1. Home
  2. Tokens

Tokens

Binance Labs invests in ARKM, the native token of Arkham platform

Binance Labs, the venture capital arm of Binance Exchange, has invested in ARKM, the native token of the crypto intelligence platform Arkham.

Binance Labs, the venture capital arm and incubator arm of Binance, said on Nov. 15 that it has invested in Arkham (ARKM), the native token of the “deanonymizing” blockchain platform Arkham.

The company said in a blog post on the website that the investment aims to support “on-chain insights at scale across the blockchain ecosystem.”

Arkham’s mission is to deanonymize blockchain transactions and strengthen self-regulation by enabling users to see anyone’s blockchain transactions using Arkham’s intelligence platform, Binance Labs said in the post. Based on the proprietary artificial intelligence (AI) engine known as ULTRA — which “algorithmically matches addresses with real-world entities” — the Arkham platform enables users to track entity relationships and flow funds, the announcement noted.

The VC platform also mentioned that Arkham introduced one of the world’s first on-chain intelligence exchanges, the Arkham Intel Exchange. The tool is a “decentralized intelligence economy” that matches buyers and sellers of blockchain intelligence and allows users to generate intelligence to capture value for their work in exchange for the ARKM token.

Related: UK passes bill to enable authorities to seize Bitcoin used for crime

Binance Labs didn’t disclose the terms of the ARKM deal in the announcement. Amid the news, the ARKM token has jumped more than 30% over the past 24 hours, with its market value reaching an all-time high of $100 million on Nov. 15, according to data from CoinGecko.

At the time of writing, ARKM is trading $0.58, up more than 70% over the past 30 days.

Arkham (ARKM) 24-hour chart. Source: CoinGecko

Binance Labs did not immediately respond to Cointelegraph’s request for comment.

Magazine: Beyond crypto: Zero-knowledge proofs show potential from voting to finance

Pro-crypto CFTC boss, subcommittee rumored as Trump inauguration nears

Australia to impose capital gains tax on wrapped cryptocurrency tokens

Delivering a major hit to Australian crypto investors, the ATO stated that wrapping or unwrapping tokens — irrespective of their price at the time — will be subject to capital gains tax.

The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has issued guidance on capital gains tax (CGT) treatment of decentralized finance (DeFi) and wrapping crypto tokens for individuals, clarifying its intent to continue taxing Australians on capital gains when wrapping and unwrapping tokens.

In May 2022, the ATO outlined crypto capital gains as one of four key focus areas. Building on the initiative, the Australian taxman recently clarified a raft of actions considered taxable in its jurisdiction. The transfer of crypto assets to an address that the sender does not control or that already holds a balance will be regarded as a taxable CGT event, the ATO said in its statement.

“The capital proceeds for the CGT event are equal to the market value of the property you receive in return for transferring the crypto asset,” the ATO added. However, the CGT event will trigger depending on whether the individual recorded a capital gain or loss. A similar approach has been considered for taxing liquidity pool users and providers, and DeFi interest and rewards.

In addition, wrapping and unwrapping tokens will also be subject to triggering a CGT event. The ATO stated:

“When you wrap or unwrap a crypto asset, you exchange one crypto asset for another and a CGT event happens.”

The above statement clarifies that wrapping or unwrapping tokens — irrespective of their price at the time — will be subject to capital gains tax.

Chloe White, the managing director of Genesis Block, who is also an advisor to Blockchain Australia, claimed that ATO is in breach of the technology neutrality principle, which ultimately impacts the financial future of young Australians.

Related: Australian regulators will compel businesses to report cyberattacks: Report

Adding to the pressures on Australians, local crypto exchange CoinSpot reportedly got hacked for $2.4 million in a “probable private key compromise” over at least one of its hot wallets.

As previously reported by Cointelegraph, Etherscan shows a transaction totaling 1,262 Ether (ETH) — worth $2.4 million — was moved from from a known CoinSpot wallet to the alleged hacker’s wallet.

The presumed attacker stole 1,262 ETH from a known CoinSpot wallet. Source: ZachXBT

Subsequent investigations found the stolen ETH was being swapped for Bitcoin (BTC) via THORChain and spread out across different wallet addresses.

Magazine: Exclusive: 2 years after John McAfee’s death, widow Janice is broke and needs answers

Pro-crypto CFTC boss, subcommittee rumored as Trump inauguration nears

Indian Supreme court rejects crypto petition, highlights legislative nature

Listening to the plea, the bench headed by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) remarked that the petitioner’s demands are more legislative in nature.

The Indian Supreme Court declined to consider a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that aimed to establish regulations and a framework of guidelines for cryptocurrency trading in India.

According to a report, the bench headed by the Chief Justice of India (CJI), after listening to the plea, remarked that the petitioner’s demands are more legislative in nature. Given the petition’s character, the bench, including Justice JD Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, dismissed the plea. The Supreme Court noted that despite the petitioner filing a PIL requesting regulations and guidelines for cryptocurrency and its trading, the underlying objective is to secure bail.

Significantly, Manu Prashant Wig, the petitioner, is presently held in custody by the Delhi Police in connection to a cryptocurrency case. The Economic Offence Wing (EOW) of the Delhi Police filed a case in 2020, accusing Wig of enticing individuals to invest in crypto with promises of higher returns.

According to the report, Wig served as one of the directors at Blue Fox Motion Picture Limited, enticing individuals to invest. Subsequently, victims reported the fraud to the Economic Offence Wing (EOW) in Delhi. A total of 133 investors or victims who had invested their funds, filed a case stating Wig deceived them.

Seeking relief from judicial custody, the petitioner, Manu Prashant, filed a PIL demanding regulations and a framework for crypto trading in India. Despite the Supreme Court rejecting the PIL, the bench permitted the petitioner, currently in jail, to pursue legal remedies and approach other relevant authorities.

Related: India trained 3,000 police officials on crypto investigations in 2022–2023

During the court hearing, the bench led by CJI Chandrachud advised the petitioner to approach a different court for bail. Expressing reservations about the plea for crypto trading regulations, the court noted that such demands fall within the legislative domain. The court highlighted its inability to issue directives under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution.

The status of crypto trading in India remains debatable due to the absence of standardized rules, guidelines, or specific frameworks for handling cryptocurrencies. India is reportedly developing a cryptocurrency regulatory framework, drawing from joint recommendations by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Financial Stability Board (FSB). The outcome could manifest as legal legislation within the next five to six months, as per Cointelegraph’s recent coverage.

Magazine: Exclusive: 2 years after John McAfee’s death, widow Janice is broke and needs answers

Pro-crypto CFTC boss, subcommittee rumored as Trump inauguration nears

UK cryptocurrency scams jump 23%, young investors prime targets: Lloyds Bank

According to the bank, potential cryptocurrency investors usually make an average of three payments before recognizing they’ve fallen victim to a scam.

One of the Big Four banks in the United Kingdom, Lloyds Bank, has said that reports of cryptocurrency investment scams by victims have surged by 23% in the current year compared to the same period in 2022.

According to a press release published by Lloyds Bank, an increasing number of investors face the threat of falling victim to fraudulent schemes through a wave of fake advertisements posted on social media. Each victim of a cryptocurrency investment scam is losing an average of $13,115 (10,741 British pounds), an increase from $8,562 (7,010 pounds) the previous year. This surpasses losses from other consumer frauds, such as romance scams or purchase scams.

Screenshot of the report from Lloyds Bank. Source: Lloyds Bank

According to the report, individuals aged 25–34 constitute a quarter of all crypto scam victims, making it the most prevalent age group affected. The criminal organizations orchestrating these scams adapt their strategies to capitalize on emerging trends, deceiving more victims into relinquishing their money. Recently, their focus has expanded to include younger investors, enticed by the allure of quick riches through cryptocurrency trading.

Potential cryptocurrency investors usually make an average of three payments before recognizing they’ve fallen victim to a scam. It takes approximately 100 days from the initial transaction date before they report it to their bank. Unfortunately, the funds are usually irretrievable for the bank by this time.

Related: BNB Smart Chain scam losses dropped 75% in Q3: Report

This Lloyds Bank report corresponds with findings from a Coinbase report on the cryptocurrency landscape, indicating that younger Americans are more receptive to unconventional avenues for financial independence, including crypto, than older generations. This susceptibility makes them vulnerable to scams.

Younger generations actively explore new economic opportunities, laying the foundation for a modernized system and a revitalized version of the “American Dream.” As the report outlines, they see technologies like cryptocurrency as a tool to modernize the system.

Magazine: Eleanor Terrett on impersonators and a better crypto industry: Hall of Flame

Pro-crypto CFTC boss, subcommittee rumored as Trump inauguration nears

Is it altseason? Altcoin 30-day performance and total market cap flash bullish

3 key data points highlight the 60-day strength shown by altcoins.

A wave of green has washed across the entire crypto market, and it won’t be long before traders on X (the social platform formerly known as Twitter) begin to explain that a new altcoins season has arrived. 

Altcoin season, or ‘altseason’ as the crypto bros say, typically measures the rallying of altcoins and a positive market capitalization increase of the total altcoin market cap.

Let’s take a look at some key indicators that market participants use to determine whether or not an altcoin season has emerged.

Total crypto market capitalization hits a 14-month high

The total crypto market cap recently hit a 14-month high, clearly reflecting the current bullish momentum.

Similar strength is seen in the total altcoin market capitalization chart (TOTAL2). The metric measures the crypto market cap minus Bitcoin (BTC).

Since Sept. 8, the metric has springboarded from $526 billion to $622 billion on Nov. 9. The change shows traders’ growing interest and investment interest in altcoins, along with an increase in the prices of altcoins within the metric.

Total crypto market cap minus Bitcoin. Source: TradingView

Related: Exclusive: 2 years after John McAfee’s death, widow Janice is broke and needs answers

Large-cap altcoins display multi-week strength

Data from CoinMarketCap shows the top 13 altcoins by market cap (excluding stablecoins) reflecting double-digit gains within the last 30 to 60-days.

In particular, Ripple (XRP), which has won a host of legal battles against the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), witnessed 45% gains in the past 60-days. On top of the legal victories that helped to boost investor sentiment, it is rumored that Ripple will be announcing an IPO on Nov. 9.

Top altcoin performers. Source: CoinMarketCap

For the past 3-months, Solana (SOL) has rallied significantly and started to lose its “Sam coin” moniker. Sam coins are cryptocurrencies with exposure to Alameda Research, FTX and Bankman-Fried. SOL price gained over 107% in the past 60-days as the project continues to rebuild and gain users in the aftermath of the FTX collapse. BitMEX exchange co-founder Arthur Hayes recently joined the Solana train, announcing that he purchased the altcoin on Nov. 2.

Similar to Solana, Chainlink (LINK) has seen massive 60-day returns of over 100% due to consistent building and usage. Link also has posted 26% returns in 6-days.

Related: New BTC price levels to watch as Bitcoin avoids $36K

Other notable performances came from BNB (BNB), Cardano (ADA), Tron (TRX) and Polygon (MATIC), which also produced double-digit gains in a 60-day period.

The altcoin market performance seemingly coincides with an improvement in investor sentiment. A gauge of market sentiment is the Fear & Greed Index. Since starting September as fearful, the market has turned to greed on Oct. 23 and has not reversed.

Fear & Greed Index. Source: Newhedge

Whether it is truly altseason or not, it is clear that excitement is returning to the crypto market.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Pro-crypto CFTC boss, subcommittee rumored as Trump inauguration nears

Pay and dump? How businesses accepting crypto payments influence adoption

Crypto payments are often seen as a way to boost adoption, but is adoption growing if the business sells crypto right back? The answer is complex.

Cryptocurrency enthusiasts often argue that businesses need to start accepting crypto as payments for adoption to grow — boosting usability and potentially creating strong demand for these currencies.

Some crypto communities often focus heavily on growing business adoption, with maps now compiling businesses worldwide that accept different cryptocurrencies as a payment method.

But if a business accepts cryptocurrency payments only to dump them on the market, it may undermine the entire effort, as the assets are just being sold back on the market right after payment.

Moreover, a business accepting cryptocurrency payments through a third-party processor isn’t adhering to the cryptocurrency ethos of managing their own private keys, meaning controlling their wallet fully.

On the flip side, proponents argue that the mere act of enabling cryptocurrency payments opens up new avenues for consumers to transact in crypto, bringing in a new, long-awaited use case.

Do businesses accepting crypto boost adoption?

On its surface, a business accepting cryptocurrency payments would boost adoption. Still, if the digital currency received is immediately sold back on the market, it’s generating as much demand as it is supply. This simultaneous buy-sell cycle may not significantly contribute to cryptocurrency adoption.

Additionally, it isn’t clear how relevant a business accepting cryptocurrency payments can be for actual adoption, as users are unlikely to go through the process of buying cryptocurrencies if they can just pay in their local fiat currency.

The essence of adoption doesn’t merely reside in the act of acceptance by businesses; it fundamentally lies in the ease of access and willingness of consumers to transition to cryptocurrencies for their transactional needs.

A study by leading research and advisory firm Forrester Consulting revealed that merchants accepting Bitcoin (BTC) attracted new customers and sales.

The study found that cryptocurrency payments bring in up to 40% of new customers for merchants, with crypto customers spending twice as much as those using credit cards.

Speaking to Cointelegraph, BitPay chief marketing officer William Zielke referenced the Forrester Consulting study and said cryptocurrency payment processors give cryptocurrency spenders a fast, easy way to pay for large ticket items and everyday purchases.

Zielke said that during the first half of this year, BitPay saw a 10% uptick in new customer sign-ups compared to the previous year despite the volatile cryptocurrency market. He added that while some brands may already have a technically savvy user base when they start accepting crypto, other merchants may end up introducing new users to crypto:

“Alternatively, merchants like AMC Theatres connect with a broad base of customers who may need to be better-versed in the crypto world. Partnering with big brands like AMC Theatres is an excellent way to boost consumer adoption since it introduces crypto payments for everyday purchases.”

Sankar Krishnan, head of digital assets and fintech at consulting firm Capgemini, told Cointelegraph that money serves “both transactional and savings purposes” and that he would argue that “cryptocurrency captures greater interest from consumers today as they anticipate its value will rise in the future.”

Nevertheless, Krishnan said it’s crucial to acknowledge the risks associated with cryptocurrencies, including their extreme volatility, which means that the mainstream adoption of cryptocurrencies for everyday transactions is “still a work in progress.”

Per Krishnan, when cryptocurrencies “become a more viable option for day-to-day purchases, we can expect more payment providers to embrace and facilitate cryptocurrency transactions.” He added, however, that whether a business keeps the cryptocurrencies it accepts for goods and services or sells them right away “is linked to the company’s treasury strategy.”

According to the Capgemini executive, the price volatility of cryptocurrencies heavily influences this choice, as the market can move in either direction between the firm accepting payment and selling the digital assets, which would only be beneficial if it were actively engaging in crypto trading.

A business accepting cryptocurrency payments and selling the crypto right away, Krishnan said, also “sends a clear message to the market that they do not anticipate the cryptocurrency’s value to appreciate in the future.” Per his words, it’s a “de-risking move” the business makes.

Speaking to Cointelegraph, Justas Paulius, CEO of cryptocurrency payments processor CoinGate, took a balanced approach and said that it can’t be proven whether this buy-sell cycle has “a small, large or no impact at all as there are many factors that need to be considered first, for example, which cryptocurrency is being used, how and where it is being sold, and how much.”

Paulius added that consumers “tend to re-purchase cryptocurrency they’ve spent soon after,” suggesting that when businesses accept cryptocurrency, there’s indeed higher demand. He said, however, that the advantage may be in the generated liquidity:

“Whether the currency is being bought or sold, these actions from both sides create better liquidity in the market and, in a way, balances each other out, also helps determine the true price of a currency at any given moment.”

Businesses accepting cryptocurrency payments may nevertheless boost adoption in other ways, including by simply spreading awareness of their support for cryptocurrencies or specific payment processors that may offer other services.

Crypto payment processors as on-ramps

Cryptocurrency payment processors may allow businesses that do not accept cryptocurrency payments directly to allow consumers to pay with them. Major automobile manufacturer Honda, for example, does not accept crypto payments, but through FCF Pay, people can use Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies to buy a Honda car.

Paulius noted that awareness spreads as “people see these payment options being introduced by small and large businesses every day,” which signals a growing demand for digital assets. These signals, he said, could see businesses’ competitors become “intrigued and curious.”

He added there’s “little-to-no downside to enabling a crypto payment method,” but instead “brings several tangible benefits” to businesses that do. According to the Forrester Consulting study, accepting crypto does seem to bring in more customers who spend more.

Third-party payment processors, BitPay said, help businesses stay compliant with all local regulations to facilitate accepting cryptocurrency payments while promoting new businesses to the cryptocurrency community as they start accepting crypto payments:

“Leveraging third-party payment processors allows businesses to accept crypto payments without the need to touch or hold crypto, removing the volatility risks. The quick integration times and easy setup make it a simple, fast alternative to using your own wallet. Companies utilizing a processor also escape having to track their costs based on different coins for tax purposes.”

Speaking to Cointelegraph, Gracy Chen, managing director at cryptocurrency exchange Bitget, said that the “e adoption of new things requires extensive user education to establish awareness and trust,” and businesses using third-party payment processors “can play a pivotal role in popularizing cryptocurrencies.”

While third-party payment processors can seemingly be on-ramps for the cryptocurrency space, it’s worth noting that their use dilutes the foundational ethos of cryptocurrencies centered on decentralization and self-sovereignty. Using them also means businesses rely on an external platform to receive crypto payments, which could be hard to change in the future if necessary.

Paulius said that, in some cases, it may be more beneficial for businesses to manage their wallets. These firms, he said, could just use open-source solutions and run their own processors.

The move, however, would come with added risks “such as AML [Anti-Money Laundering] screening or KYC [Know Your Customer] management as you still need to follow the law and adhere to rules. He added:

“Businesses tend to want to accept many cryptocurrencies at once, but only get periodic payouts in a single currency like U.S. dollars or euros to a bank account, which would be challenging to set up by yourself.”

Paulius noted that businesses also want easy integrations, transaction notifications, and the ability to refund customers and accept payments on various networks, all of which are facilitated by payment processors.

While there are costs associated with integrating cryptocurrency payments with third-party payment processors, Paulius concluded, they are “still less expensive than processing card payments.”

While accepting cryptocurrency payments may be challenging for most businesses, what to do with the received amounts may prove just as difficult. Most companies accepting crypto payments convert the funds immediately, but what if they didn’t?

Why pay with crypto?

Even if businesses accept cryptocurrency payments — via their own solutions or third-party payment processors — one question remains: why would consumers choose to pay with cryptocurrencies over their local fiat currency, especially if they don’t previously own crypto?

Paulius said that in some cases, banking is not an option, and cryptocurrencies could be a much-needed solution. Refugees or people stuck in dire situations in countries foreign to them or where the financial system isn’t functioning could rely on a decentralized network for their payments.

While Paulius conceded that “it is not common for consumers to buy cryptocurrencies just to use them for retail payments,” it noted it’s “likely in several cases,” as some people value their privacy greatly.

“Many of those people use cryptocurrencies for buying VPNs, hosting solutions, proxies and similar services just because they can remain pseudonymous and disclose less or none of their personal information to fewer third parties.” 

Cryptocurrencies, Paulius concluded, can also be a faster way to make transactions. Speaking to Cointelegraph, Ilya Volkov, CEO and co-founder of YouHodler, said that in the city of Lugano, Switzerland, BTC and Tether (USDT) can easily be used in various shops and restaurants via the same point-of-sale terminals used for traditional card payments.

Per Volkov, some startups are working on ways to use these terminals to let users pay directly from their MetaMask wallets.

Companies can provide a way for consumers to use cryptocurrencies, making these digital assets more familiar and useful. Additionally, third-party processors make it easier and less intimidating for businesses to start accepting cryptocurrencies, which might encourage other companies to do the same, seeing the growing interest.

The path to mainstream adoption is more complex, however, as what is done with the cryptocurrency and whether consumers even choose to pay in crypto play a pivotal role.

While more sophisticated and tech-savvy consumers will likely use cryptocurrency payments to protect their privacy, cryptocurrencies could also provide a lifeline in more extreme scenarios. Whether they’ll be accepted as a payment method when showtime comes remains to be seen.

Pro-crypto CFTC boss, subcommittee rumored as Trump inauguration nears

Yuga Labs addresses Apefest ‘vision damage’ issue; community calls out poor management

The Bored Ape community was not very impressed by the Yuga Labs' reaction to the mishap, calling out their lack of basic health management at the event.

Several attendees of Yuga Labs’ ApeFest event on Nov. 4 in Hong Kong reported eye-related issues, including burns, damaged vision and “extreme pain” in their eyes.

Yuga Labs’ official X account has now addressed the issue, claiming they are aware of the reports of potential eye-related issues to many attendees and are investigating the cause behind them.

Yuga Labs claimed that less than 1% of the attendees have experienced eye-related symptoms, and most of the affected attendees are experiencing improvement in their conditions with the passage of time.

The Hong Kong event grabbed most of the headlines and attention of Crypto Twitter over the weekend. Many users came up with different theories behind the eye related injury with one user pointing toward a similar instance six years ago, where during a promotional event, third-party contractors installed disinfecting ultraviolet lights instead of stage lights, leading to similar eye injuries, burning, blindness, photokeratitis

Others pointed out that the effects of the UV lights could last from a couple of hours to a few days depending on the exposure.

Related: Ryder Ripps ordered to pay Yuga Labs $1.6M in copyright lawsuit

Many on social media platforms were critical of the organizers behind the event, claiming that they should have paid more attention to basic medical hazards with such a setup, and said:

“I can’t imagine paying so much money to be a part of a "club" that overlooks basic medical hazards. I have a Philipps UV Disinfectant lamp in my home, and you’re not even supposed to be in the same room as it when it's on. It literally says in the instructions to not look at it or be within close proximity as it can also release Ozone, which is toxic/carcinogenic gas.”

Many other attendees blasted Yuga Labs for its mishap, claiming that they had taken out loans to attend the event only to get more “eye-related medical bills I don’t know how to pay.”

Magazine: Slumdog billionaire — Incredible rags-to-riches tale of Polygon’s Sandeep Nailwal

Pro-crypto CFTC boss, subcommittee rumored as Trump inauguration nears

Hong Kong regulator issues tokenized investments requirements amid demand

The intent behind the tokenization of SFC-authorized investment products is tied to the rising market demand and the government’s willingness to facilitate market development.

The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong laid down the business requirements for offering tokenized securities and other investment products in a circular released Nov. 2.

The market demand in Hong Kong for tokenized investment products combined with the various benefits of blockchain technology became one of the key drivers for the SFC to consider issuing public guidelines on tokenizing the securities and futures market.

The circular broadly details 12 points, emphasizing four aspects — tokenization arrangement, disclosure, intermediaries and staff competence — for eligibility in issuing tokenized securities-related activities.

The intent behind the tokenization of SFC-authorized investment products is tied to the rising market demand and the government’s willingness to facilitate market development. Considering that the underlying product can meet all the applicable product authorization requirements and the additional safeguards to address the associated risks, the SFC stated:

“By adopting a see-through approach, the SFC is of the view that it is appropriate to allow primary dealing of tokenized SFC-authorised investment products.”

Providers are expected to take full responsibility for their tokenized products and ensure effective record-keeping, large risk appetite and demonstrate operational soundness, among other factors. The SFC further clarified:

“Product Providers should not use public-permissionless blockchain networks without additional and proper controls.”

Regarding disclosure requirements, providers need to clearly disclose whether settlements happen off-chain or on-chain and prove the ownership of tokens at all times. Lastly, the SFC will also require providers to “have at least one competent staff with relevant experience and expertise to operate and/or supervise the tokenization arrangement and to manage the new risks relating to ownership and technology appropriately.”

Related: HSBC and Ant Group test tokenized deposits under HKMA sandbox

Despite federal efforts to tokenize investment products, the interest in crypto for Hong Kong locals witnessed a significant decline.

A survey conducted by The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology’s business school revealed that the alleged JPEX’s $166-million scandal negatively impacted the investor’s willingness to invest in crypto.

Out of the 5,700 respondents, 41% of respondents would prefer not to hold virtual assets.

Magazine: Slumdog billionaire 2: ‘Top 10… brings no satisfaction’ says Polygon’s Sandeep Nailwal

Pro-crypto CFTC boss, subcommittee rumored as Trump inauguration nears

Blockchain adoption continues unabated — Bloomberg analyst

Blockchain adoption has been "unabated" throughout bull and bear markets over the past years, says Bloomberg analyst Jamie Coutts.

Should the current rate of adoption continue, blockchain technology could have 100 million daily users by 2028, according to projections by Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Jamie Coutts. 

On X (formerly Twitter), Coutts pointed out that blockchain adoption has been "unabated" throughout bull and bear markets over the past years. "Not having exposure to one of the largest structural trends of the next decade could be costly," said the analyst.

Daily active addresses exceed 5 million in the third quarter of 2023, up 14% from 2022, according to Coutts, while quarter-on-quarter growth has averaged 29% since 2019. "If we apply a more moderate 20% QoQ growth rate then we could reach 100 million daily users by 2028."

Coutts compared blockchain rate adoption with PayPal’s rate growth. According to him, it took the fintech giant 13 years to reach 100 million daily users. "If Ethereum was day zero for smart contracts (2015) then it may take a similar time frame for blockchains to reach similar level of adoption," he added.

Keeping the current pace of adoption, blockchain-based companies may also see a rise in valuations. Coutts noted that basic regressions show the blockchain ecosystem could be valued between $5 trillion to $14 trillion once 100 million users are onboard. "Thats up from $350b today."

Coutts projections are consistent with data suggesting sustained interest in blockchain technology. In spite of the market downturn, development in the crypto industry rose 5% in 2022. Additionally, a survey conducted by Celent in 2022 showed that 91% of institutional investors are interested in investing in tokenized assets — blockchain-based tokens that represent ownership of physical and digital assets.

"While overly simplistic extrapolations such as this should never be soley relied on for valuation purposes it, the exercise illustrates that users and prices are inextricably linked and that as adoption continues prices are likely to track much higher for some assets," Coutts predicted.

Magazine: Ethereum restaking — Blockchain innovation or dangerous house of cards?

Pro-crypto CFTC boss, subcommittee rumored as Trump inauguration nears

Coinbase user agreement dispute reaches US Supreme Court

The Supreme Court’s choice to take up this case represents a pivotal development for firms utilizing arbitration clauses.

The United States Supreme Court has taken up a legal dispute concerning Coinbase and its users, specifically addressing a significant procedural matter on whether a judge or an arbitrator should decide which contract governs disputes.

According to a report from Bloomberg, this issue stems from conflicting agreements between the parties, with one contract advocating arbitration and another supporting courtroom litigation.

Coinbase had initially applied arbitration clauses to its clients, but a complication arose with a sweepstakes agreement that directed dispute resolution to California courts. Following allegations of deceptive advertising, customers pursued legal action through a class-action lawsuit, contesting Coinbase’s usual arbitration process.

Coinbase’s efforts to promote arbitration faced opposition in lower courts. A federal judge in California, backed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, affirmed that the sweepstakes agreement, which favored courtroom resolution, should prevail. As a result, the company’s request to move the dispute to arbitration was not granted.

Related: Coinbase narrows loss, while crypto trading volumes fall in Q3

This judicial reluctance comes despite a recent Supreme Court decision, which leaned 5–4 in favor of Coinbase in a related matter. The court then ruled to support the company’s efforts to pause customer lawsuits while it sought to move disputes into arbitration.

During this legal dispute, Coinbase has remained proactive. The company has broadened its services, introducing new trading options for its users. Eligible retail customers can now engage in crypto futures trading, with contracts sized more accessibly, representing a fraction of the value of Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH).

The Supreme Court’s choice to take up this case represents a pivotal development for firms utilizing arbitration clauses. It also highlights the court’s continued involvement in defining the distinctions between arbitration and legal proceedings. The verdict will likely impact the formulation and enforcement of user agreements, particularly in the ever-evolving domain of digital currency trading.

Magazine: Samsung’s Bitcoin ETF, $700M bust, Coinbase exits Japan: Asia Express

Pro-crypto CFTC boss, subcommittee rumored as Trump inauguration nears