1. Home
  2. United States

United States

Hong Kong retains top crypto-ready position for two consecutive years

While Hong Kong grabbed the top spot with a crypto readiness score (CRS) of 8.36, the United States fell down a spot to third place after recording a fall of 6.5% in its CRS score — from 7.7 in 2022 to 7.25.

Hong Kong was crowned the best-prepared jurisdiction for widespread cryptocurrency adoption in 2023, retaining its crypto-readiness prowess for the second year in a row. 

A study factoring in the existence and reach of crypto — via ATMs, businesses, accessibility and legality — revealed stiff competition among the 2022 leaders as Hong Kong, the United States and Switzerland held on to the top three positions.

The most crypto-ready place in the world. Source: forexsuggest.com

While Hong Kong grabbed the top spot with a crypto readiness score (CRS) of 8.36, the United States fell down a spot to third place after recording a fall of 6.5% in its CRS score — from 7.7 in 2022 to 7.25 in 2023. On the contrary, Switzerland’s CRS score jumped over 9% — from 7.5 to 8.18 — to rank 2nd worldwide.

As previously explained by Cointelegraph, factors such as crypto ATM installations, pro-crypto regulations, startup culture and a fair tax regime contribute to a country’s CRS. Slovenia, Canada and Australia managed to squeeze into the top 10 in 2023, as shown below.

Five new countries make the top 10 in 2023 including Slovenia, Canada and Australia. Source: forexsuggest.com

When it comes to the masses, the Dutch showed the most interest in crypto per person. The United States is home to the largest network of Bitcoin (BTC) ATMs, however, Hong Kong has the most crypto ATMs per square foot given its significantly smaller land mass.

Estonia, Singapore and Switzerland are among the busiest hubs for crypto and blockchain companies. One of the primary drivers that can make or break mass crypto adoption is taxes. There are 12 countries that impose a 0% tax on crypto for individuals — including Germany, Panama, and Portugal among others — who remain well-positioned to climb up the ranks in the coming years.

Countries with 0% crypto tax. Source: forexsuggest.com

In the US, New York became the most crypto-ready US state after recording CRS of 9.80 owing to numerous crypto-related legislation and a huge number of crypto and blockchain businesses in operation.

Related: US ‘the only country’ crypto startups should avoid, says Ripple CEO

India leads the global crypto adoption in 2023, a recent Chainalysis report revealed. Other lower middle-income (LMI) nations, including Nigeria and Thailand, bagged the second and third spot in the report.

The 2023 global crypto adoption index top 20. Source: Chainalysis

In addition to leading grassroots adoption, India has also become the second-largest crypto market by raw estimated transaction volume globally, ahead of other major economies.

Magazine: Are DAOs overhyped and unworkable? Lessons from the front lines

From Pennies to Properties: The Untold Story of Crypto’s Impact on Homeownership

Bitcoin’s cycles are changing — Bloomberg analyst Jamie Coutts explains how and why

This week’s episode of Market Talks discusses how Bitcoin cycles are changing and how it could impact the upcoming halving.

In the latest episode of Cointelegraph’s Market Talks, host Ray Salmond speaks with Jamie Coutts, a chartered market technician and crypto market analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence. 

When asked whether Bitcoin’s (BTC) pre- and post-halving price action could differ from previous cycles due to a change in global monetary policy, Coutts said: 

“I’ve been writing about this for most of the year. We do have some strong fundamentals in the space, but ultimately, what drives risk assets is liquidity. The longer that we have this tightening cycle, and if we start to see an uptick in unemployment and more stress in the banking sector, then there could be a bit more pain for risk assets like Bitcoin.” 

Related: The future of BTC mining and the Bitcoin halving

Despite the dim macroeconomic outlook, Coutts did suggest: 

“We could be near the end. There is still a lot of underlying stress in the U.S. banking system and other areas of the economy. I think this is somewhat different to any other Bitcoin cycle that we’ve seen, but ultimately, people will need to keep in mind that we are living in a fiat and credit-money-based money system, and inevitably, there will need to be a return to some form of easing because essentially the system cannot handle long periods of deflation. So, it is still Bitcoin, and to some degree, crypto assets that have control of their inflation schedules that will do well when things start to resume.” 

To hear more about Coutt’s views on the macro, Bitcoin, Ethereum, altcoins and stablecoins, tune in to the full episode of Market Talks on the new Cointelegraph Markets & Research YouTube channel. Also, don’t forget to click “Like” and “Subscribe” to keep up-to-date with all our latest content.

From Pennies to Properties: The Untold Story of Crypto’s Impact on Homeownership

Genesis announces winding down of crypto trading services

In January, Genesis Global Capital announced it would eliminate its crypto spot trading services “voluntarily and for business reasons” without additional details.

Crypto lending firm Genesis, a subsidiary of Digital Currency Group (DCG), will stop offering spot and derivatives trading for crypto assets through its British Virgin Islands unit.

According to a Sept. 14 statement from a Genesis spokesperson, the firm will “voluntarily and for business reasons” wind down its digital asset trading services through all of its entities. Genesis had been offering trading services through its GGC International arm in the British Virgin Islands.

The move followed Genesis Global Trading — a firm also affiliated with DCG but not subject to the same bankruptcy proceedings as Genesis Global Capital — announcing in January it would eliminate its crypto spot trading services under similar circumstances — i.e. “voluntarily and for business reasons”. GGC International had still been offering spot and derivatives trading at the time.

Genesis Global Capital halted withdrawals in November 2022, citing “unprecedented market turmoil” at the time. Reports from January suggested the firm could have laid off as much as 30% of its staff before it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in New York. The SEC charged both cryptocurrency exchange Gemini and Genesis for offering unregistered securities through Gemini's Earn program.

Related: Gemini Earn users could recover all funds in new DCG remuneration scheme

The bankruptcy, legal, and regulatory entanglements between the various DCG subsidiaries and crypto firms — DCG is also the parent company of Grayscale Investments — have made waves in the space in the last year. Genesis blamed its collapse on Three Arrows Capital and reported it had suffered losses following the failure of crypto exchange FTX.

In August, DCG announced it had reached an “agreement in principle” with Genesis allowing creditors to recover the majority of their funds. However, Genesis lenders later described the deal as “wholly insufficient” — the firm reportedly owes roughly $3.5 billion to its top 50 creditors.

Magazine: Get your money back: The weird world of crypto litigation

From Pennies to Properties: The Untold Story of Crypto’s Impact on Homeownership

House Financial Services Comm. witnesses air multiple anti-CBDC arguments

The digital assets subcommittee heard from five opponents of a U.S. CBDC without giving supporters equal (or any) time.

A chorus of disapproval rang out from the halls of the United States Congress on Sept. 14 as the House of Representatives Financial Services Committee digital assets subcommittee held a hearing on the “digital dollar dilemma.” Five expert witnesses were scheduled to testify at the hearing, and all of them argued against creating a U.S. central bank digital currency (CBDC), otherwise known as a digital dollar.

The five witnesses slated to speak at the hearing were Digital Asset CEO Yuval Rooz, senior vice president of the advocacy group Bank Policy Institute Paige Paridon, University of Pennsylvania Wharton School's Christina Parajon Skinner, Norbert Michel from the think-tank Cato Institute and Columbia University lecturer Raúl Carrillo. 

The hearing is explicitly dedicated to private sector alternatives to CBDC, but only Rooz was directly affiliated with a business. 

Digital Asset is the creator of the Daml smart contract language and the Canton blockchain, which is backed by companies such as Microsoft, Goldman Sachs and Deloitte. In his prepared testimony, Rooz urges that any form of digital dollar should leverage existing technologies in the private sector.

Paridon spoke about claims made by digital dollar supporters with counterarguments. She concentrated on issues that could arise within the banking system. Based on this list of potential risks, she concluded, “A CBDC could undermine the commercial banking system in the United States and severely constrict the availability of credit to the economy.”

Skinner set CBDC largely in a historical context, beginning with the apparent intentions of the Founding Fathers. She concluded:

“Introducing CBDC is likely to have certain costs to individual economic liberty by providing the State with more tools – and hence greater temptation – to establish command-and-control style public policy.”

The Cato Institute has a well-established record as an opponent of CBDC. Michel addressed technical and political issues and sees no good coming from a U.S. CBDC.

Related: House committee will reopen discussions on digital dollar in Sept. 14 hearing

Carrillo stated his support for a digital dollar and opposition specifically to a CBDC. A major objection put forward by Carrillo to CBDC is the concentration of responsibilities in the Federal Reserve since the Treasury Department has many roles in monetary creation and implementation of financial technology.

In his analysis, Carrillo stated, “There is a profoundly mistaken assumption that we do not already live in a financial surveillance state.” He continued:

“Although counterintuitive to some CBDC critics, substantively reigning in government financial surveillance means limiting public-private partnerships, as direct relationships between the government and members of the public are more likely to engender constitutional protections, including protection under the Fourth Amendment.”

Blockchain technology is not a decisive factor in ensuring privacy, Carrillo argued:

“Aspirationally, blockchain hides sensitive data about users, but in practice, blockchain systems necessarily interface with the surveilled infrastructure of the rest of the internet.”

Carrillo endorsed the Electronic Cash and Secured Hardware (ECASH) Act, which was not one of the bills being examined by the subcommittee but was, Carrillo said, being re-introduced on Sept. 14. Carrillo concluded that “DFC [digital fiat currency] discourse in the United States is comparatively impoverished and unimaginative. […] Policymakers should support an array of Digital Dollar pilot programs and develop a steady rhythm of innovation, aiming to build a safe and secure financial system for all.”

Among the questions that go unanswered in the presentations was that of who precisely the often-mentioned supporters of CBDC are. References were made to CBDC research being conducted by the Fed. Still, in light of the Fed’s well-known mantra of no CBDC without Congressional authorization, that seems like a paper tiger.

H.R. 3402, one of the bills under discussion at the hearing, seeks to make a Congressional mandate for the introduction of a CBDC a legal requirement. H.R. 3712, also under consideration, would largely ban CBDC research. Rep. Tom Emmer’s recently re-introduced "CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act" was also on the hearing agenda.

Presumably, the Biden administration was seen as supportive, as the president’s March 2022 executive order on digital assets mandated CBDC research. The advocacy group Digital Dollar Project, co-founded by former U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission head Christopher Giancarlo, has also contributed significantly to CBDC research.

Magazine: China’s Digital Yuan Is an Economic Cyberweapon, and the US Is Disarming

From Pennies to Properties: The Untold Story of Crypto’s Impact on Homeownership

Bitwave acquires crypto accounting platform Gilded

Bitwave announced the acquisition of Gilded to enhance accounting and enterprise solutions amid improving accounting and tax clarity in the United States.

Crypto winter keeps sparking consolidation among crypto firms. The latest deal in the industry is the acquisition of payments and accounting platform Gilded by one of its competitors, Bitwave. 

According to a statement shared with Cointelegraph, the acquisition is expected to enhance Bitwave's enterprise solutions, including crypto payments and invoicing features, as well as tools for tax tracking and bookkeeping. The integration will also see Ken Gaulter, chief technology officer of Gilded, join Bitwave's engineering team. This deal comes just a few months after Bitwaveacquired Multisig Media.

"We see digital asset payments as faster and cheaper than traditional payment rails — and in this hyper-connected economy, we expect that to be a game changer for businesses,” Pat White, Bitwave co-founder and CEO, told Cointelegraph. The companies did not disclose the acquisition price.

Gilded was founded in 2018 by a group of developers and accountants. It was founded on the premise of helping companies integrate crypto solutions into their financial reporting and accounting processes.

According to Gilded Crunchbase's profile, it has over 130 enterprise customers across crypto startups, nonfungible tokens (NFTs) marketplaces, decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), miners and accounting firms. Gilded's client base will continue to use its existing products while also being introduced to Bitwave's platform.

Bitwave, also founded in 2018, similarly offers crypto accounting and compliance services. The company closed a $15 million Series A in December 2022 to expand its crypto solutions to meet complex accounting requirements for enterprises. Hack VC and Blockchain Capital led the round. In addition, Bitwave recently announced a partnership with big four accounting firm Deloitte to offer enterprise tools, such as connecting blockchain data to ERP systems.

"We believe that crypto payments are the future. With instant settlement and incredibly low fees, financial institutions are starting to recognize the massive opportunity afforded by this technology,” added White.

The deal came shortly after U.S. regulators unveiled new rules for digital assets accounting. On Sept. 6, the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) approved guidelines on how companies can report the fair value of their cryptocurrencies on balance sheets.

"We’ve actually received a surprising amount of clarity on both the tax and accounting side of digital assets," White said about the recent developments. He said that from a tax perspective, "the IRS recently provided a better picture of how staking rewards will be taxed, as well as who meets the definition of a “broker,” and thus, who will be required to send the new 1099-DA forms to customers." With more transparent rules, regulators are expected to monitor digital asset dealings more closely.

Magazine: Crypto regulation — Does SEC Chair Gary Gensler have the final say?

From Pennies to Properties: The Untold Story of Crypto’s Impact on Homeownership

Wyoming stablecoin: Are state digital currencies even possible?

The Stable Token Commission continues researching the potential implementation of stable tokens in Wyoming.

In July, the American state of Wyoming shared an open job position for the head of its Stable Token Commission. 

The executive will work alongside Wyoming’s governor, state auditor, state treasurer and four expert appointees to bring the state’s very own stablecoin to life.

While Wyoming was the first to pass a law on a state stablecoin, it isn’t the only state considering launching its own digital currency.

In April, a similar initiative was proposed in Texas, where lawmakers introduced bills for creating a state-based digital currency backed by gold.

However, the idea of state stablecoins raises many questions: How would they affect the monetary stability of fiat money and the power of the Federal Reserve? Could they be compatible with a central bank digital currency? Do people really want to return to a system with state banks printing their own monetary notes?

The Wyoming experiment

The Wyoming Stable Token Act was originally introduced in February 2022, in the midst of the crypto market crisis. The bill defines the Wyoming stable token as a virtual currency representative of and redeemable for one U.S. dollar held in trust by the state of Wyoming. Basically, the state would tokenize the federal currency on a 1:1 ratio with deposits. 

Explaining why state lawmakers took such an interest in the digital token project, Chris Rothfuss, the minority leader in the Wyoming State Senate, told Cointelegraph:

“Wyoming needs to be able to transact in a digital currency — to accept payments, to make payments, and to do so without risk. The Wyoming stable token is the solution to that challenge.”

A notable reservation in Section 2 of the Stable Token Act makes the state’s attorney general responsible for monitoring the startup phase of the token’s issuance. Should the attorney general believe it contradicts federal or state law, the project would be frozen. 

The bill also sets a deadline for the project: The commission’s director shall provide their report on the doability of the stable token no later than Nov. 1, 2023.

Recent: Privacy prevails and cypherpunks write code at Baltic Honeybadger

Other than that, the document doesn’t specify much; instead, it establishes the Stable Token Commission with the authority to craft further details.

The legislation’s path wasn’t easy. In March 2022, Governor Mark Gordon vetoed the bill, saying he was “unconvinced” that the state’s Treasury was ready to implement the project safely.

Gordon criticized the lack of information and the cost of accounting services, blockchain development and other necessary expenses, and he was skeptical of the project’s purported benefits.

A year later, the governor applauded the effort made by legislators to enhance the document, but voiced new reservations:

“First and foremost, there was no overall plan (a ‘business plan’ for lack of a better term) or, if a plan exists, it did not appear to have been used to guide the legislators in crafting the legislation.” 

On March 22, 2023, the Stable Token Act was passed into law without Governor Gordon’s signature. Gordon recognized the state stable token’s potential to “nurture Wyoming’s reputation as a leader in the digital asset world” and deemed the improvements made by the bill’s authors enough to allow it to become law.

The era of multiple stablecoins?

Neither the U.S. Federal Reserve nor any crypto-focused legislators have reacted publicly to the Wyoming project, but it is hard to imagine any kind of affirmative response, given that the American dollar was established precisely to provide a countrywide monetary standard and bring the currency under the purview of the federal government.

So, in principle, any state token project could contradict the logic of central bank currency to a similar degree as private cryptocurrencies.

At the same time, the potential value of Wyoming’s stable token is rigorously tied to the same old American dollar, which makes it less of a separate currency and more of a state-issued financial asset, similar to the state-issued notes for specie of the 19th century.

A $40 note issued by the State Bank of Georgia in 1855. Source: Southern Style Currency

Rothfuss clarified, “We are not issuing a new currency. The Wyoming stable token is a digital representation of a U.S. dollar held in trust by the state of Wyoming on behalf of the tokenholder. We are not competing with the Federal Reserve — we are enabling a technology.”

Some observers still see a potential conflict between the states and the Fed. “Certainly, there will be a tussle between states and the federal government over the former attempting to issue their own stablecoins,” Brent Xu, CEO of Web3 bond-market platform Umee, told Cointelegraph.

But there could be a compromise in which the Federal Reserve allows states to issue stablecoins under a particular framework, he believes, noting the discussions concerning a national framework for stablecoins.

Zachary Townsend, CEO of Bitcoin-based life insurance provider Meanwhile, doesn’t see any potential problems with state stablecoins, as he believes that the very concept of a stablecoin is open to almost any entity, political or corporate, as the recent example with PayPal’s initiative has shown.

Magazine: Big Questions: What’s with all the crypto deaths? 

He told Cointelegraph, “There are going to be tons of private stablecoins. If I just looked at my life and all the companies I have ‘accounts’ or ‘wallets’ or ‘balances’ with, those are going to transform to become stablecoins within a few years.”

This is something Peter Herzog, state policy lead at the Crypto Council for Innovation, can agree with. “There are a variety of models for stablecoins that involve different decisions around underlying collateral, governance and more,” he explained to Cointelegraph. For Herzog, it comes as no surprise that individual states with an active interest in crypto are continuing their experiments with new initiatives:

“Until we see a federal regulatory framework, it is likely that states continue to step in to create rules of the road to promote innovation and protect consumers.”

From Pennies to Properties: The Untold Story of Crypto’s Impact on Homeownership

US ‘the only country’ crypto startups should avoid, says Ripple CEO

Brad Garlinghouse said Singapore, the U.K., the UAE and Switzerland are jurisdictions with “smart” crypto policies he thinks the U.S. should adopt.

The United States is one of — if not the worst — place to launch a cryptocurrency startup in the world right now, according to Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse whose firm is in a legal battle with the U.S. securities regulator.

“The only country I would not encourage you to start a company right now is in the U.S.,” Garlinghouse said on a Sept. 12 panel at Token 2049 in Singapore.

The Ripple boss wants the U.S. to take note from the likes of Singapore, the United Kingdom, the United Arab Emirates and Switzerland by enacting policies that encourage crypto innovation while protecting consumers.

Bloomberg’s Annabelle Droulers (left) moderating a panel with Garlinghouse (center-left), OKX’s Hong Fang (center-right) and BitGo’s Mike Belshe (right). Source: Andrew Fenton/Cointelegraph

Garlinghouse pointed the blame at the Securities and Exchange Commission claiming its engaging in a political war with the industry with its lawsuits.

That lawsuit strategy isn’t working, said Garlinghouse, and claimed Ripple and Grayscale’s court wins over the SEC may suggest the court’s mood is turning in the industry’s favor.

“I think you're seeing the momentum shift. I think that it used to be that a lot of judges were like: ‘Well the SEC is always right,’ and they weren't fighting that [but] I think you're starting to see the pattern change.”

While the outcomes in Ripple and Grayscale aren’t legally binding, Garlinghouse said the results provide more clarity to crypto exchanges and custody providers operating in the U.S. — at least for now.

OKX president Hong Fang acknowledged the politics at play but stressed for crypto firms to focus on what they can control.

“We can only control what we can control, which is to build the right product and to focus on the technology and to support responsible regulation.”

Despite the U.S. being a big market for Ripple, Garlinghouse said it’s expanding services to countries he claims are more progressive and better understand the potential benefits of blockchain technology.

We might not ready for a spot Bitcoin ETF

During the panel, Fang said he thinks investors may not be ready for custody solutions built around a prospective spot Bitcoin (BTC) exchange-traded fund because much of the new blockchain-based infrastructure hasn’t been battle tested by the masses.

“I think there's a huge implication on custody [...] The question I have on my mind is whether our industry is actually ready for it” he said.

Related: Crypto community jubilant over Grayscale decision, but uncertainty remains

Fang acknowledged a spot Bitcoin ETF will lead to more institutional inflows but isn’t convinced that investors can now stomach Bitcoin’s volatility and second guessed the readiness of continuing to build more applications on top of Bitcoin.

“We are actually creating something that is new, that we can build on top of, a new monetary system that hasn't come to fruition yet,” Fang said. “So I don't know whether we're ready for that yet from an industry infrastructure perspective.”

Magazine: Deposit risk: What do crypto exchanges really do with your money?

From Pennies to Properties: The Untold Story of Crypto’s Impact on Homeownership

Gary Gensler confirms SEC’s use of AI for financial surveillance

The chair’s comments came in response to a query from Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto during a Senate oversight hearing.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler testified on Sept. 12 in a Senate oversight hearing that his agency was currently using artificial intelligence (AI) technologies to monitor the financial sector for signs of fraud and manipulation. 

Gensler gave a public speech before the National Press Club on July 17 wherein he laid out the case for integrating AI technologies into the SEC’s surveillance scheme, but until now, the agency’s explicit use of the tech hadn’t been made public knowledge.

When asked by Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto how he envisioned the SEC using AI, Gensler responded:

“So, we already do. In some market surveillance and enforcement actions. To look for patterns in the market. … It’s one of the reasons why we’ve asked Congress for greater funding this year, in 2024, to help build up our technology budget for the emerging technologies.”

While it shouldn’t come as a surprise to note that the SEC is utilizing AI technologies during the normal course of its operations, it is somewhat surprising that the agency hasn’t issued a formal, public declaration detailing its use.

However, it is worth noting that aside from the requirement to report cybersecurity incidents signed into law by President Biden in March of 2022, there don’t appear to be any legal requirements in the U.S. for agencies to publicly report the internal use of new technologies.

Related: How artificial intelligence can impact supply chains and logistics

Based on the description given by Gensler, it’s unclear exactly what form of AI the agency is using. However, the SEC has filed numerous analysis reports on the use of AI and algorithmic trading by actors within financial markets.

It would make sense for the agency to similarly employ machine learning algorithms capable of parsing large amounts of information for anomalous data.

From Pennies to Properties: The Untold Story of Crypto’s Impact on Homeownership

Binance.US calls SEC’s court requests ‘unreasonable’ in new filing

Binance said the SEC’s requests are “unduly burdensome” soon after the parties agreed on a joint motion to file confidential information under seal.

Binance.US has responded to the motion to compel and reply by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), calling most of the SEC’s requests “unreasonable” and “unduly burdensome.”

Attorneys of BAM Trading Services, which operates Binance.US cryptocurrency exchange, on Sept. 12 filed sealed documents for opposition to the U.S. SEC seeking additional details from Binance.US.

The defendants argued that the SEC’s requests for production and interrogatories are “overly broad, unduly burdensome” and “beyond the scope of the consent order.” BAM attorneys claimed that the SEC’s demand for certainty, as well as the requests for depositions of BAM’s CEO Brian Shroder and chief financial officer Jasmine Lee were “unreasonable.”

BAM attorneys stated that the SEC’s motion “does not identify any evidence” that Shroder and Lee are involved in the day-to-day management details concerning the custody and transfer of customer assets at Binance.US.

“BAM’s CEO and CFO have no unique knowledge regarding facts relevant to the limited topics identified in the consent order’s expedited discovery provision,” the lawyers said. The attorneys also said that BAM has offered many other witnesses, which had more insights about BAM’s operations, including BAM’s chief information security officer Erik Kellogg. The lawyers noted:

“The burden imposed by these depositions far outweighs their potential benefit, and the discovery sought is disproportionate to the needs contemplated by the consent order.”

The attorneys also argued that the SEC still has “no evidence to support its unsubstantiated allegations” implying that customer assets have been somehow diverted. According to the defendants, the SEC’s allegations that form its cross-motion to compel are “misleading and mistaken.”

Related: Binance’s Richard Teng denies FTX comparisons: ‘We welcome the scrutiny’

There is also a “complete disconnect” between the SEC’s “overbroad and abusive approach” and the limited expedited discovery to which the regulator agreed in the consent order, the lawyers said.

BAM’s response came shortly after the SEC and Binance agreed on a protective motion, which requires parties to file confidential information under seal. The plaintiff and the defendants submitted the joint motion on Sept. 11, pledging to file confidential and non-public information as protected materials, restricting access to parties like the judge, attorneys, plaintiffs and defendants.

Magazine: Hodler’s Digest, Sept. 3-9: Binance’s exec exodus, Nasdaq to trade AI orders and SBF loses bail appeal

From Pennies to Properties: The Untold Story of Crypto’s Impact on Homeownership

CFTC Commissioner plans to modernize investor protection with technology

To minimize the damages caused by financial fraud, Romero proposed the formation of the National Financial Fraud Registry — a centralized record of all crimes and fines related to financial fraud.

CFTC Commissioner Christy Goldsmith Romero recommended regulators modernize its protection measures using technological advances as she warned that failure to do so would have a negative impact on American investors.

Romero, speaking at the North American Securities Administrators Association’s annual meeting in San Diego, California, said that the government’s inability to keep pace with technology would affect the most vulnerable investors. She added:

“As regulators are making policy decisions on next-generation technology, it is critical that we have a foundational understanding of the technology, and its implications for finance and law.”

Spearheading this effort to amp up investor protections and guardrails, Romero appointed technology experts in FinTech, responsible artificial intelligence, cryptocurrency, blockchain, and cybersecurity into the CFTC’s Technology Advisory Committee (TAC).

The CFTC Commissioner revealed that the TAC experts are tasked with identifying ways to instill Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-money Laundering (AML) processes into decentralized finance and crypto investment avenues.

The TAC is also tasked with promoting responsible artificial intelligence (AI) development. According to Romero:

“Federal regulators are just getting started when it comes to AI. A good place to start is governance in making important decisions that impact investors and markets.”

Federal crypto investigations have shifted away from primarily backtracking trade activities to monitoring social media platforms such as X (formerly Twitter), Reddit and Facebook. However, Romero recommended the use of tools to aid such investigations:

“Tracing funds, tracing crypto, using the blockchain, using link analysis, using social media, and data analytic tools should all be in a regulators’ tool kit.”

The statements (tweets/posts) one shares on social media platforms “can be strong evidence of intent,” Romero added. The same platforms can be used by regulators to issue warnings about scams and protect investors.

To minimize the damages caused by financial fraud, Romero proposed the formation of the National Financial Fraud Registry — a centralized record of all crimes and fines related to financial fraud. The registry would help investors background check for any ongoing investigations or fines for fraud imposed on the companies. Romero first proposed the creation of this registry in December 2019:

“Once established, each federal agency would register its convictions, sentencings, civil fines and resolved enforcement actions. State and local agencies could join to achieve a true national fraud registry.”

Romero believes that such a one-stop-shop platform could help investors deter financial frauds. On an end note, the CFTC Commissioner stated that together, federal and state officials can improve investors’ safety.

Related: CFTC commissioner calls for crypto regulatory pilot program

In April, Romero urged crypto companies to verify the digital identity of users, as she believed that reducing anonymity in crypto could ease managing the associated risks. She added:

“It is possible for all crypto companies to distance themselves from mixers and anonymity-enhanced technology, while still appropriately providing financial privacy for customers.”

Romero encouraged the verification of digital identity, urging exchanges as well as decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms to verify the digital identity of users.

Magazine: 6 Questions for Kei Oda: From Goldman Sachs to cryptocurrency

From Pennies to Properties: The Untold Story of Crypto’s Impact on Homeownership