1. Home
  2. Sustainability

Sustainability

What are the applications of NFTs in supply chains?

PFP NFTs have seen a lot of adoption over the years. Can NFTs be valuable in real-world scenarios and address pain points with supply chains?

What are the real-world challenges of implementing NFTs at scale across supply chains?

Technology is often only a means to an end and is seldom a silver bullet. There are several real-world issues that can hinder progress with rolling out NFTs and blockchains across supply chains globally.

The benefits of digital twins for real-world goods can’t be underestimated. However, today’s supply chains globally are extremely intermediated and run on trust. A farmer in Africa sells their produce to an intermediary as they have for years. This develops a certain amount of trust between the two parties. 

As a result, resistance to change would be high, even when the farmer realizes that they will accrue value better in a more transparent supply chain. On the other hand, the intermediary wouldn’t want a new system, as their livelihood relies on the margins they make using the farmers’ produce.

Consequently, supply chains are susceptible to resistance from various stakeholders to such implementation. Drug supply chains could become extremely efficient with nonfungible tokens and blockchains. Yet the industry thrives in countries such as India and Nigeria, and corrupt stakeholders across the supply chain would be opposed if a new system is proposed.

Therefore, any technology being introduced into these supply chains will need to have both a top-down approach and a bottom-up approach. The top-down approach will involve governments and regulators mandating better traceability; the bottom-up approach would be firms solving this issue by working on the ground with stakeholders and spreading awareness of the benefits of the technology.

Which companies are using blockchain for supply chain management?

Several luxury and logistics brands use blockchain technology and NFTs to track their products and create digital twins that can help with community-building initiatives.

Major marquee brands in the auto, luxury and retail industries have already started integrating NFTs into their supply chain to obtain the innumerable benefits they offer. 

Walmart utilizes digital twin technology to track the food supply chain ecosystem, increasing trust. Automobile giant Ford uses digital ledger technology to ensure it gets ethical minerals for production. 

The diamond behemoth De Beers also uses blockchain to validate whether diamonds are sourced from war-free zones. Along with this, transportation companies such as FedEx and Maersk use this technology for their operations.

Luxury brands such as DeBeers, Louis Vuitton, Dolce and Gabbana, and Gucci have turned to NFTs for customer integration and loyalty. As nonfungible tokens act as digital twins of real-world goods, they not only offer transparent supply chains but also greater community retention through customer experience.

What are the advantages of using NFTs in the supply chain from a customer perspective?

Customers can see where products come from and the various routes they take before arriving at supermarkets.

Last but not the least, the end-consumer will get access to the evolution of a product. They have transparency on where the raw materials were produced and the companies that were involved in the production. This offers another dimension from a customer experience perspective bringing creators of products closer to the end-user. 

In the FMCG, pharmaceuticals and sectors where expiry and counterfeiting are a major hassle and could potentially lead to catastrophic consequences, NFTs can be a lifesaver. Along with that, the trust factor in brands also increases among customers. Apart from the primary benefits, NFTs can help make supply chains more sustainable, which in turn can help the environmental, social and governance (ESG) narrative of businesses.

As nation-states, central banks and the markets demand more sustainable practices from global businesses, ensuring a transparent and efficient supply chain can help firms with their ESG narrative. Should a company wish to weave sustainable practices into its supply chain, carbon efficiencies achieved through the use of NFTs could be a great value add. For the new age-conscious consumer, this means sustainable products, and for the globe, it means lower emissions. 

What role do NFTs play in the supply chains?

Real-time tracking, settlement and documentation of the supply chain cannot only create more efficiencies for businesses but also help with better financial products that they can rely on for their operating capital.

NFTs create a digital record that is immutable and transparent. What this offers the supply chain industry is a transparent trail where everyone in the ecosystem would have complete visibility. Therefore, right from producing the raw material for goods to displaying them on a website or brick-and-mortar shop, the usage of NFTs will provide traceability and help in supply chain management.

Phygital NFTs have proven to be a great utility when they are tagged to real-world goods. Using NFTs for tracing a good or a manufactured product right to its source can add credibility to the product. It can also offer consumers a method to understand the source of the product they are looking at and choose one based on the providence of the product.

Apart from traceability, NFT-gated procurement and NFT-gated warehousing will help data scientists with valuable insights into product journeys at an individual level. Such granular data will help analysts, business owners and investors assess inefficiencies in the supply chain. This will help set new service level agreements (SLAs) with service providers on the supply chain and monitor them to hit these SLAs.

Furthermore, weaving NFTs and digital twin technology into the supply chain will enable companies to automate payments through the system and perform instant settlement once goods are delivered. Multiple checks and balances before transferring payment for finance teams would be a thing of the past once real-time traceability is enabled. 

Real-time tracking will also help financing products like trade finance, where the status of goods can be used to borrow working capital by stakeholders on the supply chain. Supply chain managers who have an enhanced vantage point can intervene at the right checkpoint in the event of congestion or bottlenecks. This makes supply chains more efficient, resulting in better revenues and lower costs. 

Why should businesses adopt nonfungible tokens in their supply chains?

NFTs can be used in supply chains to make them more transparent and efficient, leading to several billion dollars being saved. This is yet another space where Web3 technologies can have real-world applications.

The supply chain is an integral part of any business. Right from pharmaceutical giants and fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) behemoths to local direct-to-customer brands, most businesses are dependent on efficient and resilient supply chains to deliver their products and services effectively. Despite being a vital cog in the wheel for organizations, supply chain networks are far from efficient on a global scale. 

One of the key applications of blockchain technology has been traceability in a supply chain. This feature of the technology has been experimented with in trade finance use cases by banks such as HSBC. This is a use case that relies more on smart contracts and blockchain infrastructure layers like the Ethereum and Solana blockchains.

While nonfungible tokens (NFTs) as a technology paradigm were not necessarily planned to disrupt supply chains, they can bring about a massive transformation of pain points in this space. NFTs can act as “digital twins” of real-world goods and can help traceability within supply chains.

Here are a few numbers, statistics and narratives to put things into perspective.

  • 49% of businesses have zero knowledge of what’s happening at key touchpoints in their supply chain due to a lack of visibility.
  • Counterfeiting goods cost global brands more than $232 billion in 2018.
  • In industries such as pharmaceuticals, the counterfeit market alone could be close to $200 billion per year.

The scale of the problem can be understood from the numbers above, and NFTs can offer solutions to these inefficiencies. Adding to this, there are also other interesting use cases that lie at the convergence of blockchain and supply chain, which is discussed later in this article. 

Capital Inflows Drive Solana’s Comeback Rally, Glassnode Report Reveals

Davos 2023: Education is key to driving sustainability in blockchain and beyond

Cointelegraph’s editor-in-chief Kristina Lucrezia Cornèr moderated a panel discussion at the 2023 Davos conference in Switzerland on sustainability in the world of blockchain.

The World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland, brings together global leaders and thinkers across various industries to hone in on global issues each year. As the world of crypto and blockchain continues to push into the mainstream view, it, too, has become a topic of discussion at the legacy event. 

Cointelegraph editor-in-chief Kristina Lucrezia Cornèr moderated a panel on Jan. 17, which touched on sustainability efforts in the blockchain industry. 

Even though not all panelists come from the same background, they unanimously highlighted education and learning as the key way to drive sustainability in emerging technologies during "The emergence of Breakthrough Technologies" panel.

The focus of the panel viewed sustainability in the blockchain industry through two lenses. One of which is in the “green” sense of the word - more energy efficient and sustainable for the environment. While the other speaks to the long-term impact of projects and initiatives in the greater Web3 space.

Mark Mueller-Eberstein, the CEO of business consultancy Adgetec Corporation, pointed out that the industry does suffer from “greenwashing,” but verification standards that can be taken from the blockchain can bring out productivity in sustainability practices in the industry.

“Knowing that we can trust the data is extremely important. This is why I think blockchain especially is so important.”

He continued to say that educating the community, especially the next generation, will be “the cornerstone for all of us, as societies and individuals."

Related: From games to piggy banks: Educating the Bitcoin ‘minors’ of the future

Christina Korp, the president of Purpose Entertainment and founder of SPACE for a Better World, pointed out the significance of education in older generations as well with an example of a U.S. congressman over the age of 70 who began educating himself on artificial intelligence.

“How can all these people make the decisions about what happens with the laws, when they don't even understand the technology or this new world?”

The CFO and treasurer of the Hedera Foundation, Betsabe Botaitis, also touched on trust as a foundation for a more sustainable industry, especially she said, as the blockchain industry can sometimes have a bit of a negative reputation.

“We need to be careful with that because it is easy to think that a new idea can be immediately funded. And that’s not always the case.”

Botaitis used carbon credit tracking as an example of a trust-building niche, in which blockchain can be utilized for this transparency and verification.

“It's such an honor to see how companies are coming together to really build this trust infrastructure, an immutable layer.”

Botaitis continued by saying that creating and leaving a sustainable legacy for the next generation is not just about wealth, but having a safe environment for that wealth and education, once again, the key.

“There's very, very little technology that is given for the education of wealth management. I think that it is the private sector that needs to have that education, the regulators and everyone that is having this conversation.”

Education continues to be a major touch point in the Web3 space, with many brands and initiatives focusing on educating users alongside technical developments. 

Capital Inflows Drive Solana’s Comeback Rally, Glassnode Report Reveals

Organizations bring Africa, Costa Rica and Ukraine to the Metaverse to raise awareness

Web3 users will soon be able to experience Africa, Costa Rica and Ukraine in the Metaverse, as organizations recreate virtual environments with a purpose.

The Metaverse is quickly becoming one of the most important places for companies and individuals looking to expand their reach. New findings from research firm MarketsandMarkets predict that the Metaverse market size will grow from $61.8 billion in 2022 to $426.9 billion by 2027. 

In addition, a recent report from Juniper Research links nonfungible token (NFT) growth to metaverse use cases. According to these findings, metaverse-related NFTs will experience an increase from 600,000 transactions in 2022 to 9.8 million by 2027.

Given this potential, a number of regions across the globe have started to establish a virtual presence. For example, the emirate of Dubai announced the launch of the Dubai Metaverse Strategy in July this year. As Cointelegraph previously reported, the Dubai Metaverse Strategy aims to attract companies and projects from abroad while also providing support in metaverse education aimed at developers, content creators and users of digital platforms.

While the concept may sound futuristic, industry experts believe that this is a logical progression. Hrish Lotlikar, co-founder and CEO of Superworld — an augmented reality content platform — told Cointelegraph that as Web3 technology becomes integrated into everyday lives, future-forward regions, governments and organizations will capitalize on communication, gamification and monetization opportunities in the Metaverse.

Organizations bring regions to the Metaverse for a purpose

This appears to be the case, as many organizations are focused on establishing geographical territories within Metaverse ecosystems. For example, Africa can be accessed virtually in Ubuntuland, a Metaverse platform that houses a land called Africarare. 

Mic Mann, co-founder and CEO of Africarare, told Cointelegraph that Africarare connects Africa to the global digital economy:

“Africa is one of the fastest growing populations in the world, and by 2050, it’s predicted that it will be one of the biggest populations. Therefore, we thought this was the perfect time to upskill Africa’s youth for this new world. Africarare aims to create the future of work for Africans and organizations who wish to connect with people across this continent.”

Mann added that Africarare has secured a 12x12 village, or 144 plots, of virtual real estate in Ubuntuland to establish its visibility. He explained that users are defined by digital avatars, which can enter Africarare’s “central hub” land to partake in custom experiences. “These range from art to education and include experiences like galleries, live performances, stand-up comedy, video content channels, film festivals, safaris and more.” 

Image from Africarare. Source: Africarare

Although Mann believes that Africarare will enable a sense of virtual tourism, he pointed out that the project is meant to create improved work and educational opportunities for the African population. “We believe that the Metaverse is the world’s greatest equalizer. Through Africarare, we can allow Africans to partake in this new space and thrive,” he said. 

In order to ensure this, Mann explained that the World Data Lab — a data enterprise based in Austria — recently acquired a 6x6 village in Ubuntuland to develop their presence and connect to other organizations within this part of the Metaverse.

According to Mann, World Data Lab plans to use this collaboration to raise awareness of key-impact topics through virtual initiatives. “This includes developing a data science “metaversity,” to better understand Africa’s growing population.” Mann further commented that companies establishing a digital presence in Ubuntuland will seek to recruit a digital workforce from the platform’s user base.

Mann noted that users in Ubuntuland will use the UBUNTU token as its currency, which is built on the Ethereum blockchain and will be made available later this year. In the meantime, Mann remarked that art galleries across Africarare have already been established and are dedicated to showcasing Africa’s prolific creativity. 

“Over 15,000 users visited the platform during an alpha launch we did in October 2021 with our Mila Gallery,” he said. Based on this success, Mann noted that the Mila gallery, which means “tradition” in Swahili, will continue to host curated collections by some of Africa’s foremost artists. He also shared that Africarar’s Inuka gallery — Swahili for “rise” — will feature works by emerging African artists. “Both galleries will stage various exhibitions on an ongoing basis with art pieces being sold as NFTs,” he said.

While Ubuntuland is focused on Africa’s metaverse, a project known as Alóki will allow users to virtually experience the Central American country of Costa Rica. Bartek Lechowski, chief operating officer of Alóki, told Cointelegraph that the platform reconnects people to nature through blockchain technology. “This play-to-own metaverse will enable users to do good for the planet and help build a sustainable future for society at large,” he said.

To accomplish this, Lechowski explained that Alóki offers its users the chance to virtually explore Costa Rica’s rainforests while participating in sustainable development. This will be accomplished through the project’s blockchain-based game in which digital actions mirror those in the real world via NFT ownership. Lechowski said:

“Alóki aims to make people pay attention to the climate change problem and be interested in contributing to something useful. For example, planting a tree in the Alóki metaverse can result in a real tree being planted in the Alóki Sanctuary of Costa Rica.”

Lechowski — who is also an owner of the Alóki Sanctuary, which is a 750-acre patch of rainforest in Costa Rica — said that thei project aims to plant more than 10,000 trees through its Metaverse initiative. 

Image from Alóki. Source: Alóki

“We currently have a 10-person team of sustainable farmers and are in the process of hiring even more. We’re working hard to create harmonious heaven — we’ve already planted a whopping 11,000 fruit trees,” he added.

In addition to ensuring sustainability, Lechowski remarked that the project aims to create communal buildings that will house coworking spaces and social spaces. “Our online users will eventually be able to come and enjoy Alóki Sanctuary as a reward for their sustainable actions,” he said.

Although Alóki has yet to launch, Lechowski explained that the project will take a simplified metaverse-like model approach that will gradually be developed overtime. “We plan to launch Alóki for our community as soon as there is a common Metaverse standard implemented to work across different platforms,” he remarked. Fortunately, work being done by the Open Metaverse Alliance is currently focused on implementing such standards.

It’s also notable to mention that a nonprofit organization known as The Heritage Hub will soon allow users to experience Ukrainian history within the Metaverse. Brittany Kaiser, co-founder of the Heritage Hub, told Cointelegraph that the organization uses digital scanning, 3D modeling, and NFT tokenization to preserve local heritage to be shared globally in a metaverse museum. She said:

“The problems it solves are three fold: Firstly to have a digital archive of all heritage and cultural sites, artifacts, art and other items of importance to a nation’s history and identity. Secondly, it allows all items to be encrypted on the blockchain for tracking and traceability in case of destruction or disappearance. Lastly, it allows us to use Web3 business models to fund the historic preservation of these sites and items.”

Kaiser explained that the first Metaverse being built is for Ukraine to ensure that anyone in the world will have a chance to experience the important cultural heritage of the country. Taras Gorbul, co-founder of the Heritage Hub, added that people will also be able to contribute to digital tourism revenue that will help the country rebuild after the war:

“Users will be able to visit sites that are still standing, but that are difficult to visit. Eventually, through an avatar, users will also be able visit sites that have been destroyed in the war but have been rebuilt digitally.”

A metaverse with purpose to drive adoption

Although it’s innovative for organizations to recreate various regions in the Metaverse, it remains questionable if users will want to engage with these platforms. For instance, market research firm Ipsos recently conducted a survey for the World Economic Forum that found half of adults across 29 countries are familiar with the Metaverse. While notable, the study also found that excitement for metaverse adoption is significantly higher in emerging countries in comparison to most high-income countries. The report noted: 

“More than two-thirds of people in China, India, Peru, Saudi Arabia and Colombia say they feel positive about engaging with extended reality, compared to fewer than a third in Japan, Great Britain, Belgium, Canada, France and Germany.”

This in mind, Mann believes that education is still needed in order to drive adoption. “Education and access is needed to up skill and empower Africans and the general population about these new technologies and how they can create equal opportunity,” he said. 

Echoing this sentiment, Lotlikar noted that regions like Dubai that are looking to enter the Metaverse also require education that extends beyond the hype of NFTs and blockchain technology. “The vast majority of people need to understand how they can benefit from this technology in the real world,” he remarked.

In addition, Lechowski pointed out that a Metaverse with purpose will be essential moving forward. “Simply redirecting daily activities into the Metaverse is not going to drive massive adoption. We believe that providing custom experiences might do just that.” For instance, even if a Metaverse is only capable of providing an imitation of reality, Lechowski believes that Alóki has the potential to democratize access to nature in the long term.

Kaiser further noted that as more culturally important parts of Ukraine are added to the Heritage Hub’s digital museum, the initiative will be able to roll out tools for more teams wanting to add items to the museum themselves. “In the future, other countries will be able to use the Heritage Hub tech stack to create digital tourism revenue and to open source access to their heritage for education and recreation.”

Capital Inflows Drive Solana’s Comeback Rally, Glassnode Report Reveals

Carbon credit NFTs are only effective if burned, experts say

Environmental concerns plague both the crypto industry and the world at large. However, if used right, blockchain-based assets could offer some relief.

Using nonfungible tokens (NFTs) as carbon credits, or carbon offsets, reveals an outlet for Web3 technology to foster a more environmentally friendly future.

NFTs as carbon credits are a slow-rolling trend in the refinance market and decentralized finance (DeFi). Most of this activity currently takes place on the Polygon (MATIC) blockchain, as it has already offset its entire carbon footprint. However, the way these digital assets work with carbon credits differs from other ventures in the space.

Rather than a store of wealth or a piece of unique digital art, carbon credit NFTs serve as a repository of information related to a specific batch of carbon offsets.

This information could include, but is not limited to, the total number of offsets (i.e., how many metric tonnes), the vintage year of the removal, the project name, geographical location or the certification program utilized.

Such NFTs are then fractionalized into Ethereum-based ERC-20 tokens, fungible with each other.

However, unlike the majority of NFTs available to consumers, a properly functioning carbon credit NFT comes with a catch. In order for it to serve its true purpose, verifying and standing in for carbon emission offsets, it must be burned. In off-chain settings in the carbon market, this is called “retirement.”

A core member of KlimaDAO, a decentralized organization, using DeFi to fight climate change, explained to Cointelegraph how this works both on- and off-chain.

“Retirement means that someone is essentially taking that carbon offset, claiming it for its environmental benefit, meaning that they're basically offsetting their emissions. Then that carbon offset is permanently taken out of circulation and can no longer be traded or sold to anyone else.”

However, when it comes to retiring these carbon offsets in an on-chain setting, one must burn the token once the retirement certificate is obtained. In other words, it must be removed from the database and no longer available for trades.

It's very important that if there is any type of environmental claim being made regarding the offset being embedded in an NFT, that NFT is actually burned in some respect, and a specific entity or individual is named to claim that environmental incident.

There are a large number of projects popping up in the space that claim to implement NFT technology for carbon offsets, including carbonABLE and MintCarbon.

However, with a market value of over $850 billion, the carbon credit industry is not a small one. Like other profitable markets, it is susceptible to scams. As NFTs continue to rise in popularity, NFT scams become more prevalent

Related: Scams in GameFi: How to identify toxic NFT gaming projects

KlimaDAO stressed that projects that claim NFTs as carbon credits should also carry accreditation from internationally recognized standards. Principally, an endorsement from ICROA, or the International Carbon Reduction and Offset Alliance.

If not, projects with this claim should be looked at carefully before investing under that pretext. Although the carbon credit market is valuable, the way it operates is still vunknown to the masses.

“The thing is, you're combining Web3 with a market that isn't very well known. So, unfortunately, you do have various actors that are taking advantage of people.”

Nonetheless, these carbon offset NFTs could be really useful if fully disclosed because they would be doing what they promise. These offsets provide an injection of capital from some other source to maintain and develop a project. This could range from renewable energy generation to forest protection or reforestation.

Capital Inflows Drive Solana’s Comeback Rally, Glassnode Report Reveals

Bitcoin mining to harness onsite natural gas emissions: Ark Invest

A new report reveals an angle for sustainability in Bitcoin mining through harnessing onsite natural gas emissions.

Data from a recent Ark Invest report highlights another utility for Bitcoin (BTC) mining in the realm of sustainability and energy. 

According to the findings, there is enormous potential to transform methane emissions into energy for Bitcoin mining, which, in turn, will turbocharge solar and wind-generated electricity at onsite wells.

Annual gas flaring emissions equal 140 billion cubic meters, along with an additional 125 billion cubic meters in annual methane emissions. Therefore, left untouched, this means 265 billion cubic meters of natural gas emissions are wasted yearly. However, an analysis of the methane needed for the current Bitcoin hashrate stands at only 25 billion.

While harnessing the entirety of the emissions is impossible due to the oil industry’s preexisting flaring operations investments, capturing methane is a viable and early solution. Ark Invest’s Sam Korus tweeted that over half of all vented methane occurs onsite at wells. This makes the location a prime spot for mining to capture such emissions and productively employ them.

Additionally, instead of the methane being vented, it would be able to generate electricity at rates far below what mining companies currently pay.

Recently the mining industry has been showing signs of increased energy efficiency and a pivot towards sustainability.

Last week the Bitcoin Mining Council released its Q2 review of the network. It revealed the industry’s use of sustainable energy is up 6% from the same quarter in the previous years. In conclusion to their findings, the council referred to Bitcoin mining as “one of the most sustainable industries globally.”

However, this has been an active effort to change on the part of the mining industry. Previously, environmentalists shamed the industry due to its unjustifiable carbon footprint.

Korus suggests that while there are other ways to harness methane, Bitcoin mining is an ideal option as “It is highly scalable with modular hardware that can be transported to and shifted among operating well sites.”

While the new data backs up these claims, they are not new. There are already companies actively doing so. Back in February, Cointelegraph spoke with Kristian Csepcsa, the CMO of Slush Pool, on how miners are aiding oil companies with flare reduction by running their generators on natural gas, which would otherwise be burned off.

Nonetheless, there are still skeptics. One Twitter user pointed out that the emissions in question are not naturally occurring. Rather, they are extracted via fossil fuel extraction, which due to climate change, is under pressure to be cut entirely.

As the industry continues to adapt to global sustainability standards, time will tell if such solutions will bring about the future of Bitcoin mining and energy production.

Capital Inflows Drive Solana’s Comeback Rally, Glassnode Report Reveals

MiCA and ToFR: The EU moves to regulate the crypto-asset market

The EU crypto regulation: With the main topics approved, who is affected and what are the possible impacts on the crypto industry?

On the last day of June, the European Union reached an agreement on how to regulate the crypto-asset industry, giving the green light to Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA), the EU's main legislative proposal to oversee the industry in its 27 member countries. A day earlier, on June 29, lawmakers in the member states of the European Parliament had already passed the Transfer of Funds Regulation (ToFR), which imposes compliance standards on crypto assets to crack down on money laundering risks in the sector. 

Given this scenario, today we will further explore these two legislations that, due to their broad scope, can serve as a parameter for the other Financial Action Task Force (FATF) members outside of the 27 countries of the EU. As it’s always good to understand not only the results but also the events that led us to the current moment, let's go back a few years.

The relation between the FATF and the newly enacted EU legislation

The Financial Action Task Force is a global intergovernmental organization. Its members include most major nation-states and the EU. The FATF is not a democratically elected body; it is made up of country-appointed representatives. These representatives work to develop recommendations (guidelines) on how countries should formulate Anti-Money Laundering and other financial watchdog policies. Although these so-called recommendations are non-binding, if a member country refuses to implement them, there can be serious diplomatic and financial consequences.

Along these lines, the FATF released its first guidelines on crypto assets in a document published in 2015, the same year when countries like Brazil started debating the first bills on cryptocurrencies. This first document from 2015, which mirrored the existing policies of the United States regulator the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, was reassessed in 2019, and on October 28, 2021, a new document titled “Updated Guidance for a risk-based approach to virtual assets and VASPs” came out containing the current FATF guidelines on virtual assets.

Related: FATF includes DeFi in guidance for crypto service providers

This is one of the reasons why the EU, the U.S. and other FATF members are working hard to regulate the crypto market, in addition to the already known reasons such as consumer protection, etc.

If we look, for example, at the 29 of 98 jurisdictions whose parliaments have already legislated on the “travel rule,” all have followed the FATF's recommendations to ensure that service providers involving crypto assets verify and report who their customers are to the monetary authorities.

The European digital financial package

MiCA is one of the legislative proposals developed within the framework of the digital finance package launched by the European Commission in 2020. This digital finance package has as its main objective to facilitate the competitiveness and innovation of the financial sector in the European Union, to establish Europe as a global standard setter and to provide consumer protection for digital finance and modern payments.

In this context, two legislative proposals — the DLT Pilot Regime and the Markets in Crypto- Assets proposal — were the first tangible actions undertaken within the framework of the European digital finance package. In September 2020, the proposals were adopted by the European Commission, as was the Transfer of Funds Regulation.

Related: European 'MiCA' regulation on digital assets

Such legislative initiatives were created in line with the Capital Markets Union, a 2014 initiative that aims to establish a single capital market across the EU in an effort to reduce barriers to macroeconomic benefits. It should be noted that each proposal is only a draft bill that, to come into force, needs to be considered by the 27 member countries of the European Parliament and the Council of the EU.

For this reason, on June 29 and June 30, two “interim” agreements on ToFR and MiCA, respectively, were signed by the political negotiation teams of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Such agreements are still provisional, as they need to pass through the EU's Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee, followed by a plenary vote, before they can enter into force.

So, let's take a look at the main provisions agreed to by the political negotiation teams of the European Parliament and the European Council for the crypto market (cryptocurrencies and asset-backed tokens such as stablecoins).

Main “approved” topics of the Transfer of Funds Regulation

On June 29, the political negotiation teams of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union agreed on provisions of the ToFR on the European continent, also known as the “travel rules.” Such rules detailed specific requirements for crypto asset transfers to be observed between providers such as exchanges, unhosted wallets (such as Ledger and Trezor) and self-hosted wallets (such as MetaMask), filling a major gap in the existing European legislative framework on money laundering.

Related: Authorities are looking to close the gap on unhosted wallets

Among what has been approved, following the FATF recommendation line, the main topics are as follows: 1) All crypto asset transfers will have to be linked to a real identity, regardless of value (zero-threshold traceability); 2) service providers involving crypto assets — which the European legislation call Virtual Asset Service Providers, or VASPs — will have to collect information about the issuer and the beneficiary of the transfers they execute; 3) all companies providing crypto-related services in any EU member state will become obliged entities under the existing AML directive; 4) unhosted wallets (i.e., wallets not held in custody by a third party) will be impacted by the rules because VASPs will be required to collect and store information about their customers' transfers; 5) enhanced compliance measures will also apply when EU crypto asset service providers interact with non-EU entities; 6) regarding data protection, travel rules data will be subject to the robust requirements of the European data protection law, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR); 7) the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) will be in charge of defining the technical specifications of how GDPR requirements should be applied to the transmission of travel rules data for cryptographic transfers; 8) intermediary VASPs that perform a transfer on behalf of another VASP will be included in the scope and will be required to collect and transmit the information about the initial originator and the beneficiary along the chain.

Here, it is important to note that European ToFR seems to have fully followed the recommendation enshrined in FATF Recommendation 16. That is, it is not enough for Virtual Asset Service Providers to share customer data with each other. Due diligence must be performed on the other VASPs with which their customers transact, such as checking whether other VASPs perform Know Your Customer checks and have an Anti-Money Laundering/Combating the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) policy, or facilitate transactions with high-risk counterparties.

Related: European ‘MiCA’ regulation on digital assets: Where do we stand?

In addition, this agreement on the ToFR must be approved in parallel by the European Parliament and Council prior to publication in the Official Journal of the EU, and will commence no later than 18 months after it enters into force — without having to wait for the ongoing reform of the AML and counter terrorism directives.

Main “approved” points of the Markets in Crypto-Assets

MiCA is the key legislative proposal regulating the crypto sector in Europe, although it is not the only one within the European digital finance package. It is the first regulatory framework for the crypto-active industry on a global scale, as its approval imposes rules to be followed by all 27 member countries of the bloc.

As already mentioned, negotiators from the EU Council, the Commission and the European Parliament, under the French presidency, reached an agreement on the supervision of the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) proposal during the June 30 political trialogue.

The key points approved in this agreement are as follows:

  • Both the European Securities and Market Authority (ESMA) and the European Bank Authority (EBA) will have intervention powers to prohibit or restrict the provision of Virtual Asset Service Providers, as well as the marketing, distribution or sale of crypto assets, in case of a threat to investor protection, market integrity or financial stability.
  • ESMA will also have a significant coordination role to ensure a consistent approach to the supervision of the largest VASPs with a customer base above 15 million.
  • ESMA will be tasked with developing a methodology and sustainability indicators to measure the impact of crypto assets on the climate, as well as classifying the consensus mechanisms used to issue crypto assets, analyzing their energy use and incentive structures. Here, it is important to note that recently, the European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs decided to exclude from the MiCA (by 32 votes to 24) proposed legal provision that sought to prohibit, in the 27 EU member countries, the use of cryptocurrencies powered by the “proof-of-work” algorithm.
  • Registration of entities based in third countries, operating in the EU without authorization, will be established by ESMA based on information submitted by competent authorities, third country supervisors or identified by ESMA. Competent authorities will have far-reaching powers against listed entities.
  • Virtual Asset Service Providers will be subject to robust Anti-Money Laundering safeguards.
  • EU VASPs will have to be established and have substantive management in the EU, including a resident director and registered office in the member state where they apply for authorization. There will be robust checks on management, persons with qualifying holdings in the VASP or persons with close ties. Authorization should be refused if AML safeguards are not met.
  • Exchanges will have liability for damages or losses caused to their customers due to hacks or operational failures that they should have avoided. As for cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, the brokerage will have to provide a white paper and be liable for any misleading information provided. Here, it is important to know the difference between the types of crypto assets. Both cryptocurrencies and tokens are types of crypto assets, and both are used as a way to store and transact value. The main difference between them is logical: cryptocurrencies represent “embedded” or “native” transfers of value; tokens represent “customizable” or “programmable” transfers of value. A cryptocurrency is a “native” digital asset on a given blockchain that represents a monetary value. You cannot program a cryptocurrency; that is, you cannot change the characteristics of a cryptocurrency, which are determined in its native blockchain. Tokens, on the other hand, are a customizable/programmable digital asset that runs on a second or third generation blockchain that supports more advanced smart contracts such as Ethereum, Tezos, Rostock (RSK) and Solana, among others.
  • VASPs will have to segregate clients' assets and isolate them. This means that crypto assets will not be affected in the event of a brokerage firm's insolvency.
  • VASPs will have to give clear warnings to investors about the risk of volatility and losses, in whole or in part, associated with crypto-actives, as well as comply with insider trading disclosure rules. Insider trading and market manipulation are strictly prohibited.
  • Stablecoins have become subject to an even more restrictive set of rules: 1) Issuers of stablecoins will be required to maintain reserves to cover all claims and provide a permanent right of redemption for holders; 2) the reserves will be fully protected in the event of insolvency, which would have made a difference in cases like Terra.

First introduced in 2020, the MiCA proposal went through several iterations before reaching this point, with some proposed legislative provisions proving more controversial than others, such as NFTs remaining outside the scope but being able to be reclassified by supervisors on a case-by-case basis. That is, nonfungible tokens have been left out of the new rules — although, in the MiCA settlement discussions, it was pointed out that NFTs may be brought into the scope of the MiCA proposal at a later date.

Related: Are NFTs an animal to be regulated? A European approach to decentralization, Part 1

In the same vein, DeFi and crypto lending were left out in this MiCA agreement, but a report with possible new legislative proposals will have to be submitted within 18 months of its entry into force.

As for stablecoins, a ban on them was considered. But, in the end, the understanding remained that banning or fully limiting the use of stablecoins within the EU would not be consistent with the goals set at the EU level to promote innovation in the financial sector.

Final considerations

Shortly after the ToFR and MiCA agreements were reported, some criticized the ToFR, pointing out, for example, that while legislators had done their part, the approved origin and recipient identification measures will only reach central bank digital currencies, but not privacy-focused blockchain networks like Monero and Dash.

Others have argued for the need for a harmonized and comprehensive framework like the MiCA proposal, which brings regulatory clarity and boundaries for industry players to be able to operate their businesses safely across the various EU member countries.

Do you think European policymakers have been able to use this opportunity to build a solid regulatory framework for digital assets that promotes responsible innovation and keeps bad actors at bay? Or do you think that new means of transactions will emerge to impede the traceability of crypto assets with zero threshold? Do you see a need for regulation to prevent the loss of more than $1 trillion in value of the digital asset industry in recent weeks caused by the announced risk of algorithmic stablecoins? Or do you believe that market self-regulation is sufficient?

It is true that market adjustment is shaking up many scammers and fraudsters. But unfortunately, it is also hurting millions of small investors and their families. Regardless of positioning, as an industry, the crypto sector needs to be mindful of accountability to users, who can range from sophisticated investors and technologists to those who know little about complex financial instruments.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

The views, thoughts and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Tatiana Revoredo is a founding member of the Oxford Blockchain Foundation and is a strategist in blockchain at Saïd Business School at the University of Oxford. Additionally, she is an expert in blockchain business applications at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and is the chief strategy officer of The Global Strategy. Tatiana has been invited by the European Parliament to the Intercontinental Blockchain Conference and was invited by the Brazilian parliament to the public hearing on Bill 2303/2015. She is the author of two books: Blockchain: Tudo O Que Você Precisa Saber and Cryptocurrencies in the International Scenario: What Is the Position of Central Banks, Governments and Authorities About Cryptocurrencies?

Capital Inflows Drive Solana’s Comeback Rally, Glassnode Report Reveals

Bitcoin’s real energy use questioned as Ethereum founder criticizes BTC

A founding member of Ethereum has claimed that Bitcoin uses nearly 1% of the world’s electricity, but different sources put it substantially lower.

The ever-raging debate around Bitcoin’s energy consumption has been re-ignited, with founding member of Ethereum Anthony Donofrio claiming that Bitcoin is using “way too much” energy. 

According to figures from Digiconomist, Bitcoin (BTC) currently uses 0.82% of the world’s power while Ethereum (ETH) uses 0.34%. Ethereum researcher Justin Drake posted the figures to his 56,000 followers that Donofrio retweeted, stating:

Ethereum proponents are attempting to take shots at Bitcoin while simultaneously promoting Ethereum’s upcoming transition to proof-of-stake, Drake added another tweet moments later that read: “Ethereum post-merge: 0.000% of world.”

However the validity of the figures are in doubt.

Even Drake was forced to acknowledge alternative sources of data in a later tweet which estimated energy consumption figures at nearly 60% lower.

Data sourced from Digiconomist, which markets itself as a platform that “exposes the unintended consequences of digital trends,” has drawn criticism from blockchain industry professionals in the past. The most notable of which is fellow Ethereum developer Josh Stark who called out the publication for frequently presenting the worst-case scenario when it comes to blockchain technology.

In November last year, Stark published a Twitter thread that questioned the accuracy of Digiconimist’s research methodology. Stark pointed out that almost all of the figures concerning blockchain power consumption were at the “very high end” of any theoretical outcome, especially when compared to more rigorous sources like the University of Cambridge.

Where Digiconomist claims that Bitcoin currently consumes 204 terawatt hours (TWh) worth of electricity per year, the University of Cambridge’s Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index estimates that Bitcoin’s real consumption is much closer to 125 TWh, a 39% difference.

Related: Are we misguided about Bitcoin mining’s environmental impacts? Slush Pool CMO Kristian Csepcsar explains.

While it may be a well-known fact that Bitcoin’s proof-of-work consensus mechanism is an energy-consuming process, the discussion around just how much power the Bitcoin network actually uses remains a hot-button issue.

According to a report from Cointelegraph, putting a specific number on Bitcoin’s actual power consumption can be quite difficult because of the variation in energy sources that power Bitcoin mining globally.

As of January this year nearly 60% of global mining operations were reportedly powered by renewable energy sources, and Bitcoin mining operators are rushing to utilize “stranded” natural gas resources that would normally be burned off. Additionally, a report published by CoinShares in January this year found that Bitcoin mining may account for just 0.08% of the world’s total CO2 emissions in 2021.

Sam Tabar, chief security officer of Bit Digital, a publicly-traded Bitcoin mining company, told Cointelegraph that the environmental impact of Bitcoin is frequently exaggerated by critics:

“The environmental impact of Bitcoin mining is massively exaggerated by critics & traditional financial authorities (IMF, etc.) because they know they can divide a new counterculture movement by using fake environmental arguments. They are trying to gaslight us against each other. They gaslight the world with fake green arguments, and I understand why: They don’t want to lose influence over the levers of power of a system that only works for the elite.”

Capital Inflows Drive Solana’s Comeback Rally, Glassnode Report Reveals

Earth Day: A closer look at crypto projects that make the world a greener place

Here are some of the leading environmentally-conscious projects within the crypto industry and how they are utilizing their technological influence to good effect.

Earth Day, a 52-year-old tradition celebrated annually on April 22, provides an opportune moment for the world’s citizens to reflect upon their environmental progress, as well as rally support for political policy-making, cultural climate awareness and individual commitments to sustainability.

The emergence of blockchain and Web3 has provided the core architecture for a structural remodeling in public transparency, and as such, a technology that has the potential to be harnessed in service of the visions established by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Climate Accord.

Cointelegraph spoke to a number of environmental experts to gauge their opinions and ideas on how Web3 companies can make positive impacts in the global climate endeavor by utilizing the power of blockchain technology.

Sander DiAngelis, the head of growth and partnerships at Toucan Protocol, advocated for an amalgamation of physical and digital initiatives, noting that “tokenized carbon credits” are enabling the creation of “virtual carbon sinks that generate real-world planet-positive impact.”

Coinbase’s philanthropic climate program, which allocates 1% of its corporate revenue towards projects seeking to enhance the democratization of cryptocurrency, recently awarded a $500,000 ecosystem grant to Toucan Protocol to build their carbon markets infrastructure.

Projects such as Pachama and Dovu are utilizing artificial intelligence and hash graph technologies, respectively, to calculate, quantify and report carbon footprint data for the purpose of enhancing accountability and transparency within the corporate and Web3 industries.

In partnership with action groups such as REDD+, Pachama have established a number of restorative ecosystem projects such as the Colombian coastal deforestation-prevention scheme titled Bajo Calima y Bahía Málaga. Nearing the end of its ten-year term, over 1.2 million metric tonnes of carbon have been sequestered from the environment via credit issuance.

Within the crypto space, organizations such as the Climate Chain Coalition and Crypto Climate Accord — both of whom earned the spot of 34th in Cointelegraph’s Top 100 of 2022 list — have made considerable advances in encouraging collaboration, and enacting environmental pledges with the crypto space.

Mitch Liu, the CEO of blockchain video streaming platform Theta Network, shared his belief that the cultural significance placed on the climate change crisis could instigate the creation of cutting-edge decentralized solutions.

He cited ClimateDAO’s work in “pooling its members' resources to buy shares in big, polluting companies to make their activities more sustainable from the inside” as a prime example of this innovation. He continued on to say:

“As NFTs have entered the mainstream conversation over the past year, the environmental backlash has become fierce. There has been a pernicious assumption that all NFTs are bad for the environment."

Liu says that this blanket assessment "completely ignores Proof of Stake blockchains like Theta, which use 0.05% of the energy compared to chains like Bitcoin and Ethereum.”

Christian Hasker, Chief marketing officer of Hedera Hashgraph spoke about “striving for a clean Web3” within the distributed ledger technology (DLT) space, emphasizing the industry's collective obligation to ensure that “We not only have the knowledge and solutions to ensure that the next generation of the internet is sustainable – but crucially, we have a responsibility to do so.”

Prior to pledging Hedera’s continued focus on building green applications with the support of their twenty-six council members, he cited the negative perception of Proof-of-Work consensus mechanisms, even those adopting environmentally-friendly principles, stating:

“It is my firm belief that carbon neutrality at Layer 1 is the only way to deliver on the promise of a sustainable future built on DLT. The greatest way to preserve energy is to not use it in the first place — a sentiment that is shared by mammoth industries and large organizations which are introducing zero carbon goals.”

Capital Inflows Drive Solana’s Comeback Rally, Glassnode Report Reveals

This Earth Day analysts say Bitcoin mining is naturally gravitating to green energy

Earth Day 2022 is a good day to highlight how crypto mining operations have begun to naturally gravitate towards cheaper and cleaner energy sources.

April 22 is Earth Day and with environmental sustainability one of the key topics in the global debate surrounding Bitcoin mining, analysts say the industry has begun to naturally gravitate towards cleaner and cheaper energy sources.

According to a January report by the Bitcoin Mining Council, by Q4 2021, the global Bitcoin mining industry ran on an estimated 58.5% renewable energy.

The preference for clean energy is due to a combination of environmental conscientiousness, political pressures, and an eye on the bottom line. It’s resulting in a sea change that could have ripple effects that extend well beyond Bitcoin (BTC) mining onto power grid systems around the world.

Bitcoin miners in Norway are cleaner than almost anywhere else on the planet thanks to the country’s access to hydropower and other renewables. In fact, 100% of Norway’s electricity is generated from renewable energy.

Of Norway’s 157 Terrawatt hours (TWh) of power produced per year, 88% is from hydroelectric, with wind and thermal force making up the remainder.

Miners use that renewable energy to produce about 1% of the total Bitcoin hashrate according to data from blockchain research firm CoinShares.

Norway contributes about 1% o the total Bitcoin hashrate: CoinShares

Mas Nakachi is Managing Director of Miami-based XBTO Group’s Bitcoin mining operation XBTO. Founded in 2015, XBTO’s mining operation takes in upwards of $25 million per year and claims to be completely powered by renewable energy sources. 

He believes “hydropower is one of the most reliable renewable energy sources available to us.”

Wind power depends on the weather and solar power depends on daylight, but rivers can flow all day every day — and in various locales water can be pumped uphill during off peak periods as a way to store excess energy to run generators when needed. Nakachi told Cointelegraph that:

“Harnessing hydroelectric power has remained an effective mechanism to maintain the most efficient mining possible.”

Whereas a Feb. study published in the Energy Research & Social Science journal concluded “cryptocurrency is unsustainable by design,” Nakachi believes there is a simple path for mining operations to develop both an economically and environmentally sustainable model: 

“Prioritizing some form of clean energy to power the majority of operations is, in the long term, a sustainable model for successful mining operations.”

As reported by Cointelegraph, another option being explored in Texas is the utilization of flexible data centers which can switch from the public grid to temporarily generating its own clean energy from dedicated energy generators to relieve stress on the grid during periods of high retail demand.

Related: Marathon Digital moves Montana BTC mine to pursue carbon neutrality

Tech entrepreneur and self-proclaimed environmentalist Daniel Batten described a multi-pronged way in which the Bitcoin mining industry is creating positive change on the April 22 podcast from Brave New Coin. Batten argued that Bitcoin mining incentivizes building renewable energy plants and helps decarbonize power grids.

Batten believes Bitcoin mining drives increased demand for electricity and therefore investments in renewable energy plants. Mining is suited to intermittent power sources and it can be easily moved to far flung locales to take advantage of excess generation of renewable electricity.

The only problem that Batten sees is that the industry may not be big enough to incentivize all the renewable energy required:

“My only real concern is ‘Is Bitcoin mining requiring enough electricity to help us build up that grid to the extent we need to?’”

Capital Inflows Drive Solana’s Comeback Rally, Glassnode Report Reveals

Polygon commits to going carbon neutral in 2022

The network also pledged $20 million to offsetting their carbon footprint and fostering an industry wide movement.

The Polygon network announced on Tuesday its commitment to going carbon neutral and climate positive this year by releasing their “Green Manifesto: A Smart Contract with Planet Earth.” They also made a $20 million pledge to offset their carbon footprints, and buy extra credits to eventually become carbon negative.

Part of the Ethereum scaling solution's plan for a more sustainable future includes providing resources for ecosystem partners who also want to offset their carbon footprint. Additionally, they hope to facilitate NGOs to make donations that go towards fighting climate change.

According to the company, the Green Manifesto places freedom "at the center of the Web3 ethos" and climate change as the biggest threat to that liberty. Going carbon neutral means that every NFT minted, token bridged or DeFi trade made on Polygon will be accounted for and its environmental impact is offset. Their long term vision is for the ecosystem to become the first blockchain to be what they call climate positive.

Polygon is collaborating with KlimaDAO, an organization of developers that provides on-chain carbon offsetting technology as well as Offsetra that provides Polygon with an analysis tool that gauges the network’s carbon intensity. By analyzing emissions from staking node hardware or bridging activities and the energy consumption from interacting with Ethereum Mainnet, the can better form a management strategy.

Polygon also published an emissions analysis that found that 99% of Polygon’s emissions are due to checkpointing and bridging activities that involve transactions on Ethereum Mainnet. Polygon cited a total network emissions of 90,645 tonnes CO2e from February 2021 – February 2022, under companies like Microsoft and Deloitte.

Polygon recently raised $450 million in a Sequoia-led funding round and other big blockchain venture funds in order to expand its scaling solutions, which includes Polygon PoS, Polygon Edge and Polygon Avail. According to Polygon's co-founder Sandeep Nailwal, these scalability and sustainability initiatives are part of their overall strategy to foster mainstream adoption of Web3 applications.

Capital Inflows Drive Solana’s Comeback Rally, Glassnode Report Reveals