedge fund.

Three Arrow Capital (3AC), a Singapore-based crypto hedge fund that at one point managed over $10 billion worth of assets, became one of the many crypto firms that went bankrupt in this bear market

However, the fall of 3AC wasn’t purely a market-driven phenomenon. As more information surfaced, the collapse looked more like a self-inflicted crisis brought upon by an unchecked decision-making process.

To put it concisely, the hedge fund made a series of large directional trades in Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC), Luna Classic (LUNC) and Staked Ether (stETH) and borrowed funds from over 20 large institutions. The May crypto crash led to a series of spiral investment collapse for the hedge fund. The firm went bust and the loan defaults have led to mass contagion in crypto.

The first hints of possible insolvency occurred in June with a cryptic tweet from the co-founder Zhu Su in the wake of the movement of 3AC funds. The crypto market crash led to a severe decline in the prices of top cryptocurrencies including Ether (ETH), which led to a series of liquidations for the hedge fund.

3AC exchanged roughly $500 million worth of Bitcoin (BTC) with the Luna Foundation Guard for the equivalent fiat amount in LUNC just weeks before Terra imploded.

The rumors ramped up after Zhu removed all mention of investments in ETH, Avalanche (AVAX), LUNC, Solana (SOL), Near Protocol (NEAR), Mina (MINA), decentralized finance (DeFi) and nonfungible tokens (NFTs) from his Twitter bio, keeping only a mention of Bitcoin (BTC).

The series of liquidations for 3AC had a catastrophic impact on crypto lenders such as BlockFi, Voyager and Celsius. Many of the crypto lenders had to eventually file for bankruptcy themselves due to exposure to 3AC.

Sam Callahan, a Bitcoin analyst at BTC savings plan provider Swan, told Cointelegraph:

“Using only publicly available information, in my opinion, the failure of 3AC can really be broken down into two things, 1) Poor risk management and 2) Unethical and potentially criminal behavior. The first is a classic example of what happens when you use too much leverage, and the trade turns against you. In this case, 3AC borrowed hundreds of millions of dollars, mostly from cryptocurrency lending platforms, to make arbitrage bets in risky DeFi protocols. One such risky bet was on Terra. Of course.”

He added that 3AC didn’t own up to the mistakes, went ahead to borrow more money and “allegedly even used clients’ funds to make bets to try to make their money back. This was the moment when 3AC morphed into more of a blatant Ponzi scheme. As general market conditions continued to worsen and liquidity dried up, 3AC was exposed as the Ponzi scheme it had become, and the rest is history.”

Looking at the timeline of events in 3AC:

  • May 11–12: Immediately following the Luna collapse, several lenders ask about Luna exposure, 3AC says there is nothing to worry about. 
  • May 18: Co-founder Kyle Davies tries to prevent loans from getting called
  • June 3: Interest rates raised on loans due to market conditions
  • June 7: 3AC team pitches investors on new opportunities to save the company
  • June 10–11: Crypto options broker Deribit margin calls 3AC’s account mobyDck
  • June 13: Davies tries to arrange a new loan from Genesis to pay the margin call
  • June 16–17: 3AC insolvency widely reported

3AC eventually filed for a Chapter 15 bankruptcy on July 1 in a New York court with no known whereabouts of the founders.

Recent: Not just Bitcoin price: Factors affecting BTC miner profitability

Marius Ciubotariu, the co-founder of Hubble Protocol, believes the 3AC lending crisis highlights the resilience of the DeFi ecosystem. He told Cointelegraph:

“The challenges that faced 3AC are not unique to cryptocurrency nor financial markets as a whole. Cryptocurrency is currently the only financial market where market dynamics are allowed to play out. 3AC crisis has revealed how resilient DeFi protocols actually are. For example, Celsius suffered from lending losses and was being margin called. In fear of on-chain automated liquidations that are visible to everyone, they rushed to pay their MakerDAO and Compound loans first.”

3AC owes creditors $3 billion

3AC liquidators have requested a stay of proceedings against the business and access to its Singapore offices in a petition to the High Court of Singapore. The court documents show that 3AC owes about $3 billion to creditors, out of which 3AC’s biggest creditor, trader Genesis Asia Pacific, a subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, loaned $2.36 billion.

Among the long list of creditors, Zhu Su also filed a claim for $5 million. In addition to Zhu’s claim, 3AC investment manager ThreeAC Limited is reportedly making a $25 million claim. Kyle Davies’ wife, Kelli Kali Chen, is reportedly seeking a claimed $65.7 million debt in the same filing in the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court. A court in the British Virgin Islands ordered 3AC into liquidation on June 27.

There is speculation that founders Zhu and Kylie used investors’ funds to make a downpayment on a $50 million yacht purchase. However, other reports have claimed that Zhu tried selling his house in the wake of the 3AC crisis.

A report from blockchain analytic firm Nansen showed that there was an active and trackable contagion in the markets. The stETH depeg was prompted in part because of TerraUSD Classic’s (USTC) implosion. The report claimed that 3AC was a victim of this contagion as it sold its stETH position at the peak of the depeg panic, taking a significant haircut.

Jonathan Zeppettini, international operations lead at decentralized autonomous currency platform Decred.org, believes market conditions played a bare minimum in the 3AC saga and only helped in preventing the fraud further. He told Cointelegraph:

“In reality, they were just participating in other scams such as Terra and acting as a middleman between questionable investments and lenders who thought their record was so impeccable it absolved them from having to do any due diligence. Cascading liquidations caused by the market correcting forced the end of the game. However, in reality, their model was always a ticking time bomb and would have imploded eventually no matter what.”

Michael Guzik, CEO of institutional lending platform CLST, told Cointelegraph that 3AC failed to mitigate market risks and the wave of collapses, and the liquidity crisis underneath it all, is a “reminder of the importance of age-old lending/borrowing practices like leverage and counterparty risk assessment.”

3AC operated in a very opaque way for being the largest crypto hedge fund, and after the collapse set in, it continued to lie to investors about the extent of losses to lenders, movement of funds and its directional market exposure.

Centralization and opaqueness in crypto firms

3AC’s fall highlights the fragility of the centralized decision-making process that can turn into a nightmare during the bear market. The centralization of the decision-making process in 3AC’s operations only came to light after its positions started getting liquidated.

Zhu and Davies, the founders of the tainted hedge fund, revealed that they received a series of death threats after the collapse of 3AC, which forced them to go into hiding. The two founders admitted that the overconfidence born out of a multiyear bull market, where lenders saw their values swell by virtue of financing firms like theirs, led to a series of bad decisions that should have been avoided.

Joshua Peck, founder and chief investment officer at crypto hedge fund Truecode Capital, explained to Cointelegraph that what made 3AC’s failure especially pernicious was its venture capital investing, it often managed the treasury for its portfolio companies, plus it was so well regarded that many other platforms extended them substantial credit, such as Blockchain.com’s $270 million in loans.

Recent: Proof-of-time vs proof-of-stake: How the two algorithms compare

The full extent of its interdependence with other digital asset firms was unclear until 3AC’s positions began liquidating during the cryptocurrency bear market in 2022. It rapidly became apparent that many firms were more exposed to 3AC than was broadly understood. Peck told Cointelegraph:

“Our view is that to avoid total loss in the crypto market, the totality of the cryptocurrency risk profile must be managed. Managers with a background in the engineering disciplines are more qualified to manage cryptocurrency portfolios because the majority of the risks associated with digital assets have more in common with software projects than financial firms. This was certainly true in the case of Three Arrows Capital.”

3AC’s downfall snowballed into a catastrophe that brought down the likes of Celsius, Voyager and a few other crypto lending firms along with them. The extent of the damage caused by 3AC exposure is still unfolding, but it is important to note that the crypto market has managed to get past Terra and the crypto lending fiasco.

Solana down 29% in 2025 despite liquidity surge, US crypto stockpile inclusion

Not just Bitcoin price: Factors affecting BTC miner profitability

As many crypto holders are gearing up for a bear market, what are the factors influencing the mining business?

The ongoing cryptocurrency bear market has triggered a massive decline in Bitcoin (BTC) mining profitability as BTC mining expenses outpace the price of Bitcoin.

Closely tied to the drop in the BTC price, Bitcoin mining profitability has been tanking since late 2021 and reached its lowest multi-month levels in early July 2022.

According to data from crypto tracking website Bitinfocharts, BTC mining profitability tumbled to as low as $0.07 per day per 1 terahash per second (THash/s) on July 1, 2022, touching the lowest level since October 2020.

The decline in BTC mining profitability has caused some big changes in the crypto mining industry.

Lower Bitcoin prices fueled selling pressure as miners were pushed to sell their BTC to continue mining and pay for electricity. The majority of big crypto mining firms like Core Scientific had to sell a significant amount of Bitcoin in order to survive the tough market conditions.

The growing unprofitability of BTC mining has also triggered a big drop in demand for crypto mining devices, causing many miners to sell their mining hardware at a discount.

As lower prices of application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) miners and graphics processing units (GPU) may drive more interest from new miners, it’s crucial to remember that the price of mining hardware is just one out of many factors behind BTC mining profitability.

What is Bitcoin mining profitability and how is it defined?

Bitcoin mining is an economic activity that involves the production of the digital currency Bitcoin using the computing power of GPU-based miners or specifically-designed ASIC miners.

Bitcoin mining profitability is a measure defining the degree to which a Bitcoin miner yields profit based on a wide number of factors, including the price of Bitcoin, the mining difficulty, the cost of energy, the type of mining hardware and others.

Factor 1: Bitcoin price and block rewards

The price of Bitcoin is one of the most evident factors impacting the BTC mining profitability as the value of BTC is directly proportional to profits yielded by miners.

Bear markets trigger even more attention to BTC price from miners because they risk losing money if BTC drops below a certain price level.

Miners should also take into account the amount of the block reward or the amount of BTC given to miners for mining one block on the BTC blockchain. Bitcoin’s original block reward amounted to as much as 50 BTC before it was cut to the current 6.5 BTC following three historical block reward halvings.

Bitcoin halvings are a major part of the BTC protocol, aiming to decrease the quantity of the new coins entering the network by cutting the block reward in half every 210,000 blocks or approximately every four years.

Factor 2: Bitcoin mining hardware characteristics

Bitcoin mining profitability largely depends on the choice of a BTC mining device and related characteristics including hash rate, power consumption and price.

Hash rate is the processing power of a miner, measured in hashes per second (H/S). Higher hash rates include representations in kilohashes per second (KH/S), gigahashes per second (GH/S), terahashes per second (TH/S), exahashes per second (EH/S) and so on.

A miner’s hash rate is the speed at which it can solve crypto mining puzzles to mine Bitcoin. The faster the speed, the more BTC is mined in a specific timeframe. As the BTC hash rate is constantly breaking new highs, Bitcoin miner manufacturers regularly produce new mining devices supporting higher hash rates, while older miners apparently become obsolete over time.

Another important feature of a BTC mining device is the energy consumption. With rising global energy costs, a miner’s ability to consume less energy is essential.

The price of actual mining devices is also an important expense when calculating the BTC mining profitability. Both GPU and ASIC miners got cheaper amid the bear market this year, but brand new flagship miners still cost more than $11,000 at the time of writing.

Factor 3: Mining difficulty and hash rate

Bitcoin mining difficulty is a measure of how hard it is to mine a BTC block, with a higher difficulty requiring additional computing power to verify transactions and mine new coins.

Network difficulty has been rising in 2022, continually breaking new all-time highs. Bitcoin’s mining difficulty adjustment occurs every 2,016 blocks, or about every two weeks, as Bitcoin is programmed to self-adjust in order to maintain a target block time of 10 minutes.

The Bitcoin hash rate is another fundamental metric for assessing the strength of the BTC network, as a higher hashrate means more computing power is required to verify and add transactions to the blockchain. This also makes BTC more secure because it would take more miners as well as more energy and time to take over the network.

Factor 4: Electricity costs

The price of electricity is another important factor when calculating the profitability of BTC mining.

Miners consider electricity prices in various countries in compliance with local crypto mining regulations. As mining activity puts extra stress on a power grid, it’s important to double-check local requirements and specific energy prices for powering BTC miners in this or that country or region.

Bitcoin mining can be powered by many energy sources, both renewable like wind and solar and nonrenewable sources including fossil fuels like coal, oil and natural gas. Amid soaring energy prices caused by recent supply issues, miners should pay special attention to possible implications on BTC mining income when using nonrenewable energy.

Factor 5: Pool fee if not mining solo

Many Bitcoin miners prefer to join mining pools instead of working as individual miners. That is a way to combine their computing power and increase the chances of finding a block and mining BTC faster.

Pool miners should be aware of another small expense that is taken by pool admins that set up the software for this type of mining. The fee is generally 1-3% of the miner’s individual reward, depending on the pool.

Factor 6: Other expenses

Bitcoin mining expenses are not exclusive to ASICs and GPUs and network indicators. BTC mining may also require some additional investment related to the physical mining setup, including facilities and property that are a good fit. Significant expenses may include cooling or noise canceling equipment as some miner machines are associated with a massive amount of heat and noise pollution.

Crypto mining calculators

One of the easiest ways to calculate Bitcoin mining profitability based on all the listed factors is using online BTC mining calculators.

Designed to simplify the process of calculating Bitcoin mining profitability, a BTC mining calculator predicts the approximate mining income based on inputs like BTC price, hash rate, electricity price and others.

Let’s take an example of calculating Bitcoin mining profitability with a brand new Bitmain ASIC Antminer S19 Pro using the BTC mining calculator by crypto market data provider CryptoCompare.

Antminer S19 Pro has a maximum hashrate of 110TH/s and power consumption of 3250W. Let’s assume that a miner’s pool fee is 2% and the miner is based in North Dakota, where the average residential electricity rate in 2022 amounts to roughly $0.11, versus the United States national average price of roughly $0.14.

Related: BTC mining costs reach 10-month lows as miners use more efficient rigs

Given these variables, the daily profit ratio accounts for 27%, with possible BTC mining profits amounting to $70 per month, or $840 per year, according to CryptoCompare. In contrast, given the U.S. national average electricity price of $0.14, the daily profit ratio amounts to 0% or even generates a loss with the current BTC price and other network indicators.

Solana down 29% in 2025 despite liquidity surge, US crypto stockpile inclusion