1. Home
  2. US Government

US Government

JPMorgan Chase Warns Massive Tax Hikes May Be Introduced in the US As Debt Explodes to $34,006,270,930,685

JPMorgan Chase Warns Massive Tax Hikes May Be Introduced in the US As Debt Explodes to ,006,270,930,685

The US will extract more money from American taxpayers and businesses as the government’s liabilities become too much to handle, according to a new forecast from JPMorgan Chase. Michael Cembalest, Chairman of Market and Investment Strategy for JPM’s Wealth and Asset Management branch, cites data from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) that suggests all Federal […]

The post JPMorgan Chase Warns Massive Tax Hikes May Be Introduced in the US As Debt Explodes to $34,006,270,930,685 appeared first on The Daily Hodl.

Coinbase faces new lawsuit over alleged investor deception

Why Binance’s US plea deal could be positive for crypto adoption

Is the settlement further indication that the crypto industry’s Wild West era is winding down, with a new epoch marked by regulation and taxation beginning?

Many predicted that Binance would never embrace regulation — it would only pretend to comply in jurisdictions like the United States. 

No more.

Binance pleading guilty to money laundering and other federal charges on Nov. 21 means it’s giving up its free-booting ways. It will also pay a $4.3 billion fine, the largest in the history of the U.S. Treasury Department.

Moreover, Binance’s founder, CEO and principal owner Changpeng “CZ” Zhao — deemed by many the most powerful individual in crypto — will be sidelined from the firm for at least three years after the naming of a court-appointed monitor.

But those may not even be the most important effects.

“The settlement is a lot bigger than that,” Yesha Yadav, Milton R. Underwood chair, professor of law and associate dean at Vanderbilt University Law School, told Cointelegraph, adding:

“It will bring some systematic oversight to Binance by virtue of a monitorship agreement, signaling the end of an era where the exchange has been able to operate in a relatively borderless way, without headquarters and seemingly without a major domestic regulator.”

It will subject Binance to more “scrutiny over its products, risk management, governance, trading partnerships and compliance rigor” than it’s ever experienced before, Yadav continued, and the exchange will probably undergo significant structural reform to put it on a more compliant footing.

The agreement, which Binance reached with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), the Treasury Department and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), should have industry-wide consequences — and not necessarily negative, either.

Recent: Mainstream approval critical for blockchain games — Gaming execs

Indeed, the deal is a “long-term positive” for the cryptocurrency and blockchain industry, according to Austin Campbell, founder and managing partner at Zero Knowledge Consulting and adjunct professor at Columbia University’s School of Business. He told Cointelegraph:

“This is an acknowledgment that crypto is here to stay, and people should have access to it.” 

It is arguably a monumental event for the industry, in part, because stateless Binance is the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange that at times has processed two-thirds of all digital trades, while Zhao, who reached a separate plea deal, is viewed by many as the face of the industry, particularly since the downfall of FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried. 

“We will get you”

“Only the U.S., with its proven and rather unique extraterritorial application of its law, can do this,” Switzerland-based attorney Markus Hammer, principal of consulting firm HammerExecution, told Cointelegraph. “The signal to the crypto world could not have been clearer,” he said, adding:

“If you are addressing U.S. users and actively involved in money laundering and circumventing U.S. sanctions in the crypto business, we will get you. We will get you, including your CEO, and even if you have no registered headquarters.’”

However, Binance may not be totally out of the woods yet with regard to federal U.S. charges. Separately, the SEC brought 13 charges against Binance in June, and those cases have yet to be heard. Moreover, these charges “are much broader than the ones brought collectively by the DOJ, CFTC and Treasury,” Carol Alexander, professor of finance at the University of Sussex, told Cointelegraph.

Binance has evolved into a multifunction organization, observed Alexander, going well beyond its exchange activities. It has a nonfungible token marketplace, for instance, and conducts market-making activities through two firms controlled by Zhao: Merit Peak and Sigma Chain.

The SEC has charged that Binance and Zhao commingled client assets in these market-making firms and used those customer assets as their own, which sounds a lot like what FTX did before its collapse. It will take some time before these latest cases are brought, however, Alexander noted. 

Paving the way for crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs)?

Still, the DOJ plea deal seems to offer some relief for the crypto sector. Some feared the government might try to put Binance out of business and feared global consequences given the firm’s ubiquity. So the settlement eliminated a big “overhang” in the market by this view.

“I see the clarity now provided by the authorities in connection with the deal as very positive for the crypto industry, in general,” said Hammer. “It should also pave the way for a [U.S.] BTC spot-market ETF, which is likely to be launched in January 2024, and perhaps an ETH Spot ETF later in the year.”

Others saw the settlement as another sign the industry is maturing and moving beyond its buccaneering origins.

The Binance of 2018 is very different from the Binance of today, according to Campbell. It’s evolved from what he called “an evasive pirate enterprise” to one that is “well-established in some jurisdictions with actual KYC/AML programs and risk professionals in place.”

“Binance has been committed to getting it right for a while,” Campbell told Cointelegraph, referencing people like Richard Teng — named Zhao’s successor as CEO — and Noah Perlman, chief compliance officer, as examples of its growing seriousness vis-a-vis compliance and regulation. The DOJ settlement “is just one more step on that road.”

Just as the internet’s early pioneers eventually became integrated into the main market and economic system, “so too is crypto coming into the fold,” Truflation founder and CEO Stefan Rust said last week in a statement. “Full regulation and taxation are now here.”

Zhao himself seemed to see the shape of things to come back in 2021, when he stated in a public letter that regulation often trails innovation, particularly with revolutionary technologies like crypto. “The adoption and development of crypto has many parallels with that of the car. When the car was first invented, there weren’t any traffic laws, traffic lights or even safety belts.” Those came later.

Allowing Binance to survive?

Some also read in the DOJ settlement a conscious decision by the U.S. government not to drive Binance out of business. Campbell said:

“One of the biggest negatives for the [crypto] space and for the United States would have been regulators embracing the goal of a crypto ban. This is very much the reverse: the settlement is explicitly about Binance continuing to exist.”

According to Yadav, “a reformed Binance might benefit the crypto industry as a whole by offering a source of private standard-setting and representing a more maturing, careful organization to the world.”

Recent: Bitcoin supercycle 2024: Is this the cycle to end them all?

Maybe that’s going too far. Binance was already growing less dominant in the industry before the plea deal, and that trend could still continue, especially as the SEC case with its broader charges remains outstanding.

Binance could also lose market share over time as risk-seeking consumers gravitate to smaller, offshore exchanges, acknowledged Yadav, while adding:

“But this settlement offers a possible way back for Binance to shed its image as a risk-tolerant firm that has acquired market share by aggressively pursuing customer acquisition at all costs.”

Coinbase faces new lawsuit over alleged investor deception

Vivek Ramaswamy Says US Government Feels Threatened by Bitcoin, Promises To Bring Up BTC at Republican Debate

Vivek Ramaswamy Says US Government Feels Threatened by Bitcoin, Promises To Bring Up BTC at Republican Debate

US presidential hopeful Vivek Ramaswamy says that the government is refusing to fully embrace Bitcoin (BTC) because it sees the top digital asset as a threat to its existence. In a new interview on the What Bitcoin Did podcast, Ramaswamy says Senator Elizabeth Warren’s (D-Mass.) stance on Bitcoin is due to a different worldview. Warren, […]

The post Vivek Ramaswamy Says US Government Feels Threatened by Bitcoin, Promises To Bring Up BTC at Republican Debate appeared first on The Daily Hodl.

Coinbase faces new lawsuit over alleged investor deception

China AI chip market finds expansion paths despite US export restrictions

The U.S. imposed export restrictions of high-level AI chips to China last October, though Chinese companies are now finding new options to develop their technology.

The Chinese artificial intelligence (AI) chip market has been subject to ongoing export restrictions which imposed by the United States from October 2022, which prohibited the sale of certain U.S. products to China. 

The U.S. initially blocked the export of the highest level of chips produced by companies like Nvidia and AMD. Under the initial October controls the companies were still able to export other models to China, such as Nvidia’s A800 and H800.

One year later on Oct. 17, the U.S. government announced an expansion of controls to “reinforce” the previous ones, which meant that all chip models would be embargoed from the Chinese market.

One of Nvidia's top gaming chips, the L40S chip is also affected by the latest export restrictions, which were immediately effective on Oct. 24.

However, on Nov. 9 the local Chinese media outlet STAR Market Daily reported that Nvidia has plans to release three new chips for China. The report cited people familiar with the matter and said the chips are called the HGX H20, L20 PCIe and L2 PCIe.

Nvidia reportedly could make the announcement about the new chips as early as Nov. 16. Cointelegraph has reached out to Nvidia for comment but hasn't yet received a response.

According to a quarterly report from Nvidia earlier this year, China is one of its largest markets, along with Taiwan and the U.S.

Related: Chinese president calls for unity on AI challenges and cyber development

Additionally, Chinese companies have been turning to domestic companies to fulfill their needs for AI chips. 

On Nov. 7, Reuters reported that the Chinese technology company Baidu had ordered AI chips from Huawei in August of this year.

According to the report, Baidu ordered 1,600 of Huawei’s 910B Ascend AI chips for 200 servers. Huawei’s 910B chips are supposed to be an alternative to Nvidia’s A100.

The report said that by October, Huawei delivered more than 60% of Baidu’s chip order, which is roughly 1,000 chips and has a total value of approx. 450 million yuan ($61.83 million). The remaining chips are expected by the end of the year.

Baidu is one of China’s leading AI companies. In October it released its Ernie 4.0 AI system, which it says has an overall performance “on par with ChatGPT.”

Over the summer the Biden Administration reportedly said it is even considering adding restrictions on China’s access to cloud computing services.

Last week, United States Undersecretary of Commerce for Industry and Security Alan Estevez reiterated that fear to reporters at an event in Tokyo, particularly highlighting concerns over usage for military purposes.

Magazine: AI Eye: Get better results being nice to ChatGPT, AI fake child porn debate, Amazon’s AI reviews

Coinbase faces new lawsuit over alleged investor deception

Maine state treasurer to focus on handling abandoned cryptocurrency accounts

According to official data available publicly, the state of Maine currently holds over $328 million in unclaimed property.

A report issued by the Office of the Maine State Treasurer highlighted the U.S. state’s interest in officially managing the abandoned and recovered crypto assets.

The program evaluation report of Maine uncovered the state’s lack of preparedness when it comes to handling cryptocurrencies. It read:

“Our office does not currently handle cryptocurrency, but programs like Unclaimed Property may need to start addressing the situation of abandoned cryptocurrency accounts.”

According to official data, the state of Maine currently holds over $328 million in unclaimed property. The website requires the name, address and property ID information of claimants searching for an unclaimed property.

Form for searching unclaimed property in the U.S. state of Maine. Source: maine.gov 

The report also uncovered the state treasurer’s interest in implementing reforms for emerging issues entailing technology, automated clearing house (ACH) payments and cryptocurrencies. It stated:

“While our current statutes and precedent elsewhere leave us without clear authority to hold our recover crypto assets, we may want to do so in the future.”

The issue around unclaimed cryptocurrencies is a phenomenon well-known across the Ethereum ecosystem as well. 8,893 people participated in an Ether (ETH) presale event in the summer of 2014. However, nearly a decade later, millions of dollars in ETH lie unclaimed in those presale wallets.

Related: Illinois Can Claim ‘Abandoned’ Cryptocurrency Under New Bill

Recently, Maine Wire reported that members of the Maine Democratic Party refused to return a donation of $100,000 they had received from Sam Bankman-Fried. The U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York demanded that political committees return the donations received from FTX after winning seven guilty verdicts in the FTX-SBF case.

Last year, crypto exchange Coinbase launched a tool capable of recovering unsupported ERC-20 tokens that were 'mistakenly sent' to the exchange’s address.

“Our recovery tool is able to move unsupported assets directly from your inbound address to your self-custodial wallet without exposing private keys at any point,” said Coinbase. “We did this by using patent pending technology to send the funds directly from your inbound address without processing the funds through our centralized exchange infrastructure.”

The inability to recover the cryptocurrencies sent to unsupported wallets contributes to the ever-growing pile of unclaimed cryptocurrencies. Coinbase changes this by providing “the Ethereum TXID for the transaction where the asset was lost and the contract address of the lost asset,” which can then be used to recover the lost funds.

Magazine: Exclusive: 2 years after John McAfee’s death, widow Janice is broke and needs answers

Coinbase faces new lawsuit over alleged investor deception

Can blockchain solutions disrupt US inflation forecasting?

New blockchain-based apps like Truflation could be a “healthy development,” given that gauging inflation is more art than science.

So much of the world’s economic steam depends on interest rates, which in turn are tied to inflation, i.e., the rate at which producer and consumer prices are rising. 

But measuring inflation isn’t easy. It is as much art as it is science.

The world’s number one inflation index, arguably, is the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Consumer Price Index (CPI), which has been around for over 100 years.

Not all economists and business leaders are happy with the CPI, however. Its methodology sometimes seems antiquated, and it publishes only once a month. It also relies on a workforce of 477 people who canvas supermarkets, department stores, gas stations and hospitals, often simply jotting down retail prices — not exactly 21st century.

“Basically, they go to stores — whether it’s electronically or in person — and write down prices,” Nationwide insurance chief economist David Berson told Marketplace. “They compare those prices to a month earlier.”

This may be why Truflation.com, a blockchain-based inflation index, is now attracting some attention. It gathers digital data from some 40 “partners” or sources that collectively offer up to around 18 million data points, compared with the CPI’s relatively modest 80,000 data points. Truflation also has a United Kingdom version.

The new inflation index is also updated daily. If rising consumer prices are finally plateauing or beginning to drop, it should be able to pick up changes earlier than the government gauge.

Economist Paul Krugman wrote in a New York Times column in late October: “I’ve been having some fun with a project called Truflation, which supposedly uses the blockchain and was backed in part by crypto types and which I suspect was intended to show that official inflation was greatly understated. What its numbers actually show is a steep decline in inflation over the past year.”

Never mind the dig at “crypto types” — Krugman is a noted crypto skeptic. What’s noteworthy is that this Nobel laureate was taking blockchain-based inflation analytics seriously.

Commenting on Truflation last year, David Harris, chairman of Rockefeller Capital Management, noted: “Their inflation data last fall seemed prescient, as it signaled an upturn before the BLS did. I expect more websites like this which will provide increased ways for investors to assess inflation trends.”

Elsewhere, Base Ecosystem Fund, which invests “in the next generation of on-chain projects building on Base,” Coinbase’s layer-2 blockchain, announced in September that Truflation was among its first six investment recipients out of 800 applications.

Its digital data sources include NielsenIQ, Big Mac Index, Amazon, Walmart, Zillow, Trulia, Penn State University MRI (Marginal Rent Inflation) Index, Real Capital Analytics, Yahoo, Energy Information Administration, OPIS, AAA Gas prices, JD Powers, CarGurus, Numbeo, Statista, CoreLogic, and Kantar, among others.

Cleveland Fed’s Nowcasts

Truflation isn’t the first to venture into real-time inflation prediction. The Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland created a real-time inflation index called “Nowcasts” back in 2014, and today, the bank issues inflation forecasts each month before the official CPI or personal consumption expenditures (PCE) inflation data are released. Its index is updated every morning at 10:00 am.

Inflation Nowcasting for Q4 2023. Source: Cleveland Fed

The idea is to provide consumers, businesses, financial markets and others a sense of where inflation is now and “where it is likely to be in the future.” For example:

“If a consumer is thinking about taking out a loan, it helps to know how quickly wages and prices will be rising during the life of the loan — after all, it will be much easier to service the loan with stronger wage and price growth.” 

The Nowcast model makes use of a small number of available data series “at different frequencies, including daily oil prices, weekly gasoline prices, and monthly CPI and PCE inflation readings,” according to the bank. 

It’s had some success, claiming to be “more accurate than the consensus (average) nowcasts from the Blue Chip Economic Indicators survey” and also “more accurate than the median nowcasts from the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia’s Survey of Professional Forecasters.”

A need for real-time gauges

Real-time inflation indexes like Nowcast and Truflation are long overdue, in the view of many. “There’s an important need for independent measures of inflation that are calculated more frequently than once a month,” Omid Malekan, author and adjunct professor at Columbia University’s Business School, told Cointelegraph. 

Magazine: 6 Questions for Lugui Tillier about Bitcoin, Ordinals, and the future of crypto

“Today, we have millions of prices that we can observe in real-time, and there is absolutely no reason to first publish inflation data with a delay — so we can see them real-time if we want,” said Lars Christensen, an economist and associate professor at the Copenhagen Business School in a recent LinkedIn post.

The view that the BLS’ CPI is antiquated and ripe for disruption “is the main reason we founded Truflation,” the firm’s founder and CEO Stefan Rust told Cointelegraph. The new protocol tracks 18 million items with three price feeds per item, he explained, compared with the government’s 80,000 items gathered “manually,” adding:

“Rather than tracking household expenses via rotating panels, Truflation uses a census-based model to track these.”

There’s no clear “right way” to track inflation, of course, but that’s arguably another reason why new approaches might be welcomed. “There is a lot of discretion in any formulation when answering questions like how much weight to give to different goods or services,” said Malekan, adding:

“The Labor Department claims to be an independent observer, but there is a serious conflict of interest in its formula because billions of dollars in TIPS payments [which protect against inflation] and cost of living adjustments for services like Social Security ride on how we calculate inflation.”

Rust echoed this sentiment that the government’s methodology is not only antiquated but also biased, telling Cointelegraph the methodology that the government set up “is vertically integrated, biased and editable. They can change methodology and time sets on a whim while they are working with old data sets.”

A 97% correlation with the CPI

Overall, the emergence of apps like Truflation is “a very healthy development,” Danielle DiMartino Booth, CEO and chief strategist for QI Research, told Cointelegraph. 

Booth, who worked at the Dallas Fed for a number of years, was among those who “stressed tested” Truflation’s model; the firm supplied her with raw data so QI could conduct a correlation analysis. Since 2012, the index’s correlation with the CPI is 97%, Booth said, which is very high.

As noted, Truflation is accessible on-chain — it’s a node on the Chainlink oracle network that feeds its inflation data into smart contracts across four blockchains: Ethereum, Avalanche, BNB Chain and Fantom. Cointelegraph asked Booth whether it mattered to her that Truflation’s data is on-chain.

“What matters to me is the end product,” she answered. Is it accurate? Does it correlate with the CPI?

Democratizing economic information

Sam Friedman, principal solutions architect at Chainlink Labs, sees things somewhat differently. Truflation’s updated inflation calculation methodology, which is verifiable, refreshed daily and is also accessible on-chain, “represents the world we live in today,” he told Cointelegraph.

The app isn’t just for economic forecasters but also for consumers looking to “understand the impact that inflation has on their lives.” Many are already attracted by the firm’s catchy online dashboard and personalized inflation calculator. Friedman said:

“This type of bottom-up education will drive adoption and is very much in line with the philosophy of decentralized systems. Of course, people who work at large institutions, SMEs [small and medium enterprises], and smaller enterprises are also consumers.”

Software developers, too, will now be able to access real-time inflation data as they design smart contracts for their decentralized applications. “They can reference Truflation with confidence as an independent data provider and help provide end-users with a cryptographic guarantee that the data has not been manipulated,” said Friedman. 

Asked by Cointelegraph if Truflation envisions an audience/market beyond professional economic forecasters and institutional investors, Truflation’s Rust answered, “Yes, 100%.” He pointed out that worldwide, there were perhaps 500 million accredited investors — “but what about the remaining 8.5 billion people on the planet? “How can they get access to inflation-related information and protect themselves against inflation?”

Does Truflation really need a blockchain?

Truflation’s methodology may not absolutely require a blockchain. For some users like Booth, its on-chain availability is largely irrelevant. Still, Rust went to some pains to explain that what separates Truflation’s methodology from others is the fact that it is “transparent, continuously tested, and validated using multiple sources in real time. The blockchain allows us to achieve this.” The technology also provides immutability, censorship resistance, lower costs and “accessibility to all.”

Consider immutability. Governments can sometimes “edit up to six months of historical data and reports,” said Rust. By comparison, “once data is written on the blockchain, it’s logged forever.”

In addition, the project makes use of blockchain-enabled tokenization that significantly reduces costs. Data providers, hosting companies and software and data builders can earn Truflation tokens (TFI), “which represent their ownership and utility in the network.”

This ensures transparency in terms of governance, too, because tokenholders have voting rights in various protocol activities, including data category selection, market strategies and token rewards. This contrasts with government models, “where the government can change the methodology at the whim of an administration,” Rust told Cointelegraph.

Could it supplant the CPI?

Could Truflation’s real-time inflation index — or one like it — replace the CPI someday as the dominant inflation index? 

That’s unlikely, according to Booth.

Professional forecasters like herself will still want a way to compare what is happening today with what happened in the past, and the CPI has been published regularly since the early 1920s.

It isn’t static, either. Its methodology has changed over the years, sometimes in major ways. A more likely outcome would be that Truflation is eventually integrated into the CPI, she opined.

Recent: Help or hindrance: Is Web3 really improving mainstream industry and products?

Moreover, many mainstream economists seem to be just hearing about Truflation, so it may take some time before the app gains real traction. In early September, Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research, wrote in his “Quick Takes” newsletter:

“The headline CPI inflation rate was 3.2% in July. Truflation is tracking that rate at around 2.60% in August, down from July’s 2.73% tracking….”

But when Cointelegraph contacted Yardeni, a well-known Wall Street economist, he declined to comment on the new model: “I’ve just recently started to track them. So I don’t have a strong opinion about them yet,” he said.

“The ultimate test” for Truflation, according to Booth, is whether it can prove useful to practitioners whose careers depend on making accurate inflation forecasts. If it can achieve that, then it might eventually be adopted by government agencies.

Coinbase faces new lawsuit over alleged investor deception

Biden AI executive order ‘certainly challenging’ for open-source AI — industry insiders

The executive order on AI safety from the Biden Administration has laid out its standards for the industry though its vagueness has raised concerns among the AI community over stifling innovation.

Last week the administration of United States President Joe Biden issued a lengthy executive order intended to protect citizens, government agencies and companies through ensuring AI safety standards. 

The order established six new standards for AI safety and security, along with intentions for ethical AI usage within government agencies. Biden said the order aligns with the government’s own principles of “safety, security, trust, openness.”

It includes sweeping mandates such as sharing results of safety tests with officials for companies developing “any foundation model that poses a serious risk to national security, national economic security, or national public health and safety” and “ accelerating the development and use of privacy-preserving techniques.” 

However, the lack of details accompanying such statements has left many in the industry wondering how it could potentially stifle companies from developing top-tier models.

Adam Struck, a founding partner at Struck Capital and AI investor, told Cointelegraph that the order displays a level of “seriousness around the potential of AI to reshape every industry.”

He also pointed out that for developers, anticipating future risks according to the legislation based on assumptions of products that aren’t fully developed yet is tricky.

“This is certainly challenging for companies and developers, particularly in the open-source community, where the executive order was less directive.”

However, he said the administration's intentions to manage the guidelines through chiefs of AI and AI governance boards in specific regulatory agencies means that companies building models within those agencies should have a “tight understanding of regulatory frameworks” from that agency. 

“Companies that continue to value data compliance and privacy and unbiased algorithmic foundations should operate within a paradigm that the government is comfortable with.”

The government has already released over 700 use cases as to how it is using AI internally via its ‘ai.gov’ website. 

Martin Casado, a general partner at the venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, posted on X, formerly Twitter, that he, along with several researchers, academics and founders in AI, has sent a letter to the Biden Administration over its potential for restricting open source AI.

“We believe strongly that open source is the only way to keep software safe and free from monopoly. Please help amplify,” he wrote.

The letter called the executive order “overly broad” in its definition of certain AI model types and expressed fears of smaller companies getting tangled up in the requirements necessary for other, larger companies.

Jeff Amico, the head of operations at Gensyn AI, also posted a similar sentiment, calling it “terrible” for innovation in the U.S.

Related: Adobe, IBM, Nvidia join US President Biden’s efforts to prevent AI misuse

Struck also highlighted this point, saying that while regulatory clarity can be “helpful for companies that are building AI-first products,” it is also important to note that goals of “Big Tech” like OpenAI or Anthropic greatly differ from seed-stage AI startups.

“I would like to see the interests of these earlier stage companies represented in the conversations between the government and the private sector, as it can ensure that the regulatory guidelines aren’t overly favorable to just the largest companies in the world.”

Matthew Putman, the CEO and co-founder of Nanotronics - a global leader in AI-enabled manufacturing, also commented to Cointelegraph that the order signals a need for regulatory frameworks that ensure consumer safety and the ethical development of AI on a broader scale.

“How these regulatory frameworks are implemented now depends on regulators’ interpretations and actions,” he said.

“As we have witnessed with cryptocurrency, heavy-handed constraints have hindered the exploration of potentially revolutionary applications.” 

Putman said that fears about AI’s “apocalyptic” potential are “overblown relative to its prospects for near-term positive impact.” 

He said it’s easier for those not directly involved in building the technology to construct narratives around the hypothetical dangers without really observing the “truly innovative” applications, which he says are taking place outside of public view.

Industries including advanced manufacturing, biotech, and energy are, in Putman’s words, “driving a sustainability revolution” with new autonomous process controls that are significantly improving yields and reducing waste and emissions.

“These innovations would not have been discovered without purposeful exploration of new methods. Simply put, AI is far more likely to benefit us than destroy us.”

While the executive order is still fresh and industry insiders are rushing to analyze its intentions, the United States National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the Department of Commerce have already begun soliciting members for its newly-established Artificial Intelligence (AI) Safety Institute Consortium.

Magazine: ‘AI has killed the industry’: EasyTranslate boss on adapting to change

Coinbase faces new lawsuit over alleged investor deception

UK AI Safety Summit: Musk likens AI to ‘magic genie,’ says no jobs needed in future

The second day of the U.K. AI summit featured a one-on-one talk between Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Elon Musk, who discussed the future of the job market, China and AI as a “magic genie.”

The United Kingdom’s global summit on artificial intelligence safety, the AI Safety Summit, concluded on Nov. 2 with a one-on-one chat between U.K. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and billionaire Elon Musk. 

Musk was one of the many big names to attend the summit, including heads of OpenAI, Meta, Google and its AI division DeepMind, along with leaders from 27 countries. Musk’s nearly hour-long chat with Sunak was one of the main events of the second day.

Their conversation touched on everything from AI risks to China and opened with Elon Musk likening the emerging technology to a “magic genie.”

“It is somewhat of the magic genie problem, where if you have a magic genie that can grant all the wishes, usually those stories don’t end well. Be careful what you wish for.”

Both mentioned these intelligent bots needing a physical “off-switch” and drew parallels to science-fiction movies like The Terminator. “All these movies with the same plot fundamentally all end with the person turning it off,” Sunak said.

Musk commented: 

“It’s both good and bad. One of the challenges in the future will be, how do we find meaning in life if you have a magic genie that can do everything you want?”

This was brought up after governments and AI companies came to an agreement to put new models through official testing before their public release, which Sunak called a “landmark agreement.”

Related: NIST establishes AI Safety Institute Consortium in response to Biden executive order

When asked about AI's impact on the labor market, Musk called it the most “disruptive force in history” and said the technology will be smarter than the smartest human. 

“There will come a point where no job is needed. You can have a job if you want to have a job for personal satisfaction, but the AI will be able to do everything.”

"I don't know if that makes people comfortable or uncomfortable,” Musk concluded.

In addition, Musk commented on China’s inclusion in the summit, saying their presence was “essential.” “If they’re not participants, it’s pointless,” he said. 

"If the United States and the UK and China are aligned on safety, then that's going to be a good thing, because that's where the leadership is generally.”

Over the last year, the U.S. and China have gone head-to-head in the race to develop and deploy the most advanced AI systems.

When Sunak asked Musk what he believes governments should be doing to mitigate risk, Musk responded:

“I generally think that it is good for the government to play a role when public safety is at risk; for the vast majority of software, public safety is not at risk. But when we talk about digital super intelligence, which does pose a risk to the public, then there is a role for the government to play to safeguard the public.”

He said while there are people in “Silicon Valley” who believe it will crush innovation and slow it down, Musk assured that regulations will “be annoying” but having what he called a “referee” will be a good thing. 

“Government to be a referee to make sure there is sportsmanlike conduct and public safety are addressed because at times I think there is too much optimism about technology.”

Since the rapid emergence of AI into the mainstream, governments worldwide have been rushing to find suitable solutions for regulating the technology. 

Magazine: ‘AI has killed the industry’: EasyTranslate boss on adapting to change

Coinbase faces new lawsuit over alleged investor deception

NIST establishes AI Safety Institute Consortium in response to Biden executive order

Documentation from NIST states the consortium will adopt a “broad human-centered focus” with “specific policies.”

The United States National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the Department of Commerce are soliciting members for the newly-established Artificial Intelligence (AI) Safety Institute Consortium. 

In a document published to the Federal Registry on Nov. 2, NIST announced the formation of the new AI consortium along with an official notice expressing the office’s request for applicants with the relevant credentials.

Per the NIST document:

“This notice is the initial step for NIST in collaborating with non-profit organizations, universities, other government agencies, and technology companies to address challenges associated with the development and deployment of AI.”

The purpose of the collaboration is, according to the notice, to create and implement specific policies and measurements to ensure US lawmakers take a human-centered approach to AI safety and governance.

Collaborators will be required to contribute to a laundry list of related functions including the development of measurement and benchmarking tools, policy recommendations, red-teaming efforts, psychoanalysis, and environmental analysis.

These efforts come in response to a recent executive order given by US president Joseph Biden. As Cointelegraph recently reported, the executive order established six new standards for AI safety and security, though none appear to have appear to have been legally enshrined.

Related: UK AI Safety Summit begins with global leaders in attendance, remarks from China and Musk

While many European and Asian states have begun instituting policies governing the development of AI systems, with respect to user and citizen privacy, security, and the potential for unintended consequences, the U.S. has comparatively lagged in this arena.

President Biden’s executive order marks some progress toward the establishment of so-called “specific policies” to govern AI in the US, as does the formation of the Safety Institute Consortium.

However, there still doesn’t appear to be an actual timeline for the implementation of laws governing AI development or deployment in the U.S. beyond legacy policies governing businesses and technology. Many experts feel these current laws are inadequate when applied to the burgeoning AI sector.

Coinbase faces new lawsuit over alleged investor deception

UK AI Safety Summit begins with global leaders in attendance, remarks from China and Musk

The U.K. AI Safety Summit concluded its first day with a common declaration, the U.S. announcing an AI safety institute, China willing to communicate on AI safety and comments from Elon Musk.

The United Kingdom’s global summit on artificial intelligence (AI) safety, “AI Safety Summit” began on Nov. 1 and will carry on through Nov. 2 with government officials and leading AI companies from the world in attendance, including from the United States and China. 

U.K. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is hosting the event, which is taking place nearly 55 miles north of London in Bletchley Park. It comes at the end of a year of rapid advancements in the widespread use and accessibility of AI models following the emergence of OpenAI’s popular AI chatbot ChatGPT.

Who is in attendance?

The AI Safety Summit expects to have around 100 guests in attendance. This includes leaders of many of the world’s prominent AI companies such as Microsoft president Brad Smith, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, Google and DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis, Meta’s AI chief Yann LeCunn and its president of global affairs Nick Clegg and billionaire Elon Musk.

On a governmental level, global leaders from around 27 countries are expected to be in attendance including the U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris, the president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen and the secretary-general of the United Nations Antonio Guterres.

The U.K. also extended the invitation to China, which has been a major competitor to Western governments and companies in AI development. Chinese Vice Minister of Science and Technology, Wu Zhaohui will be attending, along with companies Alibaba and Tencent.

Initial summit proceedings

The two-day summit’s primary aim is to create dialogue and cooperation between its dynamic group of international attendees to shape the future of AI, with a focus on “frontier AI models.” These AI models are defined as highly capable, multipurpose AI models that equal or surpass the capabilities of current models available.

The first day included several roundtable discussions on risks to global safety and integrating frontier AI into society. There was also an “AI for good” discussion on the opportunities presented by AI to transform education.

The 'Bletchley Declaration' and the U.S.’s AI Safety Institute

During the summit, Britain published the "Bletchley Declaration” which serves as an agreement to boost global efforts of cooperation in AI safety. The signatories of said declaration included 28 countries, including the U.S. and China, along with the European Union.

In a separate statement on the declaration, the U.K. government said:

"The Declaration fulfills key summit objectives in establishing shared agreement and responsibility on the risks, opportunities and a forward process for international collaboration on frontier AI safety and research, particularly through greater scientific collaboration.”

Other countries endorsing the statement include Brazil, France, India, Ireland, Japan, Kenya, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria and the United Arab Emirates.

Related: Biden administration issues executive order for new AI safety standards

In addition, the U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo said that it plans to create its own AI Safety Institute, focusing on the risks of frontier models.

Raimondo said she will “certainly” be calling on many in the audience who are “in academia and the industry” to participate in the initiative. She also suggested a formal partnership with the U.K.’s Safety Institute.

Musk calls summit a “referee" 

Elon Musk, the owner of social media platform X and CEO of both SpaceX and Tesla, has been a prominent voice in the AI space. He has already participated in talks with global regulators on the subject. 

At the U.K’s AI Safety Summit on Wednesday, he said the summit wanted to create a “"third-party referee" oversee AI development and warn of any concerns.

According to a Reuters report Musk is quoted saying:

"What we're really aiming for here is to establish a framework for insight so that there's at least a third-party referee, an independent referee, that can observe what leading AI companies are doing and at least sound the alarm if they have concerns.”

He also said before there is “oversight” there must be “insight” inference to global leaders making any mandates. “I think there's a lot of concern among people in the AI field that the government will sort of jump the gun on rules, before knowing what to do," Musk said.

Related: UN launches international effort to tackle AI governance challenges

China says it's ready to bolster communications

Also in attendance was China’s Vice Minister of Science and Technology, Wu Zhaohui who emphasized that everyone has the right to develop and deploy AI.

"We uphold the principles of mutual respect, equality and mutual benefits. Countries regardless of their size and scale have equal rights to develop and use AI," he said.

"We call for global cooperation to share AI knowledge and make AI technologies available to the public on open source terms."

He said that China is “willing to enhance our dialogue and communication in AI safety” with “all sides.” These remarks come as China and many Western countries, particularly the U.S., have been racing to create the most advanced technology on the market. 

The summit will continue for its final day on Nov. 2 with remarks from the U.K. Prime Minister and U.K. Technology Secretary Michelle Donelan.

Magazine: ‘AI has killed the industry’: EasyTranslate boss on adapting to change

Coinbase faces new lawsuit over alleged investor deception